Agrivoltaics as an SDG enabler: Trade-offs and co-benefits for food security, energy generation and emissions mitigation

被引:1
|
作者
Pandey, Ganesh [1 ]
Lyden, Sarah [1 ]
Franklin, Evan [1 ]
Harrison, Matthew Tom [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Sch Engn, Hobart, Tas 7005, Australia
[2] Univ Tasmania, Tasmanian Inst Agr, Launceston, Tas 7248, Australia
关键词
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs); Trade-offs and co-benefits; Agrivoltaic system (AVS); Livestock based AVS; Greenhouse gas; Climate action; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; DECISION-SUPPORT TOOL; CONDITION SCORE; LAND-USE; PASTURE; PRODUCTIVITY; MANAGEMENT; POLICIES; IMPACT; PANELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.resenv.2024.100186
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Agrivoltaic systems (AVS) - wherein solar photovoltaics (PV) and agriculture are co-located on the same land parcel - offer a sustainable approach to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by enabling concurrent renewable electricity and agri-food production. Here, we elucidate plausible co-benefits and tradeoffs of agri-food production and electricity generation in AVS across manifold socio-enviro-economic contexts, with the aim of understanding the contextualized interplay between AVS implementation and progress towards the SDGs. We modeled three AVS designs with varying solar panel densities (high, mid, low) at case study locations in Australia, Chad, and Iran using various models (System Advisor Model for PV and GrassGro for livestock systems). The findings suggest that in regions conducive to high biomass production per unit area, such as in parts of Australia, AVS design with high solar panel density can reduce meat production by almost 50%, which can jeopardize food security and impede achieving SDG 2 (Zero Hunger). In these regions, AVS design with low solar panel density enables meeting SDGs aligned with agri-food production and renewable energy generation. In contrast, in semi-arid regions, such as Iran, AVS design with a high density of solar panels can improve agricultural production via the alleviation of water deficit, thereby supporting the prioritization of solar power generation, with food production as a co-benefit. In developing countries such as Chad, AVS can enhance economic development by providing electricity, food, and financial benefits. We call for policymakers to incentivize AVS deployment in such regions and stimulate public and private investment to enable progress towards SDGs.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Enhanced rock weathering: biological climate change mitigation with co-benefits for food security?
    Beerling, David J.
    BIOLOGY LETTERS, 2017, 13 (04)
  • [32] Tackling unintended consequences of grazing livestock farming: Multi-scale assessment of co-benefits and trade-offs for water pollution mitigation scenarios
    Zhang, Yusheng
    Griffith, Bruce
    Granger, Steve
    Sint, Hadewij
    Collins, Adrian L.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 336
  • [33] Multi-objective Optimisation Framework for Assessment of Trade-Offs between Benefits and Co-benefits of Nature-based Solutions
    Yang, Shengnan
    Ruangpan, Laddaporn
    Torres, Arlex Sanchez
    Vojinovic, Zoran
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2023, 37 (6-7) : 2325 - 2345
  • [34] Multi-objective Optimisation Framework for Assessment of Trade-Offs between Benefits and Co-benefits of Nature-based Solutions
    Shengnan Yang
    Laddaporn Ruangpan
    Arlex Sanchez Torres
    Zoran Vojinovic
    Water Resources Management, 2023, 37 : 2325 - 2345
  • [35] Quantifying Co-Benefits and Trade-Offs between Forest Ecosystem Services in the Gan River Basin of South China
    Dai, Erfu
    Wang, Xiaoli
    Zhu, Jianjia
    Tian, Qing
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (14)
  • [36] Co-benefits and trade-offs of environmental pressures: A case study of Zhejiang's socio-economic evolution
    Zhang, Shuo
    Wang, Dong
    Hong, Liyun
    Ren, Hongtao
    Feng, Cuiyang
    Liang, Yuhan
    Kharrazi, Ali
    Yu, Yadong
    Liang, Sai
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 255
  • [37] Catchment zoning to enhance co-benefits and minimize trade-offs between ecosystem services and freshwater biodiversity conservation
    Hermoso, Virgilio
    Cattarino, Lorenzo
    Linke, Simon
    Kennard, Mark J.
    AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2018, 28 (04) : 1004 - 1014
  • [38] Co-benefits and Trade-Offs From Agro-Food System Redesign for Circularity: A Case Study With the FAN Agent-Based Model
    Fernandez-Mena, Hugo
    MacDonald, Graham K.
    Pellerin, Sylvain
    Nesme, Thomas
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2020, 4
  • [39] Bioenergy, food security and poverty reduction: trade-offs and synergies along the water-energy-food security nexus
    Mirzabaev, Alisher
    Guta, Dawit
    Goedecke, Jann
    Gaur, Varun
    Boerner, Jan
    Virchow, Detlef
    Denich, Manfred
    von Braun, Joachim
    WATER INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 40 (5-6) : 772 - 790
  • [40] Exploring Win-Wins from Trade-Offs? Co-Benefits of Coalbed Methane Utilization for the Environment, Economy and Safety
    Wang B.
    Li Z.
    Shi R.
    Zhang Y.
    Yao Y.
    Energy Engineering: Journal of the Association of Energy Engineering, 2022, 119 (06): : 2469 - 2487