Agrivoltaics as an SDG enabler: Trade-offs and co-benefits for food security, energy generation and emissions mitigation

被引:1
|
作者
Pandey, Ganesh [1 ]
Lyden, Sarah [1 ]
Franklin, Evan [1 ]
Harrison, Matthew Tom [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Sch Engn, Hobart, Tas 7005, Australia
[2] Univ Tasmania, Tasmanian Inst Agr, Launceston, Tas 7248, Australia
关键词
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs); Trade-offs and co-benefits; Agrivoltaic system (AVS); Livestock based AVS; Greenhouse gas; Climate action; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; DECISION-SUPPORT TOOL; CONDITION SCORE; LAND-USE; PASTURE; PRODUCTIVITY; MANAGEMENT; POLICIES; IMPACT; PANELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.resenv.2024.100186
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Agrivoltaic systems (AVS) - wherein solar photovoltaics (PV) and agriculture are co-located on the same land parcel - offer a sustainable approach to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by enabling concurrent renewable electricity and agri-food production. Here, we elucidate plausible co-benefits and tradeoffs of agri-food production and electricity generation in AVS across manifold socio-enviro-economic contexts, with the aim of understanding the contextualized interplay between AVS implementation and progress towards the SDGs. We modeled three AVS designs with varying solar panel densities (high, mid, low) at case study locations in Australia, Chad, and Iran using various models (System Advisor Model for PV and GrassGro for livestock systems). The findings suggest that in regions conducive to high biomass production per unit area, such as in parts of Australia, AVS design with high solar panel density can reduce meat production by almost 50%, which can jeopardize food security and impede achieving SDG 2 (Zero Hunger). In these regions, AVS design with low solar panel density enables meeting SDGs aligned with agri-food production and renewable energy generation. In contrast, in semi-arid regions, such as Iran, AVS design with a high density of solar panels can improve agricultural production via the alleviation of water deficit, thereby supporting the prioritization of solar power generation, with food production as a co-benefit. In developing countries such as Chad, AVS can enhance economic development by providing electricity, food, and financial benefits. We call for policymakers to incentivize AVS deployment in such regions and stimulate public and private investment to enable progress towards SDGs.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sustainability transitions in the agri-food system: Evaluating mitigation potentials, economy-wide effects, co-benefits and trade-offs for the case of Austria
    Preinfalk, Eva
    Bednar-Friedl, Birgit
    Mayer, Jakob
    Lauk, Christian
    Mayer, Andreas
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2024, 226
  • [22] Combining mitigation strategies to increase co-benefits for biodiversity and food security
    Prudhomme, Remi
    De Palma, Adriana
    Dumas, Patrice
    Gonzalez, Ricardo
    Leadley, Paul
    Levrel, Harold
    Purvis, Andy
    Brunelle, Thierry
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 15 (11)
  • [23] Co-benefits and trade-offs between agriculture and conservation: A case study in Northern Australia
    Stoeckl, N.
    Chaiechi, T.
    Farr, M.
    Jarvis, D.
    Alvarez-Romero, J. G.
    Kennard, M. J.
    Hermoso, V.
    Pressey, R. L.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2015, 191 : 478 - 494
  • [24] Co-benefits of and trade-offs between natural climate solutions and Sustainable Development Goals
    Mariani, Gael
    Moullec, Fabien
    Atwood, Trisha B.
    Clarkson, Beverley
    Conant, Richard T.
    Cullen-Unsworth, Leanne
    Griscom, Bronson
    Gutt, Julian
    Howard, Jennifer
    Krause-Jensen, Dorte
    Leavitt, Sara M.
    Lee, Shing Yip
    Livesley, Stephen J.
    Macreadie, Peter, I
    St-John, Michael
    Zganjar, Chris
    Cheung, William W. L.
    Duarte, Carlos M.
    Shin, Yunne-Jai
    Singh, Gerald G.
    Loiseau, Nicolas
    Troussellier, Marc
    Mouillot, David
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 22 (10)
  • [25] Co-benefits and trade-offs between biodiversity, carbon storage and water flow regulation
    Onaindia, Miren
    Fernandez de Manuel, Beatriz
    Madariaga, Iosu
    Rodriguez-Loinaz, Gloria
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 289 : 1 - 9
  • [26] Toward an Understanding of Synergies and Trade-Offs Between Water, Energy, and Food SDG Targets
    Fader, Marianela
    Cranmer, Colleen
    Lawford, Richard
    Engel-Cox, Jill
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2018, 6
  • [27] Co-benefits and trade-offs of climate change mitigation actions and the Sustainable Development Goals (vol 26, pg 805, 2021)
    Cohen, Brett
    Cowie, Annette
    Babiker, Mustafa
    Leip, Adrian
    Smith, Pete
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2022, 30 : 1096 - 1097
  • [28] Co-benefits, trade-offs, barriers and policies for greenhouse gas mitigation in the agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU) sector
    Bustamante, Mercedes
    Robledo-Abad, Carmenza
    Harper, Richard
    Mbow, Cheikh
    Ravindranat, Nijavalli H.
    Sperling, Frank
    Haberl, Helmut
    Pinto, Alexandre de Siqueira
    Smith, Pete
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2014, 20 (10) : 3270 - 3290
  • [29] Scenarios for the environmental impact of fossil fuel power: Co-benefits and trade-offs of carbon capture and storage
    Singh, Bhawna
    Stromman, Anders H.
    Hertwich, Edgar G.
    ENERGY, 2012, 45 (01) : 762 - 770
  • [30] Smart cities and sustainable development goals (SDGs): A systematic literature review of co-benefits and trade-offs
    Sharifi, Ayyoob
    Allam, Zaheer
    Bibri, Simon Elias
    Khavarian-Garmsir, Amir Reza
    CITIES, 2024, 146