Comparative clinical efficacy of percutaneous coaxial large-channel endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective study

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Zige [1 ]
Yang, Tianxiang [2 ]
Li, Jun [2 ]
Chen, Desheng [3 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Med Univ, Sch Clin Med, Nanning 530000, Peoples R China
[2] Ningxia Med Univ, Sch Clin Med, Yinchuan 750000, Peoples R China
[3] Ningxia Med Univ, Peoples Hosp Ningxia Hui Autonomous Reg, Dept Orthoped Surg, Yinchuan 750000, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Percutaneous coaxial large-channel endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis; Clinical efficacy; Retrospective study; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; DECOMPRESSION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-024-07608-6
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of percutaneous coaxial large-channel endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (PCLE-LIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. The clinical data of patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis who underwent PCLE-LIF (experimental group) and TLIF (control group) surgery from September 2019 to September 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. We collected clinical data and compared the two groups in terms of perioperative parameters, treatment response rate, inflammatory response markers, postoperative complications, postoperative pain, and functional recovery. The results showed that the treatment outcomes in the experimental group were significantly better than those in the control group. Specifically, perioperative parameters and inflammatory response markers in the experimental group were significantly better than those in the control group, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). The overall treatment response rate in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, the incidence of postoperative complications in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group, postoperative VAS pain scores and ODI functional scores were lower, and postoperative JOA functional scores were higher than those in the control group, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). In conclusion, PCLE-LIF appears to be a promising technique with better clinical outcomes in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Innovative Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Degenerative Instability: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial
    Yin, Peng
    Ding, Yi
    Zhou, Lijin
    Xu, Chunyang
    Gao, Haifeng
    Pang, Daming
    Hai, Yong
    Yang, Jincai
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2021, 14 : 3685 - 3693
  • [12] Lumbar degenerative disease treated by percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion or minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a case-matched comparative study
    You-Di Xue
    Wen-Bo Diao
    Chao Ma
    Jie Li
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 16
  • [13] Comparison of hidden blood loss and clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Meng Ge
    Yuan Zhang
    Hang Ying
    Chenchen Feng
    Yanlei Li
    Jinlong Tian
    Tingxiao Zhao
    Haiyu Shao
    Yazeng Huang
    International Orthopaedics, 2022, 46 : 2063 - 2070
  • [14] Comparison of hidden blood loss and clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Ge, Meng
    Zhang, Yuan
    Ying, Hang
    Feng, Chenchen
    Li, Yanlei
    Tian, Jinlong
    Zhao, Tingxiao
    Shao, Haiyu
    Huang, Yazeng
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2022, 46 (09) : 2063 - 2070
  • [15] A single-arm retrospective study of the clinical efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis
    Wang, Xiangbin
    Tian, Zheng
    Mansuerjiang, Maiwulan
    Younusi, Aikebaier
    Xu, Leilei
    Xiang, Haibin
    Cao, Li
    Wang, Chong
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2023, 9
  • [16] Is Full-Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Superior to Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis? A Retrospective Study
    Yin, Jianjian
    Jiang, Xijia
    Xu, Nanwei
    Nong, Luming
    Jiang, Yuqing
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART A-CENTRAL EUROPEAN NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 85 (01) : 39 - 47
  • [17] Clinical Outcomes of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Three-Level Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Fan, Guoxin
    Wu, Xinbo
    Yu, Shunzhi
    Sun, Qi
    Guan, Xiaofei
    Zhang, Hailong
    Gu, Xin
    He, Shisheng
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 2016
  • [18] Correction to: Lumbar degenerative disease treated by percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion or minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a case-matched comparative study
    You-Di Xue
    Wen-Bo Diao
    Chao Ma
    Jie Li
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 17
  • [19] Comparative efficacy and fusion outcomes of unilateral bi-portal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in treating single-segment degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with lumbar spinal stenosis: a two-year retrospective study
    Bahir, Abdul Waheed
    Wang, Daxing
    Xiao, Jiayu
    Liu, Bailian
    Gu, Shao
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2024, 19 (01):
  • [20] A Comparative Study of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Pawar, Abhijit Y.
    Hughes, Alexander P.
    Sama, Andrew A.
    Girardi, Federico P.
    Lebl, Darren R.
    Cammisa, Frank P.
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 9 (05) : 668 - 674