Use of the Impella 2.5 for prophylactic circulatory support during elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention

被引:18
|
作者
Alasnag, Mirvat A. [1 ]
Gardi, Delair O. [1 ]
Elder, Mahir [1 ]
Kannam, Hari [1 ]
Ali, Farhan [1 ]
Petrina, Mircea [1 ]
Kheterpal, Vipin [1 ]
Hout, Mariah S. [2 ]
Schreiber, Theodore L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harper Univ Hosp, Detroit Med Ctr, Detroit, MI USA
[2] Abiomed Inc, Danvers, MA USA
关键词
Impella; 2.5; High-risk percutaneous coronary intervention; Percutaneous left ventricular assist device; Mechanical circulatory support;
D O I
10.1016/j.carrev.2011.02.002
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who are at high risk for cardiovascular collapse during the procedure may benefit from prophylactic circulatory support. The objective was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of prophylactic use of the Impella 2.5 during high-risk PCI. Methods and materials: We used the Impella 2.5 for partial circulatory support during 60 consecutive elective high-risk PCI cases over 20 months. All patients either were deemed inoperable by the cardiac surgeons or were offered bypass surgery but declined. Results: The patients had multiple risk factors including hypertension (95%), diabetes (52%), chronic pulmonary disease (23%), prior myocardial infarction (62%) and prior bypass surgery (18%). Forty-five percent presented with acute coronary syndrome. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 23%+/- 15%. Nearly all patients had multivessel disease (93%), and 60% had left main disease. The average SYNTAX score was 30 +/- 9. Despite lesion complexity and high-risk factors, we achieved an angiographic success rate of 96%. Left main lesions were treated in 55% of the patients, and 83% of patients had multiple lesions treated. There was one procedural death. At 30 days postintervention, mortality was 5%, and rates of myocardial infarction, stroke, target vessel revascularization and urgent bypass surgery were 0%. Conclusions: The single-center experience reported here demonstrates that use of the Impella 2.5 during high-risk PCI in the "real world"-outside the controlled environment of a clinical trial-is safe and feasible. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 303
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Use of the Impella 2.5 in High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    McCulloch, Brenda
    CRITICAL CARE NURSE, 2011, 31 (01) : E1 - E16
  • [2] Use of Impella Recover LP 2.5 in elective high risk percutaneous coronary intervention
    Luis Ferreiro, Jose
    Antoni Gomez-Hospital, Joan
    Cequier, Angel R.
    Angiolillo, Dominick J.
    Roura, Gerard
    Teruel, Luis
    Maristany, Jaume
    Gomez-Lara, Josep
    Jara, Francesc
    Bass, Theodore A.
    Esplugas, Enric
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 145 (02) : 235 - 237
  • [3] Mechanical Circulatory Support Prior to Elective High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Mawri, Sagger
    Dabbagh, Mohammed
    Basir, Babar Mir
    Voeltz, Michele
    Khandelwal, Akshay
    Koenig, Gerald
    Alqarqaz, Mohammad
    O'Neill, William
    Zaidan, Mohammad
    Alaswad, Khaldoon
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2019, 12 (04) : S15 - S15
  • [4] Real-world use of the Impella 2.5 circulatory support system in complex high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: The USpella Registry
    Maini, Brijeshwar
    Naidu, Srihari S.
    Mulukutla, Suresh
    Kleiman, Neal
    Schreiber, Theodore
    Wohns, David
    Dixon, Simon
    Rihal, Charanjit
    Dave, Rajesh
    O'Neill, William
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2012, 80 (05) : 717 - 725
  • [5] Percutaneous Impella Recover circulatory support in high-risk coronary angioplasty
    Arieti, Mario
    Pesarini, Gabriele
    Ribichini, Flavio
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2008, 9 (04) : 269 - 274
  • [6] Safety and feasibility of elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention procedures with left ventricular support of the Impella Recover LP 2.5
    Henriques, Jose P. S.
    Sjauw, Krischan D.
    Remmelink, Maurice
    Baon, Jan, Jr.
    van der Schaaf, Rene J.
    Vis, Marije M.
    Koch, Karel T.
    Tijssen, Jan G. P.
    Piek, Jan J.
    de Winter, Robbert J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 98 (8A): : 88M - 88M
  • [7] Safety and feasibility of elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention procedures with left ventricular support of the Impella Recover LP 2.5
    Henriques, JPS
    Remmelink, M
    Baan, J
    van der Schaaf, RJ
    Vis, MM
    Koch, KT
    Scholten, EW
    de Mol, BAJM
    Tijssen, JGP
    Piek, JJ
    de Winter, RJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 97 (07): : 990 - 992
  • [8] Safety and feasibility of elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention procedures with left ventricular support of the impella recover LP 2.5 device
    Sjauw, Krischan D.
    Remmelink, Maurice
    Vis, Marije M.
    van der Schaaf, Rene J.
    Koch, Karel T.
    Baan, Jan, Jr.
    Tijssen, Jan G.
    Piek, Jan J.
    de Winter, Robbert J.
    Henriques, Jose P.
    CIRCULATION, 2006, 114 (18) : 643 - 643
  • [9] Mechanical Circulatory Support for High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Moscardelli, Silvia
    Masoomi, Reza
    Villablanca, Pedro
    Jabri, Ahmad
    Patel, Ankitkumar K.
    Moroni, Francesco
    Azzalini, Lorenzo
    CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REPORTS, 2024, 26 (04) : 233 - 244
  • [10] Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Kar, Subrata
    CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REPORTS, 2018, 20 (01)