Comparative clinical efficacy of percutaneous coaxial large-channel endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective study

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Zige [1 ]
Yang, Tianxiang [2 ]
Li, Jun [2 ]
Chen, Desheng [3 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Med Univ, Sch Clin Med, Nanning 530000, Peoples R China
[2] Ningxia Med Univ, Sch Clin Med, Yinchuan 750000, Peoples R China
[3] Ningxia Med Univ, Peoples Hosp Ningxia Hui Autonomous Reg, Dept Orthoped Surg, Yinchuan 750000, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Percutaneous coaxial large-channel endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis; Clinical efficacy; Retrospective study; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; DECOMPRESSION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-024-07608-6
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of percutaneous coaxial large-channel endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (PCLE-LIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. The clinical data of patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis who underwent PCLE-LIF (experimental group) and TLIF (control group) surgery from September 2019 to September 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. We collected clinical data and compared the two groups in terms of perioperative parameters, treatment response rate, inflammatory response markers, postoperative complications, postoperative pain, and functional recovery. The results showed that the treatment outcomes in the experimental group were significantly better than those in the control group. Specifically, perioperative parameters and inflammatory response markers in the experimental group were significantly better than those in the control group, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). The overall treatment response rate in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, the incidence of postoperative complications in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group, postoperative VAS pain scores and ODI functional scores were lower, and postoperative JOA functional scores were higher than those in the control group, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). In conclusion, PCLE-LIF appears to be a promising technique with better clinical outcomes in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of clinical and radiological results of posterolateral fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion techniques in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine
    Audat, Z.
    Moutasem, O.
    Yousef, K.
    Mohammad, B.
    SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 53 (03) : 183 - 187
  • [42] Comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation: A retrospective study
    Li, Liqiang
    Liu, Yueju
    Zhang, Peng
    Lei, Tao
    Li, Jie
    Shen, Yong
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2016, 44 (06) : 1424 - 1429
  • [43] Lumbar percutaneous endoscopic interbody fusion
    Leu, HF
    Hauser, RK
    Schreiber, A
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1997, (337) : 58 - 63
  • [44] Lumbar degenerative disease treated by percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion or minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a case-matched comparative study (vol 16, 696, 2021)
    Xue, You-Di
    Diao, Wen-Bo
    Ma, Chao
    Li, Jie
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [45] Comparing the efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Luan, Haopeng
    Peng, Cong
    Liu, Kai
    Song, Xinghua
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [46] Comparing the efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Haopeng Luan
    Cong Peng
    Kai Liu
    Xinghua Song
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 18
  • [47] Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Ploumis, Avraam
    Wu, Chunhui
    Fischer, Gustav
    Mehbod, Amir A.
    Wu, Wentien
    Faundez, Antonio
    Transfeldt, Ensor E.
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2008, 21 (02): : 120 - 125
  • [48] Comparison of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Direct Lumbar Interbody Fusion : Clinical and Radiological Results
    Lee, Young Seok
    Kim, Young Baeg
    Park, Seung Won
    Chung, Chan
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 56 (06) : 469 - 474
  • [49] A retrospective controlled study protocol of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion compared with posterior lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis
    Yi, Ping
    Tang, Xiangsheng
    Yang, Feng
    Tan, Mingsheng
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (44) : E22878
  • [50] Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Cesare Faldini
    Raffaele Borghi
    Mohammadreza Chehrassan
    Fabrizio Perna
    Federico Pilla
    Francesco Traina
    European Spine Journal, 2017, 26 : 429 - 430