Safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS): a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Angela Yun Kim
Anna Marduy
Paulo S. de Melo
Anna Carolyna Gianlorenco
Chi Kyung Kim
Hyuk Choi
Jae-Jun Song
Felipe Fregni
机构
[1] Korea University Medical Center,Department of Otorhinolaryngology
[2] Uniao Metropolitana de Ensino e Cultura (UNIME) Salvador,Head and Neck Surgery
[3] Harvard Medical School,Neuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital
[4] Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saude Publica,Department of Medicine
[5] Federal University of Sao Carlos,Department of Physical Therapy
[6] Korea University Guro Hospital,Department of Neurology
[7] Korea University,Department of Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine
[8] Neurive Co.,undefined
[9] Ltd.,undefined
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) has been investigated as a novel neuromodulation tool. Although taVNS is generally considered safe with only mild and transient adverse effects (AEs), those specifically caused by taVNS have not yet been investigated. This systematic review and meta-analysis on taVNS aimed to (1) systematically analyze study characteristics and AE assessment, (2) characterize and analyze possible AEs and their incidence, (3) search for predictable risk factors, (4) analyze the severity of AE, and (5) suggest an evidence-based taVNS adverse events questionnaire for safety monitoring. The articles searched were published through April 7, 2022, in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Lilacs databases. In general, we evaluated 177 studies that assessed 6322 subjects. From these, 55.37% of studies did not mention the presence or absence of any AEs; only 24.86% of the studies described that at least one adverse event occurred. In the 35 studies reporting the number of subjects with at least one adverse event, a meta-analytic approach to calculate the risk differences of developing an adverse event between active taVNS and controls was used. The meta-analytic overall adverse events incidence rate was calculated for the total number of adverse events reported on a 100,000 person-minutes-days scale. There were no differences in risk of developing an adverse event between active taVNS and controls. The incidence of AE, in general, was 12.84/100,000 person-minutes-days of stimulation, and the most frequently reported were ear pain, headache, and tingling. Almost half of the studies did not report the presence or absence of any AEs. We attribute this to the absence of AE in those studies. There was no causal relationship between taVNS and severe adverse events. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis of transcutaneous auricular stimulation safety. Overall, taVNS is a safe and feasible option for clinical intervention.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Enhancing Motor Sequence Learning via Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS): An EEG Study
    Chen, Long
    Tang, Chenghu
    Wang, Zhongpeng
    Zhang, Lei
    Gu, Bin
    Liu, Xiuyun
    Ming, Dong
    IEEE JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, 2024, 28 (03) : 1285 - 1296
  • [32] Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy
    Zhang, Qing
    Luo, Xue
    Wang, Xiao-hui
    Li, Jing-ya
    Qiu, Hui
    Yang, Dong-dong
    SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY, 2024, 119 : 84 - 91
  • [33] TRANSCUTANEOUS AURICULAR VAGUS NERVE STIMULATION IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS - A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF TREATMENT PROTOCOLS AND STIMULATION PARAMETERS
    Sigrist, Christine
    Torki, Bouchra
    Bolz, Armin
    Bolz, Lars O.
    Jeglorz, Tobias
    Bender, Stephan
    Koenig, Julian
    PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 2022, 84 (05): : A35 - A35
  • [34] Understanding the Neuroplastic Effects of Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Animal Models of Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    de Melo, Paulo S.
    Parente, Joao
    Rebello-Sanchez, Ingrid
    Marduy, Anna
    Gianlorenco, Anna Carolyna
    Kim, Chi Kyung
    Choi, Hyuk
    Song, Jae-Jun
    Fregni, Felipe
    NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2023, 37 (08) : 564 - 576
  • [35] Clinical Efficacy of Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation in the Treatment of Chronic and Acute Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Duff, Irina T.
    Likar, Rudolf
    Perruchoud, Christophe
    Kampusch, Stefan
    Koestenberger, Markus
    Sator, Sabine
    Stremnitzer, Caroline
    Wolf, Andreas
    Neuwersch-Sommeregger, Stefan
    Abd-Elsayed, Alaa
    PAIN AND THERAPY, 2024, : 1407 - 1427
  • [36] TRANSCUTANEOUS AURICULAR VAGUS NERVE STIMULATION (TAVNS) AS A VERSATILE NEUROMODULATORY TOOL: BIOMARKERS OF NEURO TRANSMISSION AND EFFECTS ON BEHAVIOR
    Marzecova, Anna
    Skora, Lina
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 60 : S28 - S28
  • [37] Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Managing Pain: A Scoping Review
    Chen, Jie
    Kuang, Huan
    Chen, Aokun
    Dungan, Jennifer
    Cousin, Lakeshia
    Cong, Xiaomei
    Patel, Param
    Starkweather, Angela
    PAIN MANAGEMENT NURSING, 2025, 26 (01) : 33 - 39
  • [38] Complications of Implanted Vagus Nerve Stimulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kalagara, Roshini
    Chennareddy, Susmita
    Reford, Emma
    Bhimani, Abhiraj D.
    Cummins, Daniel D.
    Downes, Margaret H.
    Tosto, Jenna M.
    Bederson, Joshua B.
    Mocco, J.
    Putrino, David
    Kellner, Christopher P.
    Panov, Fedor
    CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2025, 54 (01) : 112 - 120
  • [39] Clinical application of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation: a scoping review
    Gerges, Ashraf N. H.
    Williams, Ellen
    Hillier, Susan
    Uy, Jeric
    Hamilton, Taya
    Chamberlain, Saran
    Hordacre, Brenton
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2024, 46 (24) : 5730 - 5760
  • [40] No modulation of pupil size and event-related pupil response by transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS)
    Marius Keute
    Mustafa Demirezen
    Alina Graf
    Notger G. Mueller
    Tino Zaehle
    Scientific Reports, 9