What If the 'Anthropocene' Is Not Formalized as a New Geological Series/Epoch?

被引:9
|
作者
Rull, Valenti [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIC, ICTJA, Inst Earth Sci Jaume Almera, C Sole & Sabaris S-N, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain
来源
QUATERNARY | 2018年 / 1卷 / 03期
关键词
Anthropocene; human impact; chronostratigraphy; geochronology; International Chronostratigraphic Chart; Geological Time Scale; chronostratigraphic units; series; epoch; formalization;
D O I
10.3390/quat1030024
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
In the coming years, the Anthropocene Working Group (AWG) will submit its proposal on the 'Anthropocene' to the Subcommission of Quaternary Stratigraphy (SQS) and the International Commission on Stratigraphy (ICS) for approval. If approved, the proposal will be sent to the Executive Committee of the International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS) for ratification. If the proposal is approved and ratified, then the 'Anthropocene' will be formalized. Currently, the 'Anthropocene' is a broadly used term and concept in a wide range of scientific and non-scientific situations, and, for many, the official acceptance of this term is only a matter of time. However, the AWG proposal, in its present state, seems to not fully meet the requirements for a new chronostratigraphic unit. This essay asks what could happen if the current 'Anthropocene' proposal is not formalized by the ICS/IUGS. The possible stratigraphic alternatives are evaluated on the basis of the more recent literature and the personal opinions of distinguished AWG, SQS, and ICS members. The eventual impact on environmental sciences and on non-scientific sectors, where the 'Anthropocene' seems already firmly rooted and de facto accepted as a new geological epoch, are also discussed. This essay is intended as the editorial introduction to a Quaternary special issue on the topic.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Geological Heritage of the Anthropocene Epoch-A Conceptual Viewpoint
    Ruban, Dmitry A.
    HERITAGE, 2020, 3 (01): : 19 - 28
  • [12] The 'Anthropocene' is here to stay - and it's better not as a geological epoch
    Roland, Thomas P.
    Swindles, Graeme T.
    Ruffell, Alastair
    NATURE, 2024, 627 (8005) : 735 - 735
  • [13] A practical solution: the Anthropocene is a geological event, not a formal epoch
    Gibbard, Philip L.
    Bauer, Andrew M.
    Edgeworth, Matthew
    Ruddiman, William F.
    Gill, Jacquelyn L.
    Merritts, Dorothy J.
    Finney, Stanley C.
    Edwards, Lucy E.
    Walker, Michael J. C.
    Maslin, Mark
    Ellis, Erle C.
    EPISODES, 2022, 45 (04): : 349 - 357
  • [14] Defining the onset of the Anthropocene Twelve sites are considered for defining the Anthropocene geological epoch
    Waters, Colin N.
    Turner, Simon D.
    SCIENCE, 2022, 378 (6621) : 706 - 708
  • [15] Anthropocene, What Anthropocene? The City and the Epoch in A Fine Balance and The Dog
    Estok, Simon C.
    CONCENTRIC-LITERARY AND CULTURAL STUDIES, 2017, 43 (01): : 33 - 50
  • [16] Evaluating the Anthropocene: is there something useful about a geological epoch of humans?
    Braje, Todd J.
    ANTIQUITY, 2016, 90 (350) : 504 - 512
  • [17] The Humanities are invited to the Anthropocene Event but not to the Anthropocene Series/Epoch: a response to Chvostek (2023)
    Finney, Stanley C. C.
    Gibbard, Philip L. L.
    JOURNAL OF QUATERNARY SCIENCE, 2023, 38 (04) : 461 - 462
  • [18] THE ANTHROPOCENE EPOCH e WHAT IT MEANS FOR THE WORLD OF PHARMACY
    Traulsen, Janine
    Norgaard, Lotte Stig
    Rossing, Charlotte Verner
    RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2024, 20 (02): : 229 - 229
  • [19] Why the Anthropocene is unsuitable as a new geochronological epoch
    Hoffmann, Goesta
    ZEITSCHRIFT DER DEUTSCHEN GESELLSCHAFT FUR GEOWISSENSCHAFTEN, 2017, 168 (01): : 3 - 7
  • [20] Is this the Anthropocene or the Plasticene epoch?
    Cox, Guy
    NEW SCIENTIST, 2018, 240 (3198) : 53 - 53