What If the 'Anthropocene' Is Not Formalized as a New Geological Series/Epoch?

被引:9
|
作者
Rull, Valenti [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIC, ICTJA, Inst Earth Sci Jaume Almera, C Sole & Sabaris S-N, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain
来源
QUATERNARY | 2018年 / 1卷 / 03期
关键词
Anthropocene; human impact; chronostratigraphy; geochronology; International Chronostratigraphic Chart; Geological Time Scale; chronostratigraphic units; series; epoch; formalization;
D O I
10.3390/quat1030024
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
In the coming years, the Anthropocene Working Group (AWG) will submit its proposal on the 'Anthropocene' to the Subcommission of Quaternary Stratigraphy (SQS) and the International Commission on Stratigraphy (ICS) for approval. If approved, the proposal will be sent to the Executive Committee of the International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS) for ratification. If the proposal is approved and ratified, then the 'Anthropocene' will be formalized. Currently, the 'Anthropocene' is a broadly used term and concept in a wide range of scientific and non-scientific situations, and, for many, the official acceptance of this term is only a matter of time. However, the AWG proposal, in its present state, seems to not fully meet the requirements for a new chronostratigraphic unit. This essay asks what could happen if the current 'Anthropocene' proposal is not formalized by the ICS/IUGS. The possible stratigraphic alternatives are evaluated on the basis of the more recent literature and the personal opinions of distinguished AWG, SQS, and ICS members. The eventual impact on environmental sciences and on non-scientific sectors, where the 'Anthropocene' seems already firmly rooted and de facto accepted as a new geological epoch, are also discussed. This essay is intended as the editorial introduction to a Quaternary special issue on the topic.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Are we in the Anthropocene? Geologists could define new epoch for Earth
    McKenzie Prillaman
    Nature, 2023, 613 : 14 - 15
  • [42] Structural biology in the Anthropocene epoch
    Mabbitt, Peter D.
    NATURE STRUCTURAL & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2024, 31 (01) : 2 - 2
  • [43] Structural biology in the Anthropocene epoch
    Peter D. Mabbitt
    Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 2024, 31 : 2 - 2
  • [44] New opportunities emerge as the Anthropocene epoch vote falls short
    Nicole Boivin
    Todd Braje
    Torben Rick
    Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2024, 8 : 844 - 845
  • [45] The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis: Rethinking Modernity in a New Epoch
    Soeiro, Diana
    ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES, 2016, 25 (05) : 630 - 632
  • [46] The Great Acceleration is real and provides a quantitative basis for the proposed Anthropocene Series/Epoch
    Head, Martin J.
    Steffen, Will
    Fagerlind, David
    Waters, Colin N.
    Poirier, Clement
    Syvitski, Jaia
    Zalasiewicz, Jan A.
    Barnosky, Anthony D.
    Cearreta, Alejandro
    Jeandel, Catherine
    Leinfelder, Reinhold
    McNeill, J. R.
    Rose, Neil L.
    Summerhayes, Colin
    Wagreich, Michael
    Zinke, Jens
    EPISODES, 2022, 45 (04): : 359 - 376
  • [47] The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis: Rethinking modernity in a new epoch
    Cojanu, Valentin
    JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 9 (01): : 146 - 149
  • [48] Defining the Anthropocene as a geological epoch captures human impacts' triphasic nature to empower science and action
    Svenning, Jens-Christian
    Kerr, Matthew R.
    Mungi, Ninad A.
    Ordonez, Alejandro
    Riede, Felix
    ONE EARTH, 2024, 7 (10): : 1678 - 1681
  • [49] Challenges for health in the Anthropocene epoch
    Haines, Andy
    Scheelbeek, Pauline
    Abbasi, Kamran
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 364
  • [50] The "ANTHROPOCENE": What is its geological utility? (Answer: It has none!)
    Klein, George Devries
    EPISODES, 2015, 38 (03): : 218 - 218