From GUM to alternative methods for measurement uncertainty evaluation

被引:0
|
作者
Marc Priel
机构
[1] Laboratoire National de Métrologie et d’Essais,
来源
关键词
Measurement uncertainty; Proficiency testing; Internal quality control; External Quality Assessment Scheme (EQAS); Uncertainty in biological analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Since the advent of the Guide to the expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) in 1995 laying the principles of uncertainty evaluation numerous projects have been carried out to develop alternative practical methods that are easier to implement namely when it is impossible to model the measurement process for technical or economical aspects. In this paper, the author presents the recent evolution of measurement uncertainty evaluation methods. The evaluation of measurement uncertainty can be presented according to two axes based on intralaboratory and interlaboratory approaches. The intralaboratory approach includes “the modelling approach” (application of the procedure described in section 8 of the GUM, known as GUM uncertainty framework) and “the single laboratory validation approach”. The interlaboratory approaches are based on collaborative studies and they are respectively named “interlaboratory validation approach” and “proficiency testing approach”.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 241
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] UNCERTAINTY EVALUATION OF DYNAMIC MEASUREMENTS IN LINE WITH THE GUM
    Elster, Clemens
    Eichstaedt, Sascha
    Link, Alfred
    XIX IMEKO WORLD CONGRESS: FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED METROLOGY, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 2311 - 2314
  • [32] Measurement uncertainty according to ISO/BIPM-GUM
    Kessel, W
    THERMOCHIMICA ACTA, 2002, 382 (1-2) : 1 - 16
  • [33] An uncertainty evaluation for multiple measurements by GUM, II
    Choi, JO
    Kim, D
    Hwang, EJ
    So, HY
    ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2003, 8 (05) : 205 - 207
  • [34] Terminological aspects of the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM)
    Ehrlich, Charles
    METROLOGIA, 2014, 51 (04) : S145 - S154
  • [35] An uncertainty evaluation for multiple measurements by GUM, II
    JongOh Choi
    Dal-ho Kim
    Euijin Hwang
    Hun-Young So
    Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 2003, 8 : 205 - 207
  • [36] Examples of measurement uncertainty evaluations in accordance with the revised GUM
    Runje, B.
    Horvatic, A.
    Alar, V.
    Medic, S.
    Bosnjakovic, A.
    2016 JOINT IMEKO TC1-TC7-TC13 SYMPOSIUM: METROLOGY ACROSS THE SCIENCES: WISHFUL THINKING?, 2016, 772
  • [37] Using the ISO guide to expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM)
    Gogolak, Carl
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2005, 230 : U2293 - U2293
  • [38] Uncertainty evaluation for wind speed measurement part (1): "GUM method and Monte Carlo method"
    Wei, Mingming
    Chong, Wei
    Cao, Jie
    Zhou, Taocheng
    Zheng, Debin
    FLOW MEASUREMENT AND INSTRUMENTATION, 2024, 97
  • [39] Comparison of GUM and Monte Carlo Methods for Measurement Uncertainty Estimation of the Energy Performance Measurements of Gas Stoves
    Utomo, Bayu
    Kusnandar, Nanang
    Firdaus, Himma
    Paramudita, Intan
    Kasiyanto, Iput
    Lailiyah, Qudsiyyatul
    Syam, Wahyudin P.
    MEASUREMENT SCIENCE REVIEW, 2022, 22 (04) : 160 - 169
  • [40] Comparing methods for evaluating measurement uncertainty given in the JCGM 'Evaluation of Measurement Data' documents
    Stant, L. T.
    Aaen, P. H.
    Ridler, N. M.
    MEASUREMENT, 2016, 94 : 847 - 851