Bayesian lithology/fluid inversion—comparison of two algorithms

被引:0
|
作者
Marit Ulvmoen
Hugo Hammer
机构
[1] Norwegian University of Science and Technology,
[2] Oslo University College,undefined
来源
Computational Geosciences | 2010年 / 14卷
关键词
Seismic inversion; Lithology-fluid prediction; Empirical evaluation; Bayesian model; Forward–backward algorithm;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Algorithms for inversion of seismic prestack AVO data into lithology-fluid classes in a vertical profile are evaluated. The inversion is defined in a Bayesian setting where the prior model for the lithology-fluid classes is a Markov chain, and the likelihood model relates seismic data and elastic material properties to these classes. The likelihood model is approximated such that the posterior model can be calculated recursively using the extremely efficient forward–backward algorithm. The impact of the approximation in the likelihood model is evaluated empirically by comparing results from the approximate approach with results generated from the exact posterior model. The exact posterior is assessed by sampling using a sophisticated Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation algorithm. The simulation algorithm is iterative, and it requires considerable computer resources. Seven realistic evaluation models are defined, from which synthetic seismic data are generated. Using identical seismic data, the approximate marginal posterior is calculated and the exact marginal posterior is assessed. It is concluded that the approximate likelihood model preserves 50% to 90% of the information content in the exact likelihood model.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 367
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Inversion of micromechanical powder consolidation and sintering models using Bayesian inference and genetic algorithms
    Reardon, BJ
    MODELLING AND SIMULATION IN MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 1999, 7 (06) : 1061 - 1081
  • [42] Application and Comparison of Bayesian Framework Algorithms for Underwater State Estimation
    Divya, G. Naga
    Rao, S. Koteswara
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON OCEAN TECHNOLOGY (SYMPOL 2019), 2019, : 10 - 20
  • [43] Comparison of the performances of decision aimed algorithms with Bayesian and beliefs basis
    Delmotte, F
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2001, 16 (08) : 963 - 981
  • [44] MCMC algorithms for two recent Bayesian limited information estimators
    Gao, CM
    Lahiri, K
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2000, 66 (02) : 121 - 126
  • [45] Approximate inference algorithms for two-layer Bayesian networks
    Ng, AY
    Jordan, MI
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 12, 2000, 12 : 533 - 539
  • [46] Inversion of Bayesian networks
    van Oostrum, Jesse
    van Hintum, Peter
    Ay, Nihat
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2024, 164
  • [47] Bayesian Dix inversion
    Buland, Arild
    Kolbjornsen, Odd
    Carter, Andrew J.
    GEOPHYSICS, 2011, 76 (02) : R15 - R22
  • [48] Distributed Suffix Array Construction Algorithms: Comparison of Two Algorithms
    Metwally, Ahmed A.
    Kandil, Ahmed H.
    Abouelhoda, Mohamed
    2016 8TH CAIRO INTERNATIONAL BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (CIBEC), 2016, : 27 - 30
  • [49] Efficient computation for Bayesian comparison of two proportions
    Schmidt, Mikkel N.
    Morup, Morten
    STATISTICS & PROBABILITY LETTERS, 2019, 145 : 57 - 62
  • [50] A comparison of two Bayesian approaches for uncertainty quantification
    Mara, Thierry A.
    Delay, Frederick
    Lehmann, Francois
    Younes, Anis
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2016, 82 : 21 - 30