Real-world use of the Impella 2.5 circulatory support system in complex high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: The USpella Registry

被引:105
|
作者
Maini, Brijeshwar [1 ]
Naidu, Srihari S. [2 ]
Mulukutla, Suresh [3 ]
Kleiman, Neal [4 ]
Schreiber, Theodore [5 ]
Wohns, David [6 ]
Dixon, Simon [7 ]
Rihal, Charanjit [8 ]
Dave, Rajesh [1 ]
O'Neill, William [9 ]
机构
[1] Pinnacle Hlth Syst, Harrisburg, PA USA
[2] Winthrop Univ Hosp, Mineola, NY 11501 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Methodist Debakey Heart & Vasc Ctr, Houston, TX USA
[5] Harper Univ Hosp, Detroit, MI USA
[6] Spectrum Hlth, Grand Rapids, MI USA
[7] William Beaumont Univ Hosp, Royal Oak, MI USA
[8] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN USA
[9] Univ Miami, Miami, FL USA
关键词
impella; 2; 5; high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention; percutaneous left ventricular assist device; circulatory support; INTRAAORTIC BALLOON PUMP; LONG-TERM SAFETY; MULTIVESSEL DISEASE; BYPASS-SURGERY; ASSIST DEVICE; REVASCULARIZATION; FEASIBILITY; ARTS;
D O I
10.1002/ccd.23403
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: We report on the real-world, multicenter experience of the Impella 2.5 circulatory support system during high-risk PCI, a subset of the larger USpella Registry. Background: Standard of care for most patients with compromised ventricular function with multivessel or high-risk coronary lesions has been coronary artery bypass grafting. In poor operative candidates, high-risk PCI is increasingly considered, despite an increased risk for periprocedural hemodynamic compromise. Methods: 175 consecutive patients who underwent high-risk PCI with prophylactic support of the Impella 2.5 were evaluated. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30 days. Secondary endpoints included safety and efficacy related to the device and patient outcomes, including survival at 12 months. Results: Overall angiographic revascularization was successful in 99% of patients and in 90% of those with multivessel revascularization, resulting in a reduction of the mean SYNTAX score post-PCI from 36 +/- 15 to 18 +/- 15 (P < 0.0001) and an improvement of the ejection fraction (from 31 +/- 15% to 36 +/- 14%, P < 0.0001). In 51% of patients, the functional status improved by one or more NYHA class (P < 0.001). At 30-day follow-up, the rate of MACE was 8%, and survival was 96%, 91%, and 88% at 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months, respectively. Conclusions: The use of Impella 2.5 in high-risk PCI appeared feasible and safe in the real-world setting. The utilization of the Impella 2.5 was successful, resulting in favorable short- and midterm angiographic, procedural and clinical outcomes. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:717 / 725
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Use of the Impella 2.5 for prophylactic circulatory support during elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
    Alasnag, Mirvat A.
    Gardi, Delair O.
    Elder, Mahir
    Kannam, Hari
    Ali, Farhan
    Petrina, Mircea
    Kheterpal, Vipin
    Hout, Mariah S.
    Schreiber, Theodore L.
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2011, 12 (05) : 299 - 303
  • [2] Use of the Impella 2.5 in High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    McCulloch, Brenda
    CRITICAL CARE NURSE, 2011, 31 (01) : E1 - E16
  • [3] Real-world supported unprotected left main percutaneous coronary intervention with impella device; data from the USpella registry
    Schreiber, Theodore
    Htun, Wah Wah
    Blank, Nimrod
    Telila, Tesfaye
    Mercado, Nestor
    Briasoulis, Alexandros
    Kaki, Amir
    Kondur, Ashok
    Munir, Ahmad
    Grines, Cindy
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 90 (04) : 576 - 581
  • [4] Supported High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With the Impella 2.5 Device The Europella Registry
    Sjauw, Krischan D.
    Konorza, Thomas
    Erbel, Raimund
    Danna, Paolo L.
    Viecca, Maurizio
    Minden, Hans-Heinrich
    Butter, Christian
    Engstrom, Thomas
    Hassager, Christian
    Machado, Francisco P.
    Pedrazzini, Giovanni
    Wagner, Daniel R.
    Schamberger, Rainer
    Kerber, Sebastian
    Mathey, Detlef G.
    Schofer, Joachim
    Engstrom, Annemarie E.
    Henriques, Jose P. S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (25) : 2430 - 2434
  • [5] Mechanical circulatory support for complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
    Ferro, Enrico G.
    Kim, Joseph M.
    Lalani, Christina
    Abbott, Dawn J.
    Yeh, Robert W.
    EUROINTERVENTION, 2025, 21 (03) : e149 - e160
  • [6] Secular Trend in the Use and Implementation of Impella in High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Cardiogenic Shock: A Real-World Experience
    Hritani, Abdul Wahab
    Wani, Adil S.
    Olet, Susan
    Lauterbach, Claire J.
    Allaqaband, Suhail Q.
    Bajwa, Tanvir
    Jan, M. Fuad
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 31 (09): : E265 - E270
  • [7] Percutaneous Impella Recover circulatory support in high-risk coronary angioplasty
    Arieti, Mario
    Pesarini, Gabriele
    Ribichini, Flavio
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2008, 9 (04) : 269 - 274
  • [8] Mechanical Circulatory Support for High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Moscardelli, Silvia
    Masoomi, Reza
    Villablanca, Pedro
    Jabri, Ahmad
    Patel, Ankitkumar K.
    Moroni, Francesco
    Azzalini, Lorenzo
    CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REPORTS, 2024, 26 (04) : 233 - 244
  • [9] Impella-Assisted Complex High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Lin, Yen-Po
    Lee, Wen-Lieng
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 83 (16) : S208 - S210
  • [10] Impending savior: Impella 2.5 circulatory support system in high-risk PCI
    Kherada, Nisharahmed
    Mehran, Roxana
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2012, 80 (05) : 726 - 727