Fuzzy PROMETHEE GDSS for technical requirements ranking in HOQ

被引:0
|
作者
Seyyed Mahdi Hosseini Motlagh
Majid Behzadian
Joshua Ignatius
Mark Goh
Mohammad Mehdi Sepehri
Tan Kim Hua
机构
[1] Iran University of Science and Technology,School of Industrial Engineering
[2] Shomal University,School of Industrial Engineering
[3] Universiti Sains Malaysia,School of Mathematical Sciences
[4] National University of Singapore,Decision Sciences Department, School of Business
[5] RMIT University,School of Business IT and Logistics
[6] Tarbiat Modares University,Department of Industrial Engineering
[7] University of Nottingham,Nottingham Business School,
关键词
Fuzzy; GDSS; PROMETHEE; Quality function deployment; House of quality;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper provides a fuzzy Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE) in a Group Decision Support System (GDSS) approach to ranking the technical requirements for the house of quality (HOQ) process in multi-criteria product design. The problem under study involves incorporating the design alternatives of a group of designers located in different geographies who often provide vague and imprecise linguistic design information to the HOQ process. As such, the proposed fuzzy PROMETHEE GDSS allows the quality function deployment (QFD) team of designers to minimize any deviation arising from the individual designer preferences and to capture the ambiguity of the imprecise design information when expressing the importance of customer needs and to delineate the linkage between customer needs and the technical requirements. The approach advances the HOQ group decision-making context in two important aspects. First, it treats each criterion and decision maker (DM) as unique in terms of the preference function and threshold levels. Second, it facilitates a rapid communication among DMs for the HOQ process. A case of a design team for an ergonomic chair manufacturer serves to validate this approach.
引用
收藏
页码:1993 / 2002
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Inverse optimization on the evaluations of alternatives in the PROMETHEE II ranking method
    Flachs, Alexandre
    De Smet, Yves
    OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2025, 136
  • [32] The ranking of districts in Ouagadougou by the risk of flood and runoff using the PROMETHEE
    Yougbare, Jacob Wendpanga
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PURE AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2019, 12 (04): : 1731 - 1743
  • [33] Promethee γ: A new Promethee based method for partial ranking based on valued coalitions of monocriterion net flow scores
    Dejaegere, Gilles
    De Smet, Yves
    JOURNAL OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS, 2023, 30 (3-4) : 147 - 160
  • [34] Performance indicators for municipal solid waste management systems in Saudi Arabia: selection and ranking using fuzzy AHP and PROMETHEE II
    Hatem Abdulaziz AlHumid
    Husnain Haider
    Saleem S. AlSaleem
    Md. Shafiquzamman
    Rehan Sadiq
    Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2019, 12
  • [35] A FUZZY RANKING OF FUZZY NUMBERS
    BUCKLEY, JJ
    FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1989, 33 (01) : 119 - 121
  • [36] Generalization of Fermatean Fuzzy Set and Implementation of Fermatean Fuzzy PROMETHEE II Method for Decision Making via PROMETHEE GAIA
    Aruchsamy, Revathy
    Velusamy, Inthumathi
    Sanmugavel, Krishnaprakash
    Dhandapani, Prasantha Bharathi
    Ramasamy, Kavikumar
    AXIOMS, 2024, 13 (06)
  • [37] Performance indicators for municipal solid waste management systems in Saudi Arabia: selection and ranking using fuzzy AHP and PROMETHEE II
    AlHumid, Hatem Abdulaziz
    Haider, Husnain
    AlSaleem, Saleem S.
    Shafiquzamman, Md.
    Sadiq, Rehan
    ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2019, 12 (15)
  • [38] Consumer Satisfaction Benchmarking Analysis Using Group Decision Support System (GDSS) PROMETHEE Methodology in a GIS Environment
    Saridou, Anastasia S.
    Vavatsikos, Athanasios P.
    INFORMATION, 2024, 15 (11)
  • [39] FUZZY PROMETHEE ANALYSIS OF LEUKEMIA TREATMENT TECHNIQUES
    Ozsahin, I
    Ozsahin, D. Uzun
    Maisaini, M.
    Mok, G. S. P.
    WORLD CANCER RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2019, 6
  • [40] Prioritizing Strategic Goals in Higher Education Organizations by Using a SWOT-PROMETHEE/GAIA-GDSS Model
    Zivkovic, Zivan
    Nikolic, Djordje
    Savic, Marija
    Djordjevic, Predrag
    Mihajlovic, Ivan
    GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2017, 26 (04) : 829 - 846