Safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS): a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Angela Yun Kim
Anna Marduy
Paulo S. de Melo
Anna Carolyna Gianlorenco
Chi Kyung Kim
Hyuk Choi
Jae-Jun Song
Felipe Fregni
机构
[1] Korea University Medical Center,Department of Otorhinolaryngology
[2] Uniao Metropolitana de Ensino e Cultura (UNIME) Salvador,Head and Neck Surgery
[3] Harvard Medical School,Neuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital
[4] Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saude Publica,Department of Medicine
[5] Federal University of Sao Carlos,Department of Physical Therapy
[6] Korea University Guro Hospital,Department of Neurology
[7] Korea University,Department of Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine
[8] Neurive Co.,undefined
[9] Ltd.,undefined
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) has been investigated as a novel neuromodulation tool. Although taVNS is generally considered safe with only mild and transient adverse effects (AEs), those specifically caused by taVNS have not yet been investigated. This systematic review and meta-analysis on taVNS aimed to (1) systematically analyze study characteristics and AE assessment, (2) characterize and analyze possible AEs and their incidence, (3) search for predictable risk factors, (4) analyze the severity of AE, and (5) suggest an evidence-based taVNS adverse events questionnaire for safety monitoring. The articles searched were published through April 7, 2022, in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Lilacs databases. In general, we evaluated 177 studies that assessed 6322 subjects. From these, 55.37% of studies did not mention the presence or absence of any AEs; only 24.86% of the studies described that at least one adverse event occurred. In the 35 studies reporting the number of subjects with at least one adverse event, a meta-analytic approach to calculate the risk differences of developing an adverse event between active taVNS and controls was used. The meta-analytic overall adverse events incidence rate was calculated for the total number of adverse events reported on a 100,000 person-minutes-days scale. There were no differences in risk of developing an adverse event between active taVNS and controls. The incidence of AE, in general, was 12.84/100,000 person-minutes-days of stimulation, and the most frequently reported were ear pain, headache, and tingling. Almost half of the studies did not report the presence or absence of any AEs. We attribute this to the absence of AE in those studies. There was no causal relationship between taVNS and severe adverse events. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis of transcutaneous auricular stimulation safety. Overall, taVNS is a safe and feasible option for clinical intervention.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS): a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kim, Angela Yun
    Marduy, Anna
    de Melo, Paulo S.
    Gianlorenco, Anna Carolyna
    Kim, Chi Kyung
    Choi, Hyuk
    Song, Jae-Jun
    Fregni, Felipe
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01):
  • [2] EFFECTS OF TRANSCUTANEOUS AURICULAR VAGUS NERVE STIMULATION (TAVNS) ON INTEROCEPTION
    Ventura-Bort, Carlos
    Schneider, Paula
    Weymar, Mathias
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 58 : S58 - S58
  • [3] Development, Safety, and Tolerability of a Novel Form of Noninvasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation: Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS)
    Badran, Bashar W.
    Glusman, Chloe E.
    Badran, Alan W.
    Austelle, Chris W.
    DeVries, William H.
    Borckhardt, Jeffrey J.
    George, Mark S.
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 79 (09) : 399S - 399S
  • [4] Development, Safety, and Tolerability of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS), a Novel Form of Noninvasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation
    Badran, Bashar W.
    Glusman, Chloe E.
    Badran, Alan W.
    Austelle, Christopher
    DeVries, William H.
    Borckardt, Jeffrey J.
    George, Mark S.
    NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2015, 40 : S518 - S519
  • [5] Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation in treating major depressive disorder A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wu, Chunxiao
    Liu, Peihui
    Fu, Huaili
    Chen, Wentao
    Cui, Shaoyang
    Lu, Liming
    Tang, Chunzhi
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (52)
  • [6] Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) for migraine: an fMRI study
    Zhang, Yue
    Huang, Yiting
    Li, Hui
    Yan, Zhaoxian
    Zhang, Ying
    Liu, Xian
    Hou, Xiaoyan
    Chen, Weicui
    Tu, Yiheng
    Hodges, Sierra
    Chen, Helen
    Liu, Bo
    Kong, Jian
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2021, 46 (02) : 145 - 150
  • [7] The efficacy and safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation in the treatment of depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Tan, Chaoren
    Qiao, Meng
    Ma, Yue
    Luo, Yi
    Fang, Jiliang
    Yang, Yongsheng
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2023, 337 : 37 - 49
  • [8] Feasibility and effectiveness of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) in awake mice
    Yu, Yu-Mei
    Yao, Rui
    Liu, Zhou-Liang
    Lu, Yao
    Zhu, Yang-Zi
    Cao, Jun-Li
    CNS NEUROSCIENCE & THERAPEUTICS, 2024, 30 (09)
  • [9] Modulatory effects of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) on attentional processes
    Chen, Yuxin
    Yang, Haoyu
    Wang, Faguang
    Lu, Xuejing
    Hu, Li
    GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 36 (06)
  • [10] The effect of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) on cognitive control in multitasking
    Sommer, Aldo
    Fischer, Rico
    Borges, Uirassu
    Laborde, Sylvain
    Achtzehn, Silvia
    Liepelt, Roman
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2023, 187