Assessing solutions to overcome Quality 4.0 barriers: a decision-making framework

被引:5
|
作者
Virmani, Naveen [1 ]
Upadhyay, Manas [2 ]
Luthra, Sunil [3 ]
Singh, Sanjeet [4 ]
Upadhyay, Arvind [5 ]
机构
[1] IMS Ghaziabad B Sch, Ghaziabad, India
[2] Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Maharaj Univ, Kanpur, India
[3] All India Council Tech Educ, Training & Learning Bur, Delhi, India
[4] Chandigarh Univ, Chandigarh, India
[5] Univ Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
来源
TQM JOURNAL | 2024年 / 36卷 / 06期
关键词
Quality; 4.0; Fuzzy-AHP; Fuzzy-TOPSIS; Continuous improvement; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; PYTHAGOREAN FUZZY AHP; PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES; ADOPTION; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1108/TQM-06-2023-0170
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
PurposeThe industrial revolution changed the market landscape significantly in all industrial sectors. It has a noteworthy impact on enhancing the quality of goods and services. The quality aspect is of utmost concern and determines the success or failure of any product. Therefore, the presented study analyses the key barriers and solutions of Quality 4.0.Design/methodology/approachTwenty barriers and fifteen solutions were identified using a literature review and investigated using a hybrid approach. Barrier weights were evaluated with the help of the fuzzy AHP method. Furthermore, the computed weights were used to perform computations in the next step using fuzzy-TOPSIS to prioritize the ranking of identified solutions.FindingsThe research results show that "Lack of applying advanced analytics to uncover Quality 4.0 initiatives" and "Lack of integrating data from various sources across the organization" are the topmost barriers. Furthermore, "Implement a leadership development program focused on Quality 4.0" and "Cross-departmental peer learning environment" are the topmost solutions.Practical implicationsManagers and industrialists can benefit from Quality 4.0 through improved decision-making, process efficiency, supply chain collaboration, agile quality management, enhanced customer experience and a culture of continuous improvement. This results in better quality, operational effectiveness and a competitive edge.Originality/valueThe solutions need to be mapped with barriers to adopting Quality 4.0. Furthermore, the research results involve novelty by prioritizing the solutions to overcome the anticipated barriers.
引用
收藏
页码:1460 / 1485
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessing the impact of enterprise resource planning on decision-making quality An empirical study
    Ouiddad, Ahmed
    Okar, Chafik
    Chroqui, Razane
    Beqqali Hassani, Imane
    KYBERNETES, 2021, 50 (05) : 1144 - 1162
  • [42] A Method for Assessing and Predicting Water Quality Status for Improved Decision-Making and Management
    Mijares, Valeria
    Gitau, Margaret
    Johnson, David R.
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2019, 33 (02) : 509 - 522
  • [43] Assessing the educational quality of shared decision-making interventions for residents: A systematic review
    Spinnewijn, Laura
    Scheele, Fedde
    Braat, Didi
    Aarts, Johanna
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2024, 123
  • [45] A Method for Assessing and Predicting Water Quality Status for Improved Decision-Making and Management
    Valeria Mijares
    Margaret Gitau
    David R. Johnson
    Water Resources Management, 2019, 33 : 509 - 522
  • [46] Assessing the decision-making capacity of the addicted population to take part in research: myths, barriers, and benefits
    Moran-Sanchez, Ines
    Luna, Aurelio
    Dolores Perez-Carceles, Maria
    ADICCIONES, 2017, 29 (03) : 213 - 214
  • [47] Assessing the capacity of ministries of health to use research in decision-making: conceptual framework and tool
    Rodriguez, Daniela C.
    Hoe, Connie
    Dale, Elina M.
    Rahman, M. Hafizur
    Akhter, Sadika
    Hafeez, Assad
    Irava, Wayne
    Rajbangshi, Preety
    Roman, Tamlyn
    Tirdea, Marcela
    Yamout, Rouham
    Peters, David H.
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2017, 15
  • [48] Assessing the capacity of ministries of health to use research in decision-making: conceptual framework and tool
    Daniela C. Rodríguez
    Connie Hoe
    Elina M. Dale
    M. Hafizur Rahman
    Sadika Akhter
    Assad Hafeez
    Wayne Irava
    Preety Rajbangshi
    Tamlyn Roman
    Marcela Ţîrdea
    Rouham Yamout
    David H. Peters
    Health Research Policy and Systems, 15
  • [49] Evaluation of circular supply chains barriers in the era of Industry 4.0 transition using an extended decision-making approach
    Shang, Chao
    Saeidi, Parvaneh
    Goh, Chin Fei
    JOURNAL OF ENTERPRISE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2022, 35 (4/5) : 1100 - 1128
  • [50] Assessing decision-making capacity at end of life
    Kolva, Elissa
    Rosenfeld, Barry
    Brescia, Robert
    Comfort, Christopher
    GENERAL HOSPITAL PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 36 (04) : 392 - 397