Agrivoltaics as an SDG enabler: Trade-offs and co-benefits for food security, energy generation and emissions mitigation

被引:1
|
作者
Pandey, Ganesh [1 ]
Lyden, Sarah [1 ]
Franklin, Evan [1 ]
Harrison, Matthew Tom [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Sch Engn, Hobart, Tas 7005, Australia
[2] Univ Tasmania, Tasmanian Inst Agr, Launceston, Tas 7248, Australia
关键词
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs); Trade-offs and co-benefits; Agrivoltaic system (AVS); Livestock based AVS; Greenhouse gas; Climate action; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; DECISION-SUPPORT TOOL; CONDITION SCORE; LAND-USE; PASTURE; PRODUCTIVITY; MANAGEMENT; POLICIES; IMPACT; PANELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.resenv.2024.100186
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Agrivoltaic systems (AVS) - wherein solar photovoltaics (PV) and agriculture are co-located on the same land parcel - offer a sustainable approach to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by enabling concurrent renewable electricity and agri-food production. Here, we elucidate plausible co-benefits and tradeoffs of agri-food production and electricity generation in AVS across manifold socio-enviro-economic contexts, with the aim of understanding the contextualized interplay between AVS implementation and progress towards the SDGs. We modeled three AVS designs with varying solar panel densities (high, mid, low) at case study locations in Australia, Chad, and Iran using various models (System Advisor Model for PV and GrassGro for livestock systems). The findings suggest that in regions conducive to high biomass production per unit area, such as in parts of Australia, AVS design with high solar panel density can reduce meat production by almost 50%, which can jeopardize food security and impede achieving SDG 2 (Zero Hunger). In these regions, AVS design with low solar panel density enables meeting SDGs aligned with agri-food production and renewable energy generation. In contrast, in semi-arid regions, such as Iran, AVS design with a high density of solar panels can improve agricultural production via the alleviation of water deficit, thereby supporting the prioritization of solar power generation, with food production as a co-benefit. In developing countries such as Chad, AVS can enhance economic development by providing electricity, food, and financial benefits. We call for policymakers to incentivize AVS deployment in such regions and stimulate public and private investment to enable progress towards SDGs.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Co-benefits and trade-offs of climate change mitigation actions and the Sustainable Development Goals
    Cohen, Brett
    Cowie, Annette
    Babiker, Mustafa
    Leip, Adrian
    Smith, Pete
    Sustainable Production and Consumption, 2021, 26 : 805 - 813
  • [2] Co-benefits and trade-offs of climate change mitigation actions and the Sustainable Development Goals
    Cohen, Brett
    Cowie, Annette
    Babiker, Mustafa
    Leip, Adrian
    Smith, Pete
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2021, 26 : 805 - 813
  • [3] Compound environmental impact of urban mitigation strategies: Co-benefits, trade-offs, and unintended consequence
    Wang, Zhi-Hua
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2021, 75
  • [4] Review of trade-offs and co-benefits from greenhouse gas mitigation measures in agricultural production
    Verspecht, Ann
    Vandermeulen, Valerie
    Ter Avest, Erik
    Van Huylenbroeck, Guido
    JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2012, 9 : 147 - 157
  • [5] Potentials, Limitations, Co-Benefits, and Trade-Offs of Biochar Applications to Soils for Climate Change Mitigation
    Tisserant, Alexandre
    Cherubini, Francesco
    LAND, 2019, 8 (12)
  • [6] Co-benefits and trade-offs in the water-energy nexus of irrigation modernization in China
    Cremades, Roger
    Rothausen, Sabrina G. S. A.
    Conway, Declan
    Zou, Xiaoxia
    Wang, Jinxia
    Li, Yu'e
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 11 (05):
  • [7] Potential Co-benefits and trade-offs between improved soil management, climate change mitigation and agri-food productivity
    McGuire, Ryan
    Williams, Paul N.
    Smith, Pete
    McGrath, Steve P.
    Curry, Donald
    Donnison, Iain
    Emmet, Bridget
    Scollan, Nigel
    FOOD AND ENERGY SECURITY, 2022, 11 (02):
  • [8] Co-benefits and trade-offs of agroforestry for climate change mitigation and other sustainability goals in West Africa
    Tschora, Heloise
    Cherubini, Francesco
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2020, 22
  • [9] Health co-benefits and trade-offs of carbon pricing: a narrative synthesis
    Cuevas, Soledad
    Nachtigall, Daniel
    Jaber, Aimee Aguilar
    Belesova, Kristine
    Falconer, Jane
    Haines, Andy
    Reynolds, Tamzin
    Schuster, Tobias Magnus
    Whitmee, Sarah
    Green, Rosemary
    CLIMATE POLICY, 2024, 24 (10) : 1346 - 1364
  • [10] Agricultural productivity and greenhouse gas emissions: trade-offs or synergies between mitigation and food security?
    Valin, H.
    Havlik, P.
    Mosnier, A.
    Herrero, M.
    Schmid, E.
    Obersteiner, M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2013, 8 (03):