Comparative clinical efficacy of percutaneous coaxial large-channel endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective study

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Zige [1 ]
Yang, Tianxiang [2 ]
Li, Jun [2 ]
Chen, Desheng [3 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Med Univ, Sch Clin Med, Nanning 530000, Peoples R China
[2] Ningxia Med Univ, Sch Clin Med, Yinchuan 750000, Peoples R China
[3] Ningxia Med Univ, Peoples Hosp Ningxia Hui Autonomous Reg, Dept Orthoped Surg, Yinchuan 750000, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Percutaneous coaxial large-channel endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis; Clinical efficacy; Retrospective study; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; DECOMPRESSION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-024-07608-6
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of percutaneous coaxial large-channel endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (PCLE-LIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. The clinical data of patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis who underwent PCLE-LIF (experimental group) and TLIF (control group) surgery from September 2019 to September 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. We collected clinical data and compared the two groups in terms of perioperative parameters, treatment response rate, inflammatory response markers, postoperative complications, postoperative pain, and functional recovery. The results showed that the treatment outcomes in the experimental group were significantly better than those in the control group. Specifically, perioperative parameters and inflammatory response markers in the experimental group were significantly better than those in the control group, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). The overall treatment response rate in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, the incidence of postoperative complications in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group, postoperative VAS pain scores and ODI functional scores were lower, and postoperative JOA functional scores were higher than those in the control group, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). In conclusion, PCLE-LIF appears to be a promising technique with better clinical outcomes in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: is it worth it?
    Frederic Jacquot
    Daniel Gastambide
    International Orthopaedics, 2013, 37 : 1507 - 1510
  • [22] Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: is it worth it?
    Jacquot, Frederic
    Gastambide, Daniel
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2013, 37 (08) : 1507 - 1510
  • [23] Comparative analysis of clinical efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative
    Ma, Tao
    Tu, Xiaoshuang
    Li, Junyang
    Geng, Yongcun
    Wu, Jingwei
    Chen, Senlin
    Yan, Dengming
    Jiang, Ming
    Gao, Gongming
    Nong, Luming
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2025, 12
  • [25] Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion, Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion, and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Hu, Xijian
    Yan, Lei
    Jin, Xinjie
    Liu, Haifeng
    Chai, Jing
    Zhao, Bin
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 14 (01) : 295 - 305
  • [26] Surgery for degenerative lumbar disease: transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Grob, Dieter
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2009, 18 (12) : 1991 - 1992
  • [27] Surgery for degenerative lumbar disease: transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Dieter Grob
    European Spine Journal, 2009, 18 : 1991 - 1992
  • [28] Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Single-Center Retrospective Comparative Study
    Du, Xing
    She, Yuxiao
    Ou, Yunsheng
    Zhu, Yong
    Luo, Wei
    Jiang, Dianming
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 2021 : 6693446
  • [29] Comparison of Outcomes Between Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients With Single-Level Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Retrospective Study
    Xu, Hongyao
    Yu, Lei
    Xiao, Bing
    Zhao, Hong
    Gu, Xin
    Gao, Zengxin
    Wang, Weiheng
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 183 : E98 - E108
  • [30] Which procedure is better for lumbar interbody fusion: anterior lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion?
    Sheng-Dan Jiang
    Jiang-Wei Chen
    Lei-Sheng Jiang
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2012, 132 : 1259 - 1266