Self-selection bias of similarity metrics in translation memory evaluation

被引:1
|
作者
Wolff, Friedel [1 ]
Pretorius, Laurette [1 ]
Dugast, Loic [1 ]
Buitelaar, Paul [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Africa, AALS, Coll Grad Studies, Pretoria, South Africa
[2] Natl Univ Ireland, INSIGHT Ctr Data Analyt, Galway, Ireland
基金
爱尔兰科学基金会;
关键词
Translation memory; Evaluation; Bias; Text similarity;
D O I
10.1007/s10590-016-9185-8
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
A translation memory system attempts to retrieve useful suggestions from previous translations to assist a translator in a new translation task. While assisting the translator with a specific segment, some similarity metric is usually employed to select the best matches from previously translated segments to present to a translator. Automated methods for evaluating a translation memory system usually use reference translations and some similarity metric. Such evaluation methods might be expected to assist in choosing between competing systems. No single evaluation method has gained widespread use; additionally the similarity metric used in each of these methods is not standardised either. This paper investigates the consequences of substituting the similarity metric in such an evaluation method, and finds that the similarity metrics exhibit a strong bias for the system using the same metric for retrieval. Consequently the choice of similarity metric in the evaluation of translation memory systems should be carefully reconsidered.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 144
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Volunteerism and self-selection bias in human positron emission tomography neuroimaging research
    Oswald, Lynn M.
    Wand, Gary S.
    Zhu, Shijun
    Selby, Victoria
    BRAIN IMAGING AND BEHAVIOR, 2013, 7 (02) : 163 - 176
  • [42] Do schizophrenic subjects who consent to imaging show a self-selection bias?
    Armenakis, AD
    Anzalone, S
    Poole, JH
    Deicken, R
    Vinogradov, S
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 51 (08) : 110S - 111S
  • [43] Self-Selection Bias: An Essential Design Consideration for Nutrition Trials in Healthy Populations
    Young, Lauren M.
    Gauci, Sarah
    Scholey, Andrew
    White, David J.
    Pipingas, Andrew
    FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION, 2020, 7
  • [44] THE TRIPLE OPTION CHOICE - SELF-SELECTION BIAS IN TRADITIONAL COVERAGE, HMOS, AND PPOS
    STRUMWASSER, I
    PARANJPE, NV
    RONIS, DL
    MCGINNIS, J
    KEE, DW
    HALL, HL
    INQUIRY-THE JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION PROVISION AND FINANCING, 1989, 26 (04) : 432 - 441
  • [45] BIAS IN ESTIMATES OF DISCRIMINATION AND DEFAULT IN MORTGAGE LENDING - THE EFFECTS OF SIMULTANEITY AND SELF-SELECTION
    YEZER, AMJ
    PHILLIPS, RF
    TROST, RP
    JOURNAL OF REAL ESTATE FINANCE AND ECONOMICS, 1994, 9 (03): : 197 - 215
  • [46] What Makes a Good Fisherman? Linear Regression under Self-Selection Bias
    Cherapanamjeri, Yeshwanth
    Daskalakis, Constantinos
    Ilyas, Andrew
    Zampetakis, Manolis
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 55TH ANNUAL ACM SYMPOSIUM ON THEORY OF COMPUTING, STOC 2023, 2023, : 1699 - 1712
  • [47] Victim-Offender Mediation and Reduced Reoffending: Gauging the Self-Selection Bias
    Jonas-van Dijk, Jiska
    Zebel, Sven
    Claessen, Jacques
    Nelen, Hans
    CRIME & DELINQUENCY, 2020, 66 (6-7) : 949 - 972
  • [48] Analysis of the Impact of Machine Translation Evaluation Metrics for Semantic Textual Similarity
    Magnolini, Simone
    Ngoc Phuoc An Vo
    Popescu, Octavian
    AI*IA 2016: ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2016, 10037 : 450 - 463
  • [49] Self-selection and evaluation of influenza vaccination effectiveness among elderly
    Yoo, Byung-Kwang
    Grosse, Scott
    Frick, Kevin D.
    VACCINE, 2006, 24 (40-41) : 6374 - 6375
  • [50] Self-Selection of Peers and Performance
    Kiessling, Lukas
    Radbruch, Jonas
    Schaube, Sebastian
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2022, 68 (11) : 8184 - 8201