What If the 'Anthropocene' Is Not Formalized as a New Geological Series/Epoch?

被引:9
|
作者
Rull, Valenti [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIC, ICTJA, Inst Earth Sci Jaume Almera, C Sole & Sabaris S-N, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain
来源
QUATERNARY | 2018年 / 1卷 / 03期
关键词
Anthropocene; human impact; chronostratigraphy; geochronology; International Chronostratigraphic Chart; Geological Time Scale; chronostratigraphic units; series; epoch; formalization;
D O I
10.3390/quat1030024
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
In the coming years, the Anthropocene Working Group (AWG) will submit its proposal on the 'Anthropocene' to the Subcommission of Quaternary Stratigraphy (SQS) and the International Commission on Stratigraphy (ICS) for approval. If approved, the proposal will be sent to the Executive Committee of the International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS) for ratification. If the proposal is approved and ratified, then the 'Anthropocene' will be formalized. Currently, the 'Anthropocene' is a broadly used term and concept in a wide range of scientific and non-scientific situations, and, for many, the official acceptance of this term is only a matter of time. However, the AWG proposal, in its present state, seems to not fully meet the requirements for a new chronostratigraphic unit. This essay asks what could happen if the current 'Anthropocene' proposal is not formalized by the ICS/IUGS. The possible stratigraphic alternatives are evaluated on the basis of the more recent literature and the personal opinions of distinguished AWG, SQS, and ICS members. The eventual impact on environmental sciences and on non-scientific sectors, where the 'Anthropocene' seems already firmly rooted and de facto accepted as a new geological epoch, are also discussed. This essay is intended as the editorial introduction to a Quaternary special issue on the topic.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] On the starting point for a new geological epoch
    Zalasiewicz, Jan
    Head, Martin
    Turner, Simon
    Waters, Colin
    Williams, Mark
    Smith, Dave
    NEW SCIENTIST, 2023, 246 (3457) : 24 - 24
  • [22] Anthropocene: The Human Epoch
    Pritchard, Sara B.
    Baichwal, Jennifer
    de Pencier, Nicholas
    Burtynsky, Edward
    ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY, 2020, 25 (02) : 377 - 382
  • [23] The Anthropocene as an Event, not an Epoch
    Gibbard, Philip
    Walker, Michael
    Bauer, Andrew
    Edgeworth, Matthew
    Edwards, Lucy
    Ellis, Erle
    Finney, Stanley
    Gill, Jacquelyn L.
    Maslin, Mark
    Merritts, Dorothy
    Ruddiman, William
    JOURNAL OF QUATERNARY SCIENCE, 2022, 37 (03) : 395 - 399
  • [24] On the mineralogy of the "Anthropocene Epoch"
    Hazen, Robert M.
    Grew, Edward S.
    Origlieri, Marcus J.
    Downs, Robert T.
    AMERICAN MINERALOGIST, 2017, 102 (03) : 595 - 611
  • [25] Anthropocene: event or epoch?
    Bauer, Andrew M.
    NATURE, 2021, 597 (7876) : 332 - 332
  • [26] After the Anthropocene: Politics and geographic inquiry for a new epoch
    Johnson, Elizabeth
    Morehouse, Harlan
    PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2014, 38 (03) : 439 - 456
  • [27] Anthropocene: event or epoch?
    Andrew M. Bauer
    Matthew Edgeworth
    Lucy E. Edwards
    Erle C. Ellis
    Philip Gibbard
    Dorothy J. Merritts
    Nature, 2021, 597 : 332 - 332
  • [28] Law in the Anthropocene Epoch
    Biber, Eric
    GEORGETOWN LAW JOURNAL, 2017, 106 (01) : 1 - 68
  • [29] THE BODY FROM A SUBJECTIVITY OF PROGRESS IN THE NEW ANTHROPOCENE EPOCH
    Iglesias Garcia, Ricardo
    ARTE Y POLITICAS DE IDENTIDAD, 2019, 20 : 97 - 114
  • [30] On the dangers of an Anthropocene epoch: Geological time, political time and post-human politics
    Fagan, Madeleine
    POLITICAL GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 70 : 55 - 63