Assessing solutions to overcome Quality 4.0 barriers: a decision-making framework

被引:5
|
作者
Virmani, Naveen [1 ]
Upadhyay, Manas [2 ]
Luthra, Sunil [3 ]
Singh, Sanjeet [4 ]
Upadhyay, Arvind [5 ]
机构
[1] IMS Ghaziabad B Sch, Ghaziabad, India
[2] Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Maharaj Univ, Kanpur, India
[3] All India Council Tech Educ, Training & Learning Bur, Delhi, India
[4] Chandigarh Univ, Chandigarh, India
[5] Univ Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
来源
TQM JOURNAL | 2024年 / 36卷 / 06期
关键词
Quality; 4.0; Fuzzy-AHP; Fuzzy-TOPSIS; Continuous improvement; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; PYTHAGOREAN FUZZY AHP; PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES; ADOPTION; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1108/TQM-06-2023-0170
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
PurposeThe industrial revolution changed the market landscape significantly in all industrial sectors. It has a noteworthy impact on enhancing the quality of goods and services. The quality aspect is of utmost concern and determines the success or failure of any product. Therefore, the presented study analyses the key barriers and solutions of Quality 4.0.Design/methodology/approachTwenty barriers and fifteen solutions were identified using a literature review and investigated using a hybrid approach. Barrier weights were evaluated with the help of the fuzzy AHP method. Furthermore, the computed weights were used to perform computations in the next step using fuzzy-TOPSIS to prioritize the ranking of identified solutions.FindingsThe research results show that "Lack of applying advanced analytics to uncover Quality 4.0 initiatives" and "Lack of integrating data from various sources across the organization" are the topmost barriers. Furthermore, "Implement a leadership development program focused on Quality 4.0" and "Cross-departmental peer learning environment" are the topmost solutions.Practical implicationsManagers and industrialists can benefit from Quality 4.0 through improved decision-making, process efficiency, supply chain collaboration, agile quality management, enhanced customer experience and a culture of continuous improvement. This results in better quality, operational effectiveness and a competitive edge.Originality/valueThe solutions need to be mapped with barriers to adopting Quality 4.0. Furthermore, the research results involve novelty by prioritizing the solutions to overcome the anticipated barriers.
引用
收藏
页码:1460 / 1485
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Decision-Making Framework for Sediment Contamination
    Chapman, Peter M.
    Anderson, Janette
    INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 1 (03) : 163 - 173
  • [32] A Bayesian decision-making framework for replication
    Hardwicke, Tom E.
    Tessler, Michael Henry
    Peloquin, Benjamin N.
    Frank, Michael C.
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2018, 41
  • [33] A FOODSERVICE INFORMATION FRAMEWORK FOR DECISION-MAKING
    MATTHEWS, ME
    FOOD TECHNOLOGY, 1983, 37 (12) : 46 - &
  • [34] A decision-making framework for precision marketing
    You, Zhen
    Si, Yain-Whar
    Zhang, Defu
    Zeng, XiangXiang
    Leung, Stephen C. H.
    Li, Tao
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2015, 42 (07) : 3357 - 3367
  • [35] A decision-making framework for wildfire suppression
    Petrovic, N.
    Carlson, J. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 2012, 21 (08) : 927 - 937
  • [36] A FRAMEWORK FOR FOOD SAFETY DECISION-MAKING
    不详
    FOOD PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT, 1980, 14 (05): : 104 - 104
  • [37] AN INTERACTION FRAMEWORK OF CONSUMER DECISION-MAKING
    PUNJ, GN
    STEWART, DW
    JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1983, 10 (02) : 181 - 196
  • [38] A NEW DECISION-MAKING SYSTEMS FRAMEWORK
    Molloy, Ella-Mae
    Siemieniuch, Carys
    Sinclair, Murray
    CONTEMPORARY ERGONOMICS 2008, 2008, : 55 - +
  • [39] A holistic decision-making approach to assessing service quality in higher education institutions
    Sahin, Aleyna
    Imamoglu, Gul
    Murat, Mirac
    Ayyildiz, Ertugrul
    SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES, 2024, 92
  • [40] Assessing the epistemic quality of democratic decision-making in terms of adequate support for conclusions
    Friberg-Fernros, Henrik
    Schaffer, Johan Karlsson
    SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY, 2017, 31 (03) : 251 - 265