Use of the Impella 2.5 for prophylactic circulatory support during elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention

被引:18
|
作者
Alasnag, Mirvat A. [1 ]
Gardi, Delair O. [1 ]
Elder, Mahir [1 ]
Kannam, Hari [1 ]
Ali, Farhan [1 ]
Petrina, Mircea [1 ]
Kheterpal, Vipin [1 ]
Hout, Mariah S. [2 ]
Schreiber, Theodore L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harper Univ Hosp, Detroit Med Ctr, Detroit, MI USA
[2] Abiomed Inc, Danvers, MA USA
关键词
Impella; 2.5; High-risk percutaneous coronary intervention; Percutaneous left ventricular assist device; Mechanical circulatory support;
D O I
10.1016/j.carrev.2011.02.002
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who are at high risk for cardiovascular collapse during the procedure may benefit from prophylactic circulatory support. The objective was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of prophylactic use of the Impella 2.5 during high-risk PCI. Methods and materials: We used the Impella 2.5 for partial circulatory support during 60 consecutive elective high-risk PCI cases over 20 months. All patients either were deemed inoperable by the cardiac surgeons or were offered bypass surgery but declined. Results: The patients had multiple risk factors including hypertension (95%), diabetes (52%), chronic pulmonary disease (23%), prior myocardial infarction (62%) and prior bypass surgery (18%). Forty-five percent presented with acute coronary syndrome. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 23%+/- 15%. Nearly all patients had multivessel disease (93%), and 60% had left main disease. The average SYNTAX score was 30 +/- 9. Despite lesion complexity and high-risk factors, we achieved an angiographic success rate of 96%. Left main lesions were treated in 55% of the patients, and 83% of patients had multiple lesions treated. There was one procedural death. At 30 days postintervention, mortality was 5%, and rates of myocardial infarction, stroke, target vessel revascularization and urgent bypass surgery were 0%. Conclusions: The single-center experience reported here demonstrates that use of the Impella 2.5 during high-risk PCI in the "real world"-outside the controlled environment of a clinical trial-is safe and feasible. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 303
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hemodynamic Support Using the Impella 2.5 Catheter System during High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in a Patient with Severe Aortic Stenosis
    Harjai, Kishore J.
    O'Neill, William W.
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 23 (01) : 66 - 69
  • [22] An unexpected complication after impella use for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
    Roccasalva, Fausto
    Cannata, Francesco
    Chiarito, Mauro
    Pellegrino, Marta
    Pagnotta, Paolo
    Lancini, Damiano Regazzoli
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS, 2019, 21 (0J) : J105 - J105
  • [23] Avoiding Hemodynamic Collapse During High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Advanced Hemodynamics of Impella Support
    Verma, Sanjay
    Burkhoff, Daniel
    O'Neill, William W.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 89 (04) : 672 - 675
  • [24] Clinical Predictors of Impella Dependence During High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Sanborn, Luke
    Laifman, Eric
    Huang, Christie
    Tun, Han
    Matthews, Ray
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2023, 16 (04) : S25 - S25
  • [25] Mechanical circulatory support during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention in a young male patient
    Pawlik, Artur
    Kleczynski, Pawel
    Dudek, Dariusz
    Dziewierz, Artur
    Bartus, Stanislaw
    POSTEPY W KARDIOLOGII INTERWENCYJNEJ, 2020, 16 (03): : 347 - 348
  • [26] Impella 2.5 Support Protects Against Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Flaherty, Michael
    Pant, Sadip
    Kilgore, Tyler
    Dassanayaka, Sujith
    Loughran, John
    Rawasia, Wasiq
    Cheng, Allen
    Dawn, Buddhadeb
    Bartoli, Carlo
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 68 (18) : B49 - B50
  • [27] Use of mechanical circulatory support in high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions
    Al Jebaje, Zaid
    Jabri, Ahmad
    Mishra, Tushar
    Halboni, Adnan
    Ayyad, Asem
    Alameh, Anas
    Ellauzi, Rama
    Alexandrino, Francisco B.
    Alaswad, Khaldoon
    Basir, Mir Babar
    PROGRESS IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2025, 88 : 60 - 67
  • [28] DISTAL EMBOLIZATION DURING ELECTIVE HIGH-RISK PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION
    Chong, Adrian A.
    Cantor, Warren
    Sloninko, Joanna
    Freeman, Michael
    Leong-Poi, Howard
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 59 (13) : E80 - E80
  • [29] Routine Usage of Impella for High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    O'Neill, William W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2025, 239 : 18 - 19
  • [30] Mechanical circulatory support in high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: IIb or not IIb?
    Ayyoub, Alaa
    Levy, Michael S.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2020, 95 (03) : 513 - 514