A novel multimodality anthropomorphic phantom enhances compliance with quality assurance guidelines for magnetic resonance imaging in radiotherapy

被引:0
|
作者
Alzahrani, Meshal [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Broadbent, David A. [2 ,3 ]
Teh, Irvin [3 ]
Al-Qaisieh, Bashar [2 ]
Johnstone, Emily [4 ]
Speight, Richard [2 ]
机构
[1] King Abdulaziz Univ, Fac Appl Med Sci, Dept Radiol Sci, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[2] Leeds Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Med Phys & Engn, Leeds, England
[3] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Cardiovasc & Metab Med, Leeds, England
[4] Christie NHS Fdn Trust, Christie Med Phys & Engn, Manchester, England
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Radiotherapy; MRI in RT; Quality assurance; ACR phantom; Multimodal anthropomorphic phantom; IMPLEMENTATION; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.phro.2025.100707
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for radiotherapy (RT) simulation has grown, prompting quality assurance (QA) guidelines by the Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine (IPEM) and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM). This study compares a novel multimodality anthropomorphic phantom to an American College of Radiology (ACR) phantom for a subset of these MRI-specific QA tests in RT. Materials and methods: A novel 3D-printed multimodality head-and-neck anthropomorphic phantom was compared to an ACR large MRI phantom. IPEM and AAPM-recommended QA tests were conducted, including informatics/connectivity/data transfer, MRI-CT registration, end-to-end QA, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)/ percentage integral uniformity (PIU) assessments using RT accessories. Results: Both phantoms were suitable for informatics/connectivity/data transfer. In MRI-CT registration, no errors were found; the ACR phantom offered more quantitative landmarks, while the anthropomorphic phantom provided limited structures. Both phantoms achieved target registration errors (TREs) below 0.97 mm and dice similarity coefficient (DSC) values above 0.9, meeting guidelines. For end-to-end QA, the anthropomorphic phantom facilitated dose measurements of 1.994 Gy versus a calculated 2.01 Gy (-0.8 %). SNR and PIU assessments showed higher values in radiology setups compared to RT setups for both phantoms. Conclusions: Multimodality anthropomorphic phantoms compatible with dosimetric equipment allow realistic end-to-end QA, unlike the ACR phantom. While the ACR phantom is suitable for informatics and MRI-CT registration, anthropomorphic phantoms better represent clinical scenarios. For comprehensive QA, both ACR and anthropomorphic phantoms are required. Additionally, large field-of-view (FOV) phantoms are crucial for evaluating large FOV MRI distortions.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A novel anthropomorphic multimodality phantom for MRI-based radiotherapy quality assurance testing
    Singhrao, Kamal
    Fu, Jie
    Wu, Holden H.
    Hu, Peng
    Kishan, Amar U.
    Chin, Robert K.
    Lewis, John H.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (04) : 1443 - 1451
  • [2] Multimodality image correlation quality assurance anthropomorphic phantom
    Mutic, S
    Bosch, WR
    Drzymala, RE
    Chao, KSC
    Low, DA
    Lewis, JS
    Cutler, PD
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-4, 2000, 22 : 1172 - 1175
  • [3] Dynamic anthropomorphic thorax phantom for quality assurance of motion management in radiotherapy
    Abdollahi, Sara
    Mowlavi, Ali Asghar
    Yazdi, Mohammad Hadi Hadizadeh
    Ceberg, Sofie
    Aznar, Marianne Camille
    Tabrizi, Fatemeh Varshoee
    Salek, Roham
    Guckenberger, Matthias
    Tanadini-Lang, Stephanie
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 30
  • [4] dynamic anthropomorphic thorax phantom for quality assurance of motion management in radiotherapy
    Abdollahi, Sara
    Mowlavi, Ali Asghar
    Yazdi, Mohammad Hadi Hadizadeh
    Ceberg, Sofie
    Aznar, Marianne Camille
    Tabrizi, Fatemeh Varshoee
    Salek, Roham
    Guckenberger, Matthias
    Tanadini-Lang, Stephanie
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S3281 - S3285
  • [5] Quality Assurance Testing Methods and Customized Phantom for Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy
    Song, K-H
    Lee, D-W
    Choe, B-Y
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3255 - 3255
  • [6] Sensitivity analysis of different quality assurance methods for magnetic resonance imaging in radiotherapy
    Adjeiwaah, Mary
    Garpebring, Anders
    Nyholm, Tufve
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 13 : 21 - 27
  • [7] An integrated and fast imaging quality assurance phantom for a 0.35 T magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator
    Sohn, James J.
    Lim, Sara
    Das, Indra J.
    Yadav, Poonam
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 27
  • [8] QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES IN RADIOTHERAPY FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING USING IMAGEJ SOFTWARE
    Cerqua, L.
    Aragno, D.
    Cotroneo, E.
    Pacilio, M.
    Pressello, M. C.
    Rauco, R.
    Santini, E.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 99 : S435 - S436
  • [9] QUALITY ASSURANCE IN MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING
    PRICE, RR
    PATTON, JA
    ERICKSON, JJ
    PICKENS, DR
    RUNGE, V
    PARTAIN, CL
    JAMES, AE
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1984, 11 (03) : 412 - 413
  • [10] Development and validation of a novel large field of view phantom and a software module for the quality assurance of geometric distortion in magnetic resonance imaging
    Torfeh, Tarraf
    Hammoud, Rabih
    McGarry, Maeve
    Al-Hammadi, Noora
    Perkins, Gregory
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2015, 33 (07) : 939 - 949