A novel multimodality anthropomorphic phantom enhances compliance with quality assurance guidelines for magnetic resonance imaging in radiotherapy

被引:0
|
作者
Alzahrani, Meshal [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Broadbent, David A. [2 ,3 ]
Teh, Irvin [3 ]
Al-Qaisieh, Bashar [2 ]
Johnstone, Emily [4 ]
Speight, Richard [2 ]
机构
[1] King Abdulaziz Univ, Fac Appl Med Sci, Dept Radiol Sci, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[2] Leeds Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Med Phys & Engn, Leeds, England
[3] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Cardiovasc & Metab Med, Leeds, England
[4] Christie NHS Fdn Trust, Christie Med Phys & Engn, Manchester, England
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Radiotherapy; MRI in RT; Quality assurance; ACR phantom; Multimodal anthropomorphic phantom; IMPLEMENTATION; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.phro.2025.100707
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for radiotherapy (RT) simulation has grown, prompting quality assurance (QA) guidelines by the Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine (IPEM) and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM). This study compares a novel multimodality anthropomorphic phantom to an American College of Radiology (ACR) phantom for a subset of these MRI-specific QA tests in RT. Materials and methods: A novel 3D-printed multimodality head-and-neck anthropomorphic phantom was compared to an ACR large MRI phantom. IPEM and AAPM-recommended QA tests were conducted, including informatics/connectivity/data transfer, MRI-CT registration, end-to-end QA, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)/ percentage integral uniformity (PIU) assessments using RT accessories. Results: Both phantoms were suitable for informatics/connectivity/data transfer. In MRI-CT registration, no errors were found; the ACR phantom offered more quantitative landmarks, while the anthropomorphic phantom provided limited structures. Both phantoms achieved target registration errors (TREs) below 0.97 mm and dice similarity coefficient (DSC) values above 0.9, meeting guidelines. For end-to-end QA, the anthropomorphic phantom facilitated dose measurements of 1.994 Gy versus a calculated 2.01 Gy (-0.8 %). SNR and PIU assessments showed higher values in radiology setups compared to RT setups for both phantoms. Conclusions: Multimodality anthropomorphic phantoms compatible with dosimetric equipment allow realistic end-to-end QA, unlike the ACR phantom. While the ACR phantom is suitable for informatics and MRI-CT registration, anthropomorphic phantoms better represent clinical scenarios. For comprehensive QA, both ACR and anthropomorphic phantoms are required. Additionally, large field-of-view (FOV) phantoms are crucial for evaluating large FOV MRI distortions.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Quantitative DCE-CT Imaging Quality Assurance with a Novel Dynamic Flow Phantom
    Driscoll, B.
    Coolens, C.
    Keller, H.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (06)
  • [32] Task group 284 report: magnetic resonance imaging simulation in radiotherapy: considerations for clinical implementation, optimization, and quality assurance
    Glide-Hurst, Carri K.
    Paulson, Eric S.
    McGee, Kiaran
    Tyagi, Neelam
    Hu, Yanle
    Balter, James
    Bayouth, John
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (07) : E636 - E670
  • [33] Deep Learning Approaches for Automatic Quality Assurance of Magnetic Resonance Images Using ACR Phantom
    Tarraf Torfeh
    Souha Aouadi
    SA Yoganathan
    Satheesh Paloor
    Rabih Hammoud
    Noora Al-Hammadi
    BMC Medical Imaging, 23
  • [34] Deep Learning Approaches for Automatic Quality Assurance of Magnetic Resonance Images Using ACR Phantom
    Torfeh, Tarraf
    Aouadi, Souha
    Yoganathan, S. A.
    Paloor, Satheesh
    Hammoud, Rabih
    Al-Hammadi, Noora
    BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [35] Use of the ACR CT Accreditation Phantom for Routine Quality Assurance of CBCT Imaging Systems in a Radiotherapy Environment
    Hobson, M.
    Parker, W.
    Soisson, E.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (06)
  • [36] An Automatic Image Processing Workflow for Daily Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quality Assurance
    Juha I. Peltonen
    Teemu Mäkelä
    Alexey Sofiev
    Eero Salli
    Journal of Digital Imaging, 2017, 30 : 163 - 171
  • [37] Quality assurance of magnetic resonance Spectroscopic Imaging-guided radiation therapy
    Hunjan, S
    Spielman, D
    Adalsteinsson, E
    Boyer, A
    Xing, L
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (06) : 1320 - 1320
  • [38] Factors influencing daily quality assurance measurements of magnetic resonance imaging scanners
    Owusu, Nana
    Magnotta, Vincent A.
    RADIOLOGICAL PHYSICS AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 14 (04) : 396 - 401
  • [39] Factors influencing daily quality assurance measurements of magnetic resonance imaging scanners
    Nana Owusu
    Vincent A. Magnotta
    Radiological Physics and Technology, 2021, 14 : 396 - 401
  • [40] ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN QUALITY ASSURANCE AND PHENOTYPE IN MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING (MRI) DATA
    Ai, Lei
    Kovacs, Meagan
    Yeo, Anna
    Lachman, Ana Restrepo
    Milham, Michael P.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 56 (10): : S158 - S158