Use of the Impella 2.5 for prophylactic circulatory support during elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention

被引:18
|
作者
Alasnag, Mirvat A. [1 ]
Gardi, Delair O. [1 ]
Elder, Mahir [1 ]
Kannam, Hari [1 ]
Ali, Farhan [1 ]
Petrina, Mircea [1 ]
Kheterpal, Vipin [1 ]
Hout, Mariah S. [2 ]
Schreiber, Theodore L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harper Univ Hosp, Detroit Med Ctr, Detroit, MI USA
[2] Abiomed Inc, Danvers, MA USA
关键词
Impella; 2.5; High-risk percutaneous coronary intervention; Percutaneous left ventricular assist device; Mechanical circulatory support;
D O I
10.1016/j.carrev.2011.02.002
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who are at high risk for cardiovascular collapse during the procedure may benefit from prophylactic circulatory support. The objective was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of prophylactic use of the Impella 2.5 during high-risk PCI. Methods and materials: We used the Impella 2.5 for partial circulatory support during 60 consecutive elective high-risk PCI cases over 20 months. All patients either were deemed inoperable by the cardiac surgeons or were offered bypass surgery but declined. Results: The patients had multiple risk factors including hypertension (95%), diabetes (52%), chronic pulmonary disease (23%), prior myocardial infarction (62%) and prior bypass surgery (18%). Forty-five percent presented with acute coronary syndrome. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 23%+/- 15%. Nearly all patients had multivessel disease (93%), and 60% had left main disease. The average SYNTAX score was 30 +/- 9. Despite lesion complexity and high-risk factors, we achieved an angiographic success rate of 96%. Left main lesions were treated in 55% of the patients, and 83% of patients had multiple lesions treated. There was one procedural death. At 30 days postintervention, mortality was 5%, and rates of myocardial infarction, stroke, target vessel revascularization and urgent bypass surgery were 0%. Conclusions: The single-center experience reported here demonstrates that use of the Impella 2.5 during high-risk PCI in the "real world"-outside the controlled environment of a clinical trial-is safe and feasible. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 303
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Role of Mechanical Circulatory Support in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Sengodan, Prasanna
    Siddiqui, Adeel
    Buch, Ashesh N.
    CURRENT CARDIOVASCULAR RISK REPORTS, 2020, 14 (11)
  • [42] Impella-Assisted Complex High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Lin, Yen-Po
    Lee, Wen-Lieng
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 83 (16) : S208 - S210
  • [43] Mechanical circulatory support with Impella in percutaneous coronary intervention: current status
    Chandrasekar, Baskaran
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL PLUS: CARDIOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2021, 1
  • [44] Percutaneous Circulatory Assist Devices for High-Risk Coronary Intervention
    Myat, Aung
    Patel, Niket
    Tehrani, Shana
    Banning, Adrian P.
    Redwood, Simon R.
    Bhatt, Deepak L.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2015, 8 (02) : 229 - 244
  • [45] Prophylactic use of intra-aortic balloon pump for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: will the Impella LP 2.5 device show superiority in a clinical randomized study?
    Syed, Asmir I.
    Karkar, Amit
    Torguson, Rebecca
    Li, Yanlin
    Ben-Dor, Itsik
    Collins, Sara D.
    Lemesle, Gilles
    Maluenda, Gabriel
    Xue, Zhenyi
    Scheinowitz, Mickey
    Kaneshige, Kimberly
    Satler, Lowell F.
    Kent, Kenneth M.
    Suddath, William O.
    Pichard, Augusto D.
    Lindsay, Joseph
    Waksman, Ron
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2010, 11 (02) : 91 - 97
  • [46] Prophylactic ECMO Support during Elective Coronary Percutaneous Interventions in High-Risk Patients: A Single-Center Experience
    Ungureanu, Claudiu
    Blaimont, Marc
    Trine, Hugues
    Henin, Pierre
    Courcelle, Romain
    Laurent, Yves
    Van Ruyssevelt, Patrick
    Lepiece, Caroline
    Huberlant, Vincent
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 2023
  • [47] Left Ventricular Rupture After Impella® Placement During High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    de Armas, Ismael A. Salas
    Kumar, Sachin
    Almustafa, Ahmed
    Akkanti, Bindu
    Akay, M. Hakan
    Patel, Manish K.
    Patel, Jayeshkumar
    Rajagopal, Keshava
    Marcano, Juan
    Goswami, Rajiv
    Gregoric, Igor D.
    Kar, Biswajit
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2020, 21 (11) : S100 - S102
  • [48] Feasibility and Efficacy of the 2.5 L and 3.8 L Impella Percutaneous Left Ventricular Support Device During High-Risk, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis
    Spiro, Jon
    Venugopal, Vinod
    Raja, Yogesh
    Ludman, Peter F.
    Townend, Jonathan N.
    Doshi, Sagar N.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2015, 85 (06) : 981 - 989
  • [49] Use of the CardioHELP Device for Temporary Hemodynamic Support During High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Awar, Lena
    Song, Abigail J.
    Dhillon, Ashwat S.
    Mehra, Anilkumar
    Burstein, Steven
    Shavelle, David M.
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 33 (08): : E614 - E618
  • [50] Impella support for cardiogenic shock and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: A single-center experience
    Brandao, Mariana
    Caeiro, Daniel
    Pires-Morais, Gustavo
    Almeida, Joao Goncalves
    Teixeira, Pedro Goncalves
    Silva, Marisa Passos
    Ponte, Marta
    Dias, Adelaide
    Oliveira, Marco
    Rodrigues, Alberto
    Braga, Pedro
    REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2021, 40 (11) : 853 - 861