Fuzzy-Based PROMETHEE Method for Performance Ranking of SARS-CoV-2 IgM Antibody Tests

被引:5
|
作者
Arikan, Ayse [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sanlidag, Tamer [1 ]
Sayan, Murat [1 ,4 ]
Uzun, Berna [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Uzun Ozsahin, Dilber [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Near East Univ, DESAM Res Inst, TRNC Mersin 10, TR-99138 Nicosia, Turkey
[2] Near East Univ, Dept Med Microbiol & Clin Microbiol, Fac Med, TRNC Mersin 10, TR-99138 Nicosia, Turkey
[3] Kyrenia Univ, Dept Med Microbiol & Clin Microbiol, TRNC Mersin 10, TR-99320 Kyrenia, Turkey
[4] Kocaeli Univ, Res & Educ Hosp, PCR Unit, TR-41001 Kocaeli, Turkey
[5] Carlos III Madrid Univ, Dept Stat, Getafe 28903, Spain
[6] Near East Univ, Dept Math, TRNC Mersin 10, TR-99138 Nicosia, Turkey
[7] Near East Univ, Operat Res Ctr Healthcare, TRNC Mersin 10, TR-99138 Nicosia, Turkey
[8] Sharjah Univ, Dept Med Diagnost Imaging, Coll Hlth Sci, Sharjah 27272, U Arab Emirates
关键词
SARS-CoV-2; IgM; COVID-19; fuzzy logic; PROMETHEE; MCDM;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics12112830
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Antibody tests, widely used as a complementary approach to reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction testing in identifying COVID-19 cases, are used to measure antibodies developed for COVID-19. This study aimed to evaluate the different parameters of the FDA-authorized SARS-CoV-2 IgM antibody tests and to rank them according to their performance levels. In the study, we involved 27 antibody tests, and the analyzes were performed using the fuzzy preference ranking organization method for the enrichment evaluation model, a multi-criteria decision-making model. While criteria such as analytical sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were evaluated in the study, the ranking was reported by determining the importance levels of the criteria. According to our evaluation, Innovita 2019-nCoV Ab Test (colloidal gold) was at the top of the ranking. While Cellex qSARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM Rapid Test and Assure COVID-19 IgG/IgM Rapid Tester ranked second and third on the list, the InBios-SCoV 2 Detect Ig M ELISA Rapid Test Kit was determined as the least preferable. The fuzzy preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation, which has been applied to many fields, can help decision-makers choose the appropriate antibody test for managing COVID-19 in controlling the global pandemic.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Developing antibody tests for SARS-CoV-2
    Petherick, Anna
    LANCET, 2020, 395 (10230): : 1101 - 1102
  • [2] Clinical performance of different SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody tests
    Kohmer, Niko
    Westhaus, Sandra
    Ruehl, Cornelia
    Ciesek, Sandra
    Rabenau, Holger F.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2020, 92 (10) : 2243 - 2247
  • [3] Validation and performance comparison of two SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM rapid tests
    Awaji, Nisreen Naser Al
    Ahmedah, Hanadi Talal
    Alsaady, Isra Mohammed
    Bawaked, Rowaedh Ahmed
    Alraey, Mohammed A.
    Alasiri, Ahmed Ayed
    Alfaifi, Abdullah Mofareh
    Alshehri, Hamdan Ali
    Alserihi, Raed
    Yasin, Elrashed B.
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 28 (06) : 3433 - 3437
  • [4] Evaluation of the correlation between the access SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG II antibody tests with the SARS-CoV-2 surrogate virus neutralization test
    Kitagawa, Yutaro
    Imai, Kazuo
    Matsuoka, Masaru
    Fukada, Ai
    Kubota, Katsumi
    Sato, Momoko
    Takada, Tomohito
    Noguchi, Sakiko
    Tarumoto, Norihito
    Maesaki, Shigefumi
    Takeuchi, Shinichi
    Maeda, Takuya
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2022, 94 (01) : 335 - 341
  • [5] Comparison of the clinical performance and usefulness of five SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests
    Wakita, Mitsuru
    Idei, Mayumi
    Saito, Kaori
    Horiuchi, Yuki
    Yamatani, Kotoko
    Ishikawa, Suzuka
    Yamamoto, Takamasa
    Igawa, Gene
    Hinata, Masanobu
    Kadota, Katsuhiko
    Kurosawa, Taro
    Takahashi, Sho
    Saito, Takumi
    Misawa, Shigeki
    Akazawa, Chihiro
    Naito, Toshio
    Miida, Takashi
    Takahashi, Kazuhisa
    Ai, Tomohiko
    Tabe, Yoko
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (02):
  • [6] Clinical Performance of SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM Tests Using an Automated Chemiluminescent Assay
    Zhou, Jin-an
    Zeng, Hao-long
    Deng, Ling-yan
    Li, Hui-jun
    CURRENT MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 41 (02) : 318 - 322
  • [7] Clinical Performance of SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM Tests Using an Automated Chemiluminescent Assay
    Jin-an Zhou
    Hao-long Zeng
    Ling-yan Deng
    Hui-jun Li
    Current Medical Science, 2021, 41 : 318 - 322
  • [8] Diagnostic Properties of Three SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Tests
    Basgalupp, Suelen
    dos Santos, Giovana
    Bessel, Marina
    Garcia, Lara
    de Moura, Ana Carolina
    Rocha, Ana Carolina
    Brito, Emerson
    de Miranda, Giovana
    Dornelles, Thayane
    Dartora, William
    Pellanda, Lucia
    Hallal, Pedro
    Wendland, Eliana
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 11 (08)
  • [9] Clinical Performance of SARS-CoV-2 Molecular Tests
    Green, Daniel A.
    Zucker, Jason
    Westblade, Lars F.
    Whittier, Susan
    Rennert, Hanna
    Velu, Priya
    Craney, Arryn
    Cushing, Melissa
    Liu, Dakai
    Sobieszczyk, Magdalena E.
    Boehme, Amelia K.
    Sepulveda, Jorge L.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 58 (08)
  • [10] RAPID SEROLOGICAL TESTS FOR SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM - NOT WORTH ATTENTION?
    Krygier, Rafal
    Stepien, Piotr M.
    Zarebska-Michaluk, Dorota
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2021, 34 (02) : 203 - 209