Safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS): a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Angela Yun Kim
Anna Marduy
Paulo S. de Melo
Anna Carolyna Gianlorenco
Chi Kyung Kim
Hyuk Choi
Jae-Jun Song
Felipe Fregni
机构
[1] Korea University Medical Center,Department of Otorhinolaryngology
[2] Uniao Metropolitana de Ensino e Cultura (UNIME) Salvador,Head and Neck Surgery
[3] Harvard Medical School,Neuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital
[4] Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saude Publica,Department of Medicine
[5] Federal University of Sao Carlos,Department of Physical Therapy
[6] Korea University Guro Hospital,Department of Neurology
[7] Korea University,Department of Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine
[8] Neurive Co.,undefined
[9] Ltd.,undefined
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) has been investigated as a novel neuromodulation tool. Although taVNS is generally considered safe with only mild and transient adverse effects (AEs), those specifically caused by taVNS have not yet been investigated. This systematic review and meta-analysis on taVNS aimed to (1) systematically analyze study characteristics and AE assessment, (2) characterize and analyze possible AEs and their incidence, (3) search for predictable risk factors, (4) analyze the severity of AE, and (5) suggest an evidence-based taVNS adverse events questionnaire for safety monitoring. The articles searched were published through April 7, 2022, in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Lilacs databases. In general, we evaluated 177 studies that assessed 6322 subjects. From these, 55.37% of studies did not mention the presence or absence of any AEs; only 24.86% of the studies described that at least one adverse event occurred. In the 35 studies reporting the number of subjects with at least one adverse event, a meta-analytic approach to calculate the risk differences of developing an adverse event between active taVNS and controls was used. The meta-analytic overall adverse events incidence rate was calculated for the total number of adverse events reported on a 100,000 person-minutes-days scale. There were no differences in risk of developing an adverse event between active taVNS and controls. The incidence of AE, in general, was 12.84/100,000 person-minutes-days of stimulation, and the most frequently reported were ear pain, headache, and tingling. Almost half of the studies did not report the presence or absence of any AEs. We attribute this to the absence of AE in those studies. There was no causal relationship between taVNS and severe adverse events. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis of transcutaneous auricular stimulation safety. Overall, taVNS is a safe and feasible option for clinical intervention.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation
    Ellrich, Jens
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 36 (06) : 437 - 442
  • [22] Is transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation effective and safe for primary insomnia? A PRISMA-compliant protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, Ting
    Cai, Yunhuo
    Li, Xingling
    Fang, Lianqiang
    Hu, Hantong
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (11):
  • [23] Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) decreases heart rate acutely in neonatal rats
    Gail, Melanie W.
    Sims-Robinson, Catrina
    Boger, Heather
    Ergul, Adviye
    Mukherjee, Rupak
    Jenkins, Dorothea D.
    George, Mark S.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2023, 16 (05) : 1240 - 1242
  • [24] Tragus or cymba conchae? Investigating the anatomical foundation of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS)
    Badran, Bashar W.
    Brown, Joshua C.
    Dowdle, Logan T.
    Mithoefer, Oliver J.
    LaBate, Nicholas T.
    Coatsworth, James
    DeVries, William H.
    Austelle, Christopher W.
    McTeague, Lisa M.
    Yu, Alfred
    Bikson, Marom
    Jenkins, Dorothea D.
    George, Mark S.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2018, 11 (04) : 947 - 948
  • [25] Efficacy and Safety of Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ananda, Roshan
    Roslan, Mohd Hariz Bin
    Wong, Lin Ling
    Botross, Nevein Philip
    Ngim, Chin Fang
    Mariapun, Jeevitha
    CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2023, 52 (03) : 239 - 250
  • [26] EFFECTS OF STIMULATION TYPE AND DURATION OF TRANSCUTANEOUS AURICULAR VAGUS NERVE STIMULATION (TAVNS) ON THE P300 RESPONSE
    Giraudier, Manon
    Ventura-Bort, Carlos
    Weymar, Mathias
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 61 : S116 - S116
  • [27] Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Wu, Kaymin
    Wang, Zipu
    Zhang, Yunxiao
    Yao, Jiahui
    Zhang, Zuyong
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 90 (04) : 467 - 471
  • [28] Safety and tolerability of Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve stimulation in humans; a systematic review
    Redgrave, J.
    Day, D.
    Leung, H.
    Laud, P. J.
    Ali, A.
    Lindert, R.
    Majid, A.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2018, 11 (06) : 1225 - 1238
  • [29] Does transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation alter pupil dilation? A living Bayesian meta-analysis
    Pervaz, Ipek
    Thurn, Lilly
    Vezzani, Cecilia
    Kaluza, Luisa
    Kuehnel, Anne
    Kroemer, Nils B.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2025, 18 (02) : 148 - 157
  • [30] EFFECTS OF TRANSCUTANEOUS AURICULAR VAGUS NERVE STIMULATION (taVNS) ON AUTONOMIC AND COGNITIVE RIGIDITY DURING PERSEVERATIVE COGNITION
    De Smet, Stefanie
    Ottaviani, Cristina
    Verkuil, Bart
    Baekena, Chris
    Vanderhasselt, Marie-Anne
    PSYCHIATRIA DANUBINA, 2022, 34 : 15 - 16