From GUM to alternative methods for measurement uncertainty evaluation

被引:0
|
作者
Marc Priel
机构
[1] Laboratoire National de Métrologie et d’Essais,
来源
关键词
Measurement uncertainty; Proficiency testing; Internal quality control; External Quality Assessment Scheme (EQAS); Uncertainty in biological analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Since the advent of the Guide to the expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) in 1995 laying the principles of uncertainty evaluation numerous projects have been carried out to develop alternative practical methods that are easier to implement namely when it is impossible to model the measurement process for technical or economical aspects. In this paper, the author presents the recent evolution of measurement uncertainty evaluation methods. The evaluation of measurement uncertainty can be presented according to two axes based on intralaboratory and interlaboratory approaches. The intralaboratory approach includes “the modelling approach” (application of the procedure described in section 8 of the GUM, known as GUM uncertainty framework) and “the single laboratory validation approach”. The interlaboratory approaches are based on collaborative studies and they are respectively named “interlaboratory validation approach” and “proficiency testing approach”.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 241
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Measurement uncertainty evaluation for a non-negative measurand: an alternative to limit of detection
    Williams, Alex
    ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2008, 13 (01) : 29 - 32
  • [43] Erratum to: Uncertainty factor: an alternative way to express measurement uncertainty in chemical measurement
    Michael H. Ramsey
    Stephen L. R. Ellison
    Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 2015, 20 : 157 - 157
  • [44] Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty on Measurement Chain
    Zu Xianfeng
    Han Yuqin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TEST AUTOMATION & INSTRUMENTATION, VOL. 3, 2008, : 1333 - 1336
  • [45] Evaluation of measurement uncertainty of dissolution tests by the ISO-GUM approach and Monte-Carlo simulation
    Haidara, Hasnaa
    Saffaj, Taoufiq
    Bentama, Abdeslam
    EL HajjI, Ridouane
    Ihssane, Bouchaib
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY, 2021, 64 (09): : 4955 - 4971
  • [46] Methods for Optical Shape Measurement and their Measurement Uncertainty
    Pavlicek, Pavel
    Haeusler, Gerd
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPTOMECHATRONICS, 2014, 8 (04) : 292 - 303
  • [47] EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF INCOME MEASUREMENT VIA A CRITERION OF MANAGERIAL ABILITY
    PICUR, RD
    MCKEOWN, JC
    QUARTERLY REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 1979, 19 (01): : 75 - 98
  • [48] A software package comparison for uncertainty measurement estimation according to GUM
    Jurado, J. M.
    Alcazar, A.
    ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2005, 10 (07) : 373 - 381
  • [49] A software package comparison for uncertainty measurement estimation according to GUM
    J. M. Jurado
    A. Alcázar
    Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 2005, 10 : 373 - 381
  • [50] Quantifying the measurement uncertainty of results from environmental analytical methods
    Moser, J
    Wegscheider, W
    Sperka-Gottlieb, C
    FRESENIUS JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2001, 370 (06): : 679 - 689