Sustainability transitions in the agri-food system: Evaluating mitigation potentials, economy-wide effects, co-benefits and trade-offs for the case of Austria

被引:0
|
作者
Preinfalk, Eva [1 ]
Bednar-Friedl, Birgit [1 ,2 ]
Mayer, Jakob [1 ]
Lauk, Christian [3 ]
Mayer, Andreas [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Karl Franzens Univ Graz, Wegener Ctr Climate & Global Change, Brandhofgasse 5, A-8010 Graz, Austria
[2] Karl Franzens Univ Graz, Inst Econ, Univ Str 15, A-8010 Graz, Austria
[3] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci Vienna, Inst Social Ecol, Dept Econ & Social Sci, Schottenfeldgasse 29, A-1070 Vienna, Austria
[4] Univ Innsbruck, Dept Geog, Innrain 52f, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
关键词
Agri-Food System; GHG Mitigation; Afforestation; Sustainability Transition; Macroeconomic Effect; Co-Benefits; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; LAND-USE; COMPLEMENTARITY-PROBLEMS; AGRICULTURE; IMPACTS; STRATEGIES; LIVESTOCK; SCENARIOS; DECLINE; DEMAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108357
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
As a major source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and with a substantial potential of carbon storage, agriculture and food (agri-food) systems play a two-fold role in achieving the Paris goal of well below 2degree celsius of global warming. Against this background, this paper assesses the mitigation potentials, economic effects, co-benefits and trade-offs of biophysically feasible transitions of the Austrian agri-food system. By combining biophysical accounting with a comparative-static multi-sectoral computable general equilibrium model, we assess both supply- and demand-side driven transition scenarios. These scenarios entail substantial changes in the Austrian agri-food system, mitigating between 70 and 110% of GHG emissions relative to the reference pathway in 2050, with lower emission intensities from agricultural practices and enhanced sinks through afforestation. Two out of three scenarios lead to economy-wide costs of up to 1% of gross domestic product. Despite these small changes at the macroeconomic scale, output effects within the Austrian agri-food sectors are substantial, with primary production and manufacturing of plant-based products emerging as winners in terms of sectoral revenue, while animal-based primary production and manufacturing lose. The agri-food system transitions considered create health co-benefits, but reveal trade-offs between mitigation potentials, biodiversity conservation and economic effects.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Potential Co-benefits and trade-offs between improved soil management, climate change mitigation and agri-food productivity
    McGuire, Ryan
    Williams, Paul N.
    Smith, Pete
    McGrath, Steve P.
    Curry, Donald
    Donnison, Iain
    Emmet, Bridget
    Scollan, Nigel
    FOOD AND ENERGY SECURITY, 2022, 11 (02):
  • [2] From Food Subsidies to Cash Transfers: Assessing Economy-Wide Benefits and Trade-Offs in Egypt
    Breisinger, Clemens
    Kassim, Yumna
    Kurdi, Sikandra
    Randriamamonjy, Josee
    Thurlow, James
    JOURNAL OF AFRICAN ECONOMIES, 2024, 33 (02) : 109 - 129
  • [3] Potentials, Limitations, Co-Benefits, and Trade-Offs of Biochar Applications to Soils for Climate Change Mitigation
    Tisserant, Alexandre
    Cherubini, Francesco
    LAND, 2019, 8 (12)
  • [4] Co-benefits and trade-offs of agroforestry for climate change mitigation and other sustainability goals in West Africa
    Tschora, Heloise
    Cherubini, Francesco
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2020, 22
  • [5] Agrivoltaics as an SDG enabler: Trade-offs and co-benefits for food security, energy generation and emissions mitigation
    Pandey, Ganesh
    Lyden, Sarah
    Franklin, Evan
    Harrison, Matthew Tom
    RESOURCES ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 19
  • [6] Co-benefits and Trade-Offs From Agro-Food System Redesign for Circularity: A Case Study With the FAN Agent-Based Model
    Fernandez-Mena, Hugo
    MacDonald, Graham K.
    Pellerin, Sylvain
    Nesme, Thomas
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2020, 4