Comparative clinical efficacy of percutaneous coaxial large-channel endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective study

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Zige [1 ]
Yang, Tianxiang [2 ]
Li, Jun [2 ]
Chen, Desheng [3 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Med Univ, Sch Clin Med, Nanning 530000, Peoples R China
[2] Ningxia Med Univ, Sch Clin Med, Yinchuan 750000, Peoples R China
[3] Ningxia Med Univ, Peoples Hosp Ningxia Hui Autonomous Reg, Dept Orthoped Surg, Yinchuan 750000, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Percutaneous coaxial large-channel endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis; Clinical efficacy; Retrospective study; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; DECOMPRESSION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-024-07608-6
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of percutaneous coaxial large-channel endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (PCLE-LIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. The clinical data of patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis who underwent PCLE-LIF (experimental group) and TLIF (control group) surgery from September 2019 to September 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. We collected clinical data and compared the two groups in terms of perioperative parameters, treatment response rate, inflammatory response markers, postoperative complications, postoperative pain, and functional recovery. The results showed that the treatment outcomes in the experimental group were significantly better than those in the control group. Specifically, perioperative parameters and inflammatory response markers in the experimental group were significantly better than those in the control group, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). The overall treatment response rate in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, the incidence of postoperative complications in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group, postoperative VAS pain scores and ODI functional scores were lower, and postoperative JOA functional scores were higher than those in the control group, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). In conclusion, PCLE-LIF appears to be a promising technique with better clinical outcomes in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion vs. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Gao, Quan-You
    Wei, Fei-Long
    Li, Tian
    Zhu, Kai-Long
    Du, Ming-Rui
    Heng, Wei
    Yang, Fan
    Gao, Hao-Ran
    Qian, Ji-Xian
    Zhou, Cheng-Pei
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [32] Which procedure is better for lumbar interbody fusion: anterior lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion?
    Jiang, Sheng-Dan
    Chen, Jiang-Wei
    Jiang, Lei-Sheng
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2012, 132 (09) : 1259 - 1266
  • [33] Indirect decompression via oblique lateral interbody fusion for severe degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a comparative study with direct decompression transforaminal/posterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Shimizu, Takayoshi
    Fujibayashi, Shunsuke
    Otsuki, Bungo
    Murata, Koichi
    Matsuda, Shuichi
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 21 (06): : 963 - 971
  • [34] Early Clinical Evaluation of Percutaneous Full-endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Pedicle Screw Insertion for Treating Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Zhao, Xiao-bing
    Ma, Hai-jun
    Geng, Bin
    Zhou, Hong-gang
    Xia, Ya-yi
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2021, 13 (01) : 328 - 337
  • [35] Unilateral biportal endoscopic versus microscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a retrospective study
    Arunakul, Rattalerk
    Anumas, Suthiya
    Pattharanitima, Pattharawin
    Susrivaraput, Chananyu
    Pholsawatchai, Waroot
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2024, 19 (01):
  • [36] Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technique Note and Comparison of Early Outcomes with Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Zhang, Hao
    Zhou, Chuanli
    Wang, Chao
    Zhu, Kai
    Tu, Qihao
    Kong, Meng
    Zhao, Chong
    Ma, Xuexiao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE, 2021, 14 : 549 - 558
  • [37] Lumbar spinal fusions: A retrospective comparision of combined anterior/posterior fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion, and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Wu, JA
    Laiwalla, UZ
    Wang, JC
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2006, 54 (01) : S117 - S117
  • [38] Management of lumbar spondylolisthesis: A retrospective analysis of posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Santos, Daniel Encarnacion
    Nurmukhametov, Renat
    Donasov, Medet
    Volovich, Alexander
    Bozkurt, Ismail
    Wellington, Jack
    Lendof, Miguel Espinal
    Peralta, Ismael
    Chaurasia, Bipin
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOVERTEBRAL JUNCTION AND SPINE, 2024, 15 (01): : 99 - 104
  • [39] Posterolateral lumbar fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis
    Li, Fang-cai
    Chen, Qi-xin
    Chen, Wei-shan
    Xu, Kan
    Wu, Qiong-hua
    Chen, Gang
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 20 (09) : 1241 - 1245
  • [40] Clinical Efficacy of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Dong, YiBo
    Wang, YongTao
    Yu, Yang
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2025, 193 : 98 - 99