Assessing solutions to overcome Quality 4.0 barriers: a decision-making framework

被引:5
|
作者
Virmani, Naveen [1 ]
Upadhyay, Manas [2 ]
Luthra, Sunil [3 ]
Singh, Sanjeet [4 ]
Upadhyay, Arvind [5 ]
机构
[1] IMS Ghaziabad B Sch, Ghaziabad, India
[2] Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Maharaj Univ, Kanpur, India
[3] All India Council Tech Educ, Training & Learning Bur, Delhi, India
[4] Chandigarh Univ, Chandigarh, India
[5] Univ Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
来源
TQM JOURNAL | 2024年 / 36卷 / 06期
关键词
Quality; 4.0; Fuzzy-AHP; Fuzzy-TOPSIS; Continuous improvement; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; PYTHAGOREAN FUZZY AHP; PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES; ADOPTION; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1108/TQM-06-2023-0170
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
PurposeThe industrial revolution changed the market landscape significantly in all industrial sectors. It has a noteworthy impact on enhancing the quality of goods and services. The quality aspect is of utmost concern and determines the success or failure of any product. Therefore, the presented study analyses the key barriers and solutions of Quality 4.0.Design/methodology/approachTwenty barriers and fifteen solutions were identified using a literature review and investigated using a hybrid approach. Barrier weights were evaluated with the help of the fuzzy AHP method. Furthermore, the computed weights were used to perform computations in the next step using fuzzy-TOPSIS to prioritize the ranking of identified solutions.FindingsThe research results show that "Lack of applying advanced analytics to uncover Quality 4.0 initiatives" and "Lack of integrating data from various sources across the organization" are the topmost barriers. Furthermore, "Implement a leadership development program focused on Quality 4.0" and "Cross-departmental peer learning environment" are the topmost solutions.Practical implicationsManagers and industrialists can benefit from Quality 4.0 through improved decision-making, process efficiency, supply chain collaboration, agile quality management, enhanced customer experience and a culture of continuous improvement. This results in better quality, operational effectiveness and a competitive edge.Originality/valueThe solutions need to be mapped with barriers to adopting Quality 4.0. Furthermore, the research results involve novelty by prioritizing the solutions to overcome the anticipated barriers.
引用
收藏
页码:1460 / 1485
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ASSESSING PROFESSIONAL DECISION-MAKING ABILITIES
    MCNERGNEY, R
    HINSON, S
    ECTJ-EDUCATIONAL COMMUNICATION AND TECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 1985, 33 (03): : 179 - 183
  • [22] Assessing adolescent decision-making competence
    Fischhoff, Baruch
    DEVELOPMENTAL REVIEW, 2008, 28 (01) : 12 - 28
  • [23] A NEW ENTREPRENEURIAL DECISION-MAKING SUPPORT FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING BUSINESS LINE CORRELATIONS
    Fulea, Mircea
    Sandru, Gabriela
    Brad, Stelian
    Maftei, Mihaela
    AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC, 2015, 17 : 1198 - 1212
  • [24] A multicriteria decision-making framework for assessing the performance of gynecobstetrics departments: a case study
    Ortiz-Barrios, Miguel
    Gutierrez-Severiche, Edward
    Combita-Nino, Dayana
    Jimenez-Delgado, Genett
    Ishizaka, Alessio
    Barbati, Maria
    Herrera-Fontalvo, Zulmeira
    INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS IN OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (01) : 328 - 368
  • [25] DECISION-MAKING FOR QUALITY SCIENCE
    FUQUA, D
    WALGREN, D
    SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 1982, (39) : 32 - 34
  • [26] Impact of Industry 4.0 on decision-making in an operational context
    Rosin, F.
    Forget, P.
    Lamouri, S.
    Pellerin, R.
    ADVANCES IN PRODUCTION ENGINEERING & MANAGEMENT, 2021, 16 (04): : 500 - 514
  • [27] Decision-Making Framework of Requirement Engineering Barriers in the Domain of Global Healthcare Information Systems
    Hamza, Muhammad
    Akbar, Muhammad Azeem
    Alsanad, Abeer Abdulaziz
    Alsuwaidan, Lulwah
    AlSagri, Hatoon S.
    Al-Alshaikh, Halah Abdulaziz
    Kanwal, Maliha
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2022, 2022
  • [28] Barriers to rational decision-making in environmental planning
    Gezelius, Stig S.
    Refsgaard, Karen
    LAND USE POLICY, 2007, 24 (02) : 338 - 348
  • [29] ANALYSIS OF BARRIERS IN DECISION-MAKING OF UNSTRUCTURED PROBLEMS
    Richter, Jiri
    Mazalova, Ivana
    HRADEC ECONOMIC DAYS, VOL 6, ISSUE 1, 2016, 6 : 896 - 902
  • [30] Decision-Making and the Barriers to Judicious Antibiotic Use
    Meropol, Sharon B.
    Votruba, Mark E.
    PEDIATRICS, 2015, 136 (02) : 387 - 388