Safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS): a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Angela Yun Kim
Anna Marduy
Paulo S. de Melo
Anna Carolyna Gianlorenco
Chi Kyung Kim
Hyuk Choi
Jae-Jun Song
Felipe Fregni
机构
[1] Korea University Medical Center,Department of Otorhinolaryngology
[2] Uniao Metropolitana de Ensino e Cultura (UNIME) Salvador,Head and Neck Surgery
[3] Harvard Medical School,Neuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital
[4] Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saude Publica,Department of Medicine
[5] Federal University of Sao Carlos,Department of Physical Therapy
[6] Korea University Guro Hospital,Department of Neurology
[7] Korea University,Department of Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine
[8] Neurive Co.,undefined
[9] Ltd.,undefined
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) has been investigated as a novel neuromodulation tool. Although taVNS is generally considered safe with only mild and transient adverse effects (AEs), those specifically caused by taVNS have not yet been investigated. This systematic review and meta-analysis on taVNS aimed to (1) systematically analyze study characteristics and AE assessment, (2) characterize and analyze possible AEs and their incidence, (3) search for predictable risk factors, (4) analyze the severity of AE, and (5) suggest an evidence-based taVNS adverse events questionnaire for safety monitoring. The articles searched were published through April 7, 2022, in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Lilacs databases. In general, we evaluated 177 studies that assessed 6322 subjects. From these, 55.37% of studies did not mention the presence or absence of any AEs; only 24.86% of the studies described that at least one adverse event occurred. In the 35 studies reporting the number of subjects with at least one adverse event, a meta-analytic approach to calculate the risk differences of developing an adverse event between active taVNS and controls was used. The meta-analytic overall adverse events incidence rate was calculated for the total number of adverse events reported on a 100,000 person-minutes-days scale. There were no differences in risk of developing an adverse event between active taVNS and controls. The incidence of AE, in general, was 12.84/100,000 person-minutes-days of stimulation, and the most frequently reported were ear pain, headache, and tingling. Almost half of the studies did not report the presence or absence of any AEs. We attribute this to the absence of AE in those studies. There was no causal relationship between taVNS and severe adverse events. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis of transcutaneous auricular stimulation safety. Overall, taVNS is a safe and feasible option for clinical intervention.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] TRANSCUTANEOUS AURICULAR VAGUS NERVE STIMULATION (TAVNS) MODULATES BEHAVIOUR AND PUPIL DILATION IN A PATCH-LEAVING TASK
    Marzecova, Anna
    Skora, Lina
    Vernaillen, Brent
    Andronova, Evelina
    Jocham, Gerhard
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 61 : S215 - S215
  • [42] Current challenges in reliably targeting the noradrenergic locus coeruleus using transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS)
    Ludwig, Mareike
    Wienke, Christian
    Betts, Matthew J.
    Zaehle, Tino
    Haemmerer, Dorothea
    AUTONOMIC NEUROSCIENCE-BASIC & CLINICAL, 2021, 236
  • [43] Tonic and phasic transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) both evoke rapid and transient pupil dilation
    Skora, Lina
    Marzecova, Anna
    Jocham, Gerhard
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2024, 17 (01) : 233 - 244
  • [44] No modulation of pupil size and event-related pupil response by transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS)
    Keute, Marius
    Demirezen, Mustafa
    Graf, Alina
    Mueller, Notger G.
    Zaehle, Tino
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [45] Effectiveness and safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation for depression in patients with epilepsy
    Xu, Zheng Yan Ran
    Fang, Jia Jia
    Fan, Xiao Qin
    Xu, Long Long
    Jin, Gui Fang
    Lei, Mei Hua
    Wang, Yu Fei
    Liu, Jun Biao
    Dong, Fang
    Jiang, Lu Rong
    Guo, Yi
    EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2025, 163
  • [46] Synergistic effects of simultaneous transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) on the brain responses
    Sun, Jin-Bo
    Tian, Qian-Qian
    Yang, Xue-Juan
    Deng, Hui
    Li, Nan
    Meng, Ling -Xia
    Zhao, Zi-Xuan
    Zhu, Yuan-Qiang
    Xi, Yi-Bin
    Yang, Qun
    Qin, Wei
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2021, 14 (02) : 417 - 419
  • [47] Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review of Clinical Treatment Protocols and Stimulation Parameters
    Sigrist, Christine
    Torki, Bushra
    Bolz, Lars -Oliver
    Jeglorz, Tobias
    Bolz, Armin
    Koenig, Julian
    NEUROMODULATION, 2023, 26 (03): : 507 - 517
  • [48] The anatomical basis for transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation
    Butt, Mohsin F.
    Albusoda, Ahmed
    Farmer, Adam D.
    Aziz, Qasim
    JOURNAL OF ANATOMY, 2020, 236 (04) : 588 - 611
  • [49] Age as an Effect Modifier of the Effects of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS) on Heart Rate Variability in Healthy Subjects
    Gianlorenco, Anna Carolyna
    Pacheco-Barrios, Kevin
    Daibes, Marianna
    Camargo, Lucas
    Choi, Hyuk
    Song, Jae-Jun
    Fregni, Felipe
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (14)
  • [50] Toward Diverse or Standardized: A Systematic Review Identifying Transcutaneous Stimulation of Auricular Branch of the Vagus Nerve in Nomenclature
    Wang, Yu
    Li, Liang
    Li, Shaoyuan
    Fang, Jiliang
    Zhang, Jinling
    Wang, Junying
    Zhang, Zixuan
    Wang, Yifei
    He, Jiakai
    Zhang, Yue
    Rong, Peijing
    NEUROMODULATION, 2022, 25 (03): : 366 - 379