Factors influencing daily quality assurance measurements of magnetic resonance imaging scanners

被引:3
|
作者
Owusu, Nana [1 ,2 ]
Magnotta, Vincent A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Dept Radiol, Iowa City, IA 52240 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Dept Biomed Engn, Iowa City, IA 52240 USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Dept Psychiat, Iowa City, IA 52240 USA
[4] 169 Newton Rd, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Signal-to-noise ratio; Quality assurance; MRI;
D O I
10.1007/s12194-021-00638-y
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Magnetic resonance imaging is commonly used in hospitals and clinics to aid medical diagnoses. Scanner performance should be assessed regularly, including daily, weekly, and yearly evaluations to ensure high-quality and artifact-free images. Of these assessments, the daily quality assurance monitors the image quality of the scanner using a manufacturer-provided protocol. In this study, we sought to determine the factors that introduced variability in daily quality assurance data. A phantom was scanned using a head coil in two schemes: with varied phantom placement daily, and with a single phantom placement, and evaluated over approximately 1 month. Minor placement and localization changes accounted for approximately 50% of the variability in the signal-to-noise ratios observed in these measures, driven by changes in the measured signal, while the noise remained constant. The changes in the signal-to-noise ratios were small over the 2-month study period.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 401
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Factors influencing daily quality assurance measurements of magnetic resonance imaging scanners
    Nana Owusu
    Vincent A. Magnotta
    Radiological Physics and Technology, 2021, 14 : 396 - 401
  • [2] An Automatic Image Processing Workflow for Daily Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quality Assurance
    Juha I. Peltonen
    Teemu Mäkelä
    Alexey Sofiev
    Eero Salli
    Journal of Digital Imaging, 2017, 30 : 163 - 171
  • [3] An Automatic Image Processing Workflow for Daily Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quality Assurance
    Peltonen, Juha I.
    Makela, Teemu
    Sofiev, Alexey
    Salli, Eero
    JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2017, 30 (02) : 163 - 171
  • [4] QUALITY ASSURANCE IN MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING
    PRICE, RR
    PATTON, JA
    ERICKSON, JJ
    PICKENS, DR
    RUNGE, V
    PARTAIN, CL
    JAMES, AE
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1984, 11 (03) : 412 - 413
  • [5] Reproducibility of magnetic resonance imaging measurements of spinal cord atrophy: The role of quality assurance
    Leary, SM
    Parker, GJM
    Stevenson, VL
    Barker, GJ
    Miller, DH
    Thompson, AJ
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1999, 17 (05) : 773 - 776
  • [6] Magnetic resonance imaging quality control, quality assurance and quality improvement
    Sreedher, Gayathri
    Ho, Mai-Lan
    Smith, Mark
    Udayasankar, Unni K.
    Risacher, Seretha
    Rapalino, Otto
    Greer, Mary-Louise C.
    Doria, Andrea S.
    Gee, Michael S.
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2021, 51 (05) : 698 - 708
  • [7] Magnetic resonance imaging quality control, quality assurance and quality improvement
    Gayathri Sreedher
    Mai-Lan Ho
    Mark Smith
    Unni K. Udayasankar
    Seretha Risacher
    Otto Rapalino
    Mary-Louise C. Greer
    Andrea S. Doria
    Michael S. Gee
    Pediatric Radiology, 2021, 51 : 698 - 708
  • [8] PHANTOMS FOR SPECIFICATIONS AND QUALITY ASSURANCE OF MR IMAGING SCANNERS
    GOODENOUGH, DJ
    WEAVER, KE
    COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL IMAGING AND GRAPHICS, 1988, 12 (04) : 193 - 209
  • [9] Magnetic resonance imaging - Current status of the discussion on quality assurance
    Fischer, J
    RADIOLOGE, 2001, 41 (05): : M73 - M74
  • [10] SEMIAUTOMATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FOR QUANTITATIVE MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING
    BARKER, GJ
    TOFTS, PS
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1992, 10 (04) : 585 - 595