Fuzzy PROMETHEE GDSS for technical requirements ranking in HOQ

被引:0
|
作者
Seyyed Mahdi Hosseini Motlagh
Majid Behzadian
Joshua Ignatius
Mark Goh
Mohammad Mehdi Sepehri
Tan Kim Hua
机构
[1] Iran University of Science and Technology,School of Industrial Engineering
[2] Shomal University,School of Industrial Engineering
[3] Universiti Sains Malaysia,School of Mathematical Sciences
[4] National University of Singapore,Decision Sciences Department, School of Business
[5] RMIT University,School of Business IT and Logistics
[6] Tarbiat Modares University,Department of Industrial Engineering
[7] University of Nottingham,Nottingham Business School,
关键词
Fuzzy; GDSS; PROMETHEE; Quality function deployment; House of quality;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper provides a fuzzy Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE) in a Group Decision Support System (GDSS) approach to ranking the technical requirements for the house of quality (HOQ) process in multi-criteria product design. The problem under study involves incorporating the design alternatives of a group of designers located in different geographies who often provide vague and imprecise linguistic design information to the HOQ process. As such, the proposed fuzzy PROMETHEE GDSS allows the quality function deployment (QFD) team of designers to minimize any deviation arising from the individual designer preferences and to capture the ambiguity of the imprecise design information when expressing the importance of customer needs and to delineate the linkage between customer needs and the technical requirements. The approach advances the HOQ group decision-making context in two important aspects. First, it treats each criterion and decision maker (DM) as unique in terms of the preference function and threshold levels. Second, it facilitates a rapid communication among DMs for the HOQ process. A case of a design team for an ergonomic chair manufacturer serves to validate this approach.
引用
收藏
页码:1993 / 2002
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Fuzzy-Based PROMETHEE Method for Performance Ranking of SARS-CoV-2 IgM Antibody Tests
    Arikan, Ayse
    Sanlidag, Tamer
    Sayan, Murat
    Uzun, Berna
    Uzun Ozsahin, Dilber
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (11)
  • [22] Ranking sawability of dimension stone using PROMETHEE method
    Mikaeil, R.
    Kamran, M. Abdollahi
    Sadegheslam, G.
    Ataei, M.
    JOURNAL OF MINING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 6 (02): : 263 - 271
  • [23] Analysis of third alternatives' impact on PROMETHEE II ranking
    Coquelet, Boris
    Dejaegere, Gilles
    De Smet, Yves
    JOURNAL OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS, 2024, 31 (1-2)
  • [24] CARDINAL RANKING OF ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS - EXTENSION OF THE PROMETHEE METHOD
    DIAKOULAKI, D
    KOUMOUTSOS, N
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1991, 53 (03) : 337 - 347
  • [25] COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PROMETHEE AND FUZZY PROMETHEE METHODS IN EQUIPMENT SELECTION PROBLEM
    Yilmaz, Burcu
    Dagdeviren, Metin
    JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE OF GAZI UNIVERSITY, 2010, 25 (04): : 811 - 826
  • [26] Prioritizing Strategic Goals in Higher Education Organizations by Using a SWOT–PROMETHEE/GAIA–GDSS Model
    Živan Živković
    Djordje Nikolić
    Marija Savić
    Predrag Djordjević
    Ivan Mihajlović
    Group Decision and Negotiation, 2017, 26 : 829 - 846
  • [27] Importance measures for customer requirements and technical attributes in fuzzy environment
    Li, X. D.
    Tu, Y. L.
    Xue, D. Y.
    Dong, Y.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 17TH IASTED INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION, 2006, : 193 - +
  • [28] One kind of fuzzy PROMETHEE method
    Wang Hang-yu
    Sun Shi-yan
    Proceedings of 2006 Chinese Control and Decision Conference, 2006, : 1215 - +
  • [29] Hesitant-Fuzzy-Promethee method
    Hajlaoui, Sonia
    Halouani, Nesrin
    2013 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MODELING, SIMULATION AND APPLIED OPTIMIZATION (ICMSAO), 2013,
  • [30] Identifying a Personalized Anesthetic with Fuzzy PROMETHEE
    Ozsahin, Ilker
    HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS RESEARCH, 2020, 26 (03) : 201 - 211