Agrivoltaics as an SDG enabler: Trade-offs and co-benefits for food security, energy generation and emissions mitigation

被引:1
|
作者
Pandey, Ganesh [1 ]
Lyden, Sarah [1 ]
Franklin, Evan [1 ]
Harrison, Matthew Tom [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Sch Engn, Hobart, Tas 7005, Australia
[2] Univ Tasmania, Tasmanian Inst Agr, Launceston, Tas 7248, Australia
关键词
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs); Trade-offs and co-benefits; Agrivoltaic system (AVS); Livestock based AVS; Greenhouse gas; Climate action; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; DECISION-SUPPORT TOOL; CONDITION SCORE; LAND-USE; PASTURE; PRODUCTIVITY; MANAGEMENT; POLICIES; IMPACT; PANELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.resenv.2024.100186
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Agrivoltaic systems (AVS) - wherein solar photovoltaics (PV) and agriculture are co-located on the same land parcel - offer a sustainable approach to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by enabling concurrent renewable electricity and agri-food production. Here, we elucidate plausible co-benefits and tradeoffs of agri-food production and electricity generation in AVS across manifold socio-enviro-economic contexts, with the aim of understanding the contextualized interplay between AVS implementation and progress towards the SDGs. We modeled three AVS designs with varying solar panel densities (high, mid, low) at case study locations in Australia, Chad, and Iran using various models (System Advisor Model for PV and GrassGro for livestock systems). The findings suggest that in regions conducive to high biomass production per unit area, such as in parts of Australia, AVS design with high solar panel density can reduce meat production by almost 50%, which can jeopardize food security and impede achieving SDG 2 (Zero Hunger). In these regions, AVS design with low solar panel density enables meeting SDGs aligned with agri-food production and renewable energy generation. In contrast, in semi-arid regions, such as Iran, AVS design with a high density of solar panels can improve agricultural production via the alleviation of water deficit, thereby supporting the prioritization of solar power generation, with food production as a co-benefit. In developing countries such as Chad, AVS can enhance economic development by providing electricity, food, and financial benefits. We call for policymakers to incentivize AVS deployment in such regions and stimulate public and private investment to enable progress towards SDGs.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Enhancing nature-based solutions acceptance through stakeholders' engagement in co-benefits identification and trade-offs analysis
    Giordano, R.
    Pluchinotta, I.
    Pagano, A.
    Scrieciu, A.
    Nanu, F.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 713 (713)
  • [42] Identifying trade-offs and co-benefits of climate policies in China to align policies with SDGs and achieve the 2°C goal
    Liu, Jing-Yu
    Fujimori, Shinichiro
    Takahashi, Kiyoshi
    Hasegawa, Tomoko
    Wu, Wenchao
    Takakura, Jun'ya
    Masui, Toshihiko
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 14 (12)
  • [43] Integrated crop–livestock–bioenergy system brings co-benefits and trade-offs in mitigating the environmental impacts of Chinese agriculture
    Jiahao Xing
    Junnian Song
    Chaoshuo Liu
    Wei Yang
    Haiyan Duan
    Helmut Yabar
    Jingzheng Ren
    Nature Food, 2022, 3 : 1052 - 1064
  • [44] Life cycle assessment demonstrates environmental co-benefits and trade-offs of low-carbon electricity supply options
    Gibon, Thomas
    Arvesen, Anders
    Hertwich, Edgar G.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 76 : 1283 - 1290
  • [45] Balancing co-benefits and trade-offs between climate change mitigation and adaptation innovations under mixed crop-livestock systems in semi-arid Zimbabwe
    Homann-Kee Tui, Sabine
    Valdivia, Roberto O.
    Descheemaeker, Katrien
    Sisito, Gevious
    Moyo, Elisha N.
    Mapanda, Farai
    CABI AGRICULTURE & BIOSCIENCE, 2023, 4 (01):
  • [46] Balancing co-benefits and trade-offs between climate change mitigation and adaptation innovations under mixed crop-livestock systems in semi-arid Zimbabwe
    Sabine Homann-Kee Tui
    Roberto O. Valdivia
    Katrien Descheemaeker
    Gevious Sisito
    Elisha N. Moyo
    Farai Mapanda
    CABI Agriculture and Bioscience, 4
  • [47] Life-cycle assessment to unravel co-benefits and trade-offs of large-scale biochar deployment in Norwegian agriculture
    Tisserant, Alexandre
    Morales, Marjorie
    Cavalett, Otavio
    O'Toole, Adam
    Weldon, Simon P.
    Rasse, Daniel P.
    Cherubini, Francesco
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2022, 179
  • [48] Integrated crop-livestock-bioenergy system brings co-benefits and trade-offs in mitigating the environmental impacts of Chinese agriculture
    Xing, Jiahao
    Song, Junnian
    Liu, Chaoshuo
    Yang, Wei
    Duan, Haiyan
    Yabar, Helmut
    Ren, Jingzheng
    NATURE FOOD, 2022, 3 (12): : 1052 - 1064
  • [49] Modeling an emissions peak in China around 2030: Synergies or trade-offs between economy, energy and climate security
    Chai Qi-Min
    Xu Hua-Qing
    ADVANCES IN CLIMATE CHANGE RESEARCH, 2014, 5 (04) : 169 - 180
  • [50] Modeling an emissions peak in China around 2030: Synergies or trade-offs between economy, energy and climate security
    CHAI Qi-Min
    XU Hua-Qing
    Advances in Climate Change Research, 2014, (04) : 169 - 180