From GUM to alternative methods for measurement uncertainty evaluation

被引:0
|
作者
Marc Priel
机构
[1] Laboratoire National de Métrologie et d’Essais,
来源
关键词
Measurement uncertainty; Proficiency testing; Internal quality control; External Quality Assessment Scheme (EQAS); Uncertainty in biological analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Since the advent of the Guide to the expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) in 1995 laying the principles of uncertainty evaluation numerous projects have been carried out to develop alternative practical methods that are easier to implement namely when it is impossible to model the measurement process for technical or economical aspects. In this paper, the author presents the recent evolution of measurement uncertainty evaluation methods. The evaluation of measurement uncertainty can be presented according to two axes based on intralaboratory and interlaboratory approaches. The intralaboratory approach includes “the modelling approach” (application of the procedure described in section 8 of the GUM, known as GUM uncertainty framework) and “the single laboratory validation approach”. The interlaboratory approaches are based on collaborative studies and they are respectively named “interlaboratory validation approach” and “proficiency testing approach”.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 241
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An uncertainty evaluation for multiple measurements by GUM
    J. Choi
    Euijin Hwang
    H.-Y. So
    Byungjoo Kim
    Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 2003, 8 : 13 - 15
  • [22] Practical determination of the measurement uncertainty under GUM
    Sommer, KD
    Siebert, BRL
    TECHNISCHES MESSEN, 2004, 71 (02): : 52 - 66
  • [23] An uncertainty evaluation for multiple measurements by GUM
    Choi, J
    Hwang, E
    So, HY
    Kim, B
    ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2003, 8 (01) : 13 - 15
  • [24] GUM method for evaluation of measurement uncertainty: BPL long wave time service monitoring
    Chen, Yingming
    Li, Xiaohui
    Huang, Luxi
    Wang, Xin
    Liu, Changhong
    Zhao, Fan
    Hua, Yu
    Feng, Ping
    MEASUREMENT, 2022, 189
  • [25] Brief Overview of Methods for Measurement Uncertainty Analysis: GUM Uncertainty Framework, Monte Carlo Method, Characteristic Function Approach
    Witkovsky, V.
    Wimmer, G.
    Durisova, Z.
    Duris, S.
    Palencar, R.
    2017 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MEASUREMENT, 2017, : 35 - 38
  • [26] Research on measurement uncertainty evaluation methods based on Bayesian principle
    Chen, X.H.
    Cheng, Z.Y.
    Fei, Y.T.
    Key Engineering Materials, 2008, 381-382 : 583 - 586
  • [27] Comparison of the linear and non linear methods for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty
    Martins M.A.F.
    Kalid R.A.
    Nery G.A.
    Teixeira L.A.
    Gonçalves G.A.A.
    Controle y Automacao, 2010, 21 (06): : 557 - 576
  • [28] Uncertainty factor: an alternative way to express measurement uncertainty in chemical measurement
    Ramsey, Michael H.
    Ellison, Stephen L. R.
    ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2015, 20 (02) : 153 - 155
  • [29] Evaluation of measurement uncertainty from a nonstationary process
    Zhang, Nien Fan
    MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 30 (06)
  • [30] Evaluation of measurement uncertainty from imperfect data
    Zhang Xiao-Zhang
    Ge Aidong
    Ma Jianwei
    Bai Yujie
    FRONTIERS OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING II, PTS 1 AND 2, 2014, 457-458 : 815 - 820