Assessing solutions to overcome Quality 4.0 barriers: a decision-making framework

被引:5
|
作者
Virmani, Naveen [1 ]
Upadhyay, Manas [2 ]
Luthra, Sunil [3 ]
Singh, Sanjeet [4 ]
Upadhyay, Arvind [5 ]
机构
[1] IMS Ghaziabad B Sch, Ghaziabad, India
[2] Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Maharaj Univ, Kanpur, India
[3] All India Council Tech Educ, Training & Learning Bur, Delhi, India
[4] Chandigarh Univ, Chandigarh, India
[5] Univ Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
来源
TQM JOURNAL | 2024年 / 36卷 / 06期
关键词
Quality; 4.0; Fuzzy-AHP; Fuzzy-TOPSIS; Continuous improvement; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; PYTHAGOREAN FUZZY AHP; PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES; ADOPTION; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1108/TQM-06-2023-0170
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
PurposeThe industrial revolution changed the market landscape significantly in all industrial sectors. It has a noteworthy impact on enhancing the quality of goods and services. The quality aspect is of utmost concern and determines the success or failure of any product. Therefore, the presented study analyses the key barriers and solutions of Quality 4.0.Design/methodology/approachTwenty barriers and fifteen solutions were identified using a literature review and investigated using a hybrid approach. Barrier weights were evaluated with the help of the fuzzy AHP method. Furthermore, the computed weights were used to perform computations in the next step using fuzzy-TOPSIS to prioritize the ranking of identified solutions.FindingsThe research results show that "Lack of applying advanced analytics to uncover Quality 4.0 initiatives" and "Lack of integrating data from various sources across the organization" are the topmost barriers. Furthermore, "Implement a leadership development program focused on Quality 4.0" and "Cross-departmental peer learning environment" are the topmost solutions.Practical implicationsManagers and industrialists can benefit from Quality 4.0 through improved decision-making, process efficiency, supply chain collaboration, agile quality management, enhanced customer experience and a culture of continuous improvement. This results in better quality, operational effectiveness and a competitive edge.Originality/valueThe solutions need to be mapped with barriers to adopting Quality 4.0. Furthermore, the research results involve novelty by prioritizing the solutions to overcome the anticipated barriers.
引用
收藏
页码:1460 / 1485
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Algorithmic Decision-Making Framework
    Kissell, Robert
    Malamut, Roberto
    JOURNAL OF TRADING, 2006, 1 (01): : 12 - 21
  • [12] The collaborative decision-making framework
    Andrle, Stephen J.
    D'Ignazio, Janet
    TR News, 2009, (260): : 17 - 23
  • [13] Decision-Making Framework for Refactoring
    Leppanen, Marko
    Lahtinen, Samuel
    Kuusinen, Kati
    Makinen, Simo
    Mannisto, Tomi
    Itkonen, Juha
    Yli-Huumo, Jesse
    Lehtonen, Timo
    2015 IEEE 7TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON MANAGING TECHNICAL DEBT (MTD) PROCEEDINGS, 2015, : 61 - 68
  • [14] Analyzing barriers to sustainable healthcare waste disposal: a hybrid decision-making framework
    Kumar, Santosh
    Tarei, Pradeep Kumar
    Swarnakar, Vikas
    BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [15] DECISION-MAKING PROCEDURE AND DECISION QUALITY
    BURLESON, BR
    LEVINE, BJ
    SAMTER, W
    HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 1984, 10 (04) : 557 - 574
  • [16] Let's Open the Decision-Making Umbrella: A Framework for Conceptualizing and Assessing Features of Impaired Decision Making in Addiction
    Rochat, Lucien
    Maurage, Pierre
    Heeren, Alexandre
    Billieux, Joel
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2019, 29 (01) : 27 - 51
  • [17] Let’s Open the Decision-Making Umbrella: A Framework for Conceptualizing and Assessing Features of Impaired Decision Making in Addiction
    Lucien Rochat
    Pierre Maurage
    Alexandre Heeren
    Joël Billieux
    Neuropsychology Review, 2019, 29 : 27 - 51
  • [18] A framework for prioritizing the solutions to overcome sustainable manufacturing barriers
    Malek, Javed
    Desai, Tushar N.
    CLEANER LOGISTICS AND SUPPLY CHAIN, 2021, 1
  • [19] A multi-criteria decision-making framework for assessing the quality and cost of facility layout alternatives: a case study
    Alsyouf, I.
    Al-Araidah, O.
    Tates, M.
    Ciganovic, R.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART B-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MANUFACTURE, 2012, 226 (B2) : 353 - 364
  • [20] A guide to assessing decision-making capacity
    Jones, RC
    Holden, T
    CLEVELAND CLINIC JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 71 (12) : 971 - 975