Bayesian lithology/fluid inversion—comparison of two algorithms

被引:0
|
作者
Marit Ulvmoen
Hugo Hammer
机构
[1] Norwegian University of Science and Technology,
[2] Oslo University College,undefined
来源
Computational Geosciences | 2010年 / 14卷
关键词
Seismic inversion; Lithology-fluid prediction; Empirical evaluation; Bayesian model; Forward–backward algorithm;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Algorithms for inversion of seismic prestack AVO data into lithology-fluid classes in a vertical profile are evaluated. The inversion is defined in a Bayesian setting where the prior model for the lithology-fluid classes is a Markov chain, and the likelihood model relates seismic data and elastic material properties to these classes. The likelihood model is approximated such that the posterior model can be calculated recursively using the extremely efficient forward–backward algorithm. The impact of the approximation in the likelihood model is evaluated empirically by comparing results from the approximate approach with results generated from the exact posterior model. The exact posterior is assessed by sampling using a sophisticated Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation algorithm. The simulation algorithm is iterative, and it requires considerable computer resources. Seven realistic evaluation models are defined, from which synthetic seismic data are generated. Using identical seismic data, the approximate marginal posterior is calculated and the exact marginal posterior is assessed. It is concluded that the approximate likelihood model preserves 50% to 90% of the information content in the exact likelihood model.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 367
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Lithology and fluid prediction from simultaneous seismic inversion over Sandfish field, Niger Delta, Nigeria
    Lukumon Adeoti
    Oluwakemi Y. Adesanya
    Kayode F. Oyedele
    Itsemode P. Afinotan
    Ayo Adekanle
    Geosciences Journal, 2018, 22 : 155 - 169
  • [22] Lithology and fluid prediction from simultaneous seismic inversion over Sandfish field, Niger Delta, Nigeria
    Adeoti, Lukumon
    Adesanya, Oluwakemi Y.
    Oyedele, Kayode F.
    Afinotan, Itsemode P.
    Adekanle, Ayo
    GEOSCIENCES JOURNAL, 2018, 22 (01) : 155 - 169
  • [23] Comparison of algorithms for matrix inversion with multi-quarks
    Ying, HP
    Dong, SJ
    Liu, KF
    NUCLEAR PHYSICS B, 1997, : 993 - 996
  • [24] Comparison of inversion algorithms for HF radar wave measurements
    Atanga, JN
    Wyatt, LR
    IEEE JOURNAL OF OCEANIC ENGINEERING, 1997, 22 (04) : 593 - 603
  • [25] A comparison of Inversion Based Iterative Learning Control Algorithms
    Teng, Kuo-Tai
    Tsao, Tsu-Chin
    2015 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ACC), 2015, : 3564 - 3569
  • [26] Comparison of inversion algorithms for HF radar wave measurements
    Atanga, JN
    Wyatt, LR
    SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING IN OCEANOGRAPHY - TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER FROM RESEARCH TO INDUSTRY, 1997, (439): : 204 - 210
  • [28] Prestack AVA inversion for pore fluid modulus based on the Bayesian theory
    Li, Chao
    Yin, Xingyao
    Zhang, Guangzhi
    Liu, Qian
    Zhang, Shixin
    Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2015, 54 (04) : 467 - 476
  • [29] Lithology and fluid prediction from prestack seismic data using a Bayesian model with Markov process prior
    Hammer, Hugo
    Kolbjornsen, Odd
    Tjelmeland, Hakon
    Buland, Arild
    GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2012, 60 (03) : 500 - 515
  • [30] A comparison of computational algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of clinical trials
    Chen, Ziming
    Berger, Jeffrey S.
    Castellucci, Lana A.
    Farkouh, Michael
    Goligher, Ewan C.
    Hade, Erinn M.
    Hunt, Beverley J.
    Kornblith, Lucy Z.
    Laweler, Patrick R.
    Leifer, Eric S.
    Lorenzi, Elizabeth
    Neal, Matthew D.
    Zarychanski, Ryan
    Heath, Anna
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2024, 21 (06) : 689 - 700