Self-selection bias of similarity metrics in translation memory evaluation

被引:1
|
作者
Wolff, Friedel [1 ]
Pretorius, Laurette [1 ]
Dugast, Loic [1 ]
Buitelaar, Paul [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Africa, AALS, Coll Grad Studies, Pretoria, South Africa
[2] Natl Univ Ireland, INSIGHT Ctr Data Analyt, Galway, Ireland
基金
爱尔兰科学基金会;
关键词
Translation memory; Evaluation; Bias; Text similarity;
D O I
10.1007/s10590-016-9185-8
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
A translation memory system attempts to retrieve useful suggestions from previous translations to assist a translator in a new translation task. While assisting the translator with a specific segment, some similarity metric is usually employed to select the best matches from previously translated segments to present to a translator. Automated methods for evaluating a translation memory system usually use reference translations and some similarity metric. Such evaluation methods might be expected to assist in choosing between competing systems. No single evaluation method has gained widespread use; additionally the similarity metric used in each of these methods is not standardised either. This paper investigates the consequences of substituting the similarity metric in such an evaluation method, and finds that the similarity metrics exhibit a strong bias for the system using the same metric for retrieval. Consequently the choice of similarity metric in the evaluation of translation memory systems should be carefully reconsidered.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 144
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Self-selection bias in sleep and psychophysiological studies of Posttraumatic stress disorder
    Woodward, Steven H.
    Stegman, Wendy K.
    Pavao, Joanne R.
    Arsenault, Ned J.
    Hard, Tamara L.
    Drescher, Kent D.
    Weaver, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMATIC STRESS, 2007, 20 (04) : 619 - 623
  • [32] Self-selection bias, the food stamp program, and food insufficiency.
    Gundersen, C
    Oliveira, V
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 80 (05) : 1202 - 1202
  • [33] ASSESSING AND COMPENSATING FOR SELF-SELECTION BIAS (NONREPRESENTATIVENESS) OF THE FAMILY RESEARCH SAMPLE
    BRAVER, SL
    BAY, RC
    JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND THE FAMILY, 1992, 54 (04): : 925 - 939
  • [34] SELF-SELECTION READING
    MINGOIA, E
    EDUCATION, 1962, 83 (01): : 31 - 34
  • [35] Who are we missing? Self-selection bias in nonsuicidal self-injury research
    Robinson, Kealagh
    Dayer, Koosje F.
    Mirichlis, Sylvanna
    Hasking, Penelope A.
    Wilson, Marc S.
    SUICIDE AND LIFE-THREATENING BEHAVIOR, 2023, 53 (05) : 843 - 852
  • [36] SELF-SELECTION IN READING
    JENKINS, M
    READING TEACHER, 1957, 11 (02): : 84 - 90
  • [37] EDUCATION AND SELF-SELECTION
    WILLIS, RJ
    ROSEN, S
    JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1979, 87 (05) : S7 - S36
  • [38] NATIONAL SELF-SELECTION
    Schiller, F. C. S.
    EUGENICS REVIEW, 1910, 2 (01): : 8 - 24
  • [39] The effect of general health checks on healthcare utilization: accounting for self-selection bias
    Yoon, Sungwook
    Jun, Duk Bin
    Park, Sungho
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 2020, 183 (01) : 3 - 36
  • [40] Volunteerism and self-selection bias in human positron emission tomography neuroimaging research
    Lynn M. Oswald
    Gary S. Wand
    Shijun Zhu
    Victoria Selby
    Brain Imaging and Behavior, 2013, 7 : 163 - 176