Fundamental differences between glassy dynamics in two and three dimensions

被引:0
|
作者
Elijah Flenner
Grzegorz Szamel
机构
[1] Colorado State University,Department of Chemistry
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The two-dimensional freezing transition is very different from its three-dimensional counterpart. In contrast, the glass transition is usually assumed to have similar characteristics in two and three dimensions. Using computer simulations, here we show that glassy dynamics in supercooled two- and three-dimensional fluids are fundamentally different. Specifically, transient localization of particles on approaching the glass transition is absent in two dimensions, whereas it is very pronounced in three dimensions. Moreover, the temperature dependence of the relaxation time of orientational correlations is decoupled from that of the translational relaxation time in two dimensions but not in three dimensions. Last, the relationships between the characteristic size of dynamically heterogeneous regions and the relaxation time are very different in two and three dimensions. These results strongly suggest that the glass transition in two dimensions is different than in three dimensions.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fundamental differences between glassy dynamics in two and three dimensions
    Szamel, Grzegorz
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 253
  • [2] Fundamental differences between glassy dynamics in two and three dimensions
    Flenner, Elijah
    Szamel, Grzegorz
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2015, 6
  • [3] Fluctuating loops and glassy dynamics of a pinned line in two dimensions
    Eriksson, AB
    Kinaret, JM
    Mikheev, LV
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 1996, 54 (05): : 2984 - 2987
  • [4] Freezing between two and three dimensions
    Schmidt, M
    Lowen, H
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1996, 76 (24) : 4552 - 4555
  • [5] Critical fluid dynamics in two and three dimensions
    Chattopadhyay, Chandrodoy
    Ott, Josh
    Schafer, Thomas
    Skokov, Vladimir V.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2025, 111 (03)
  • [6] Differences between carotid wall morphological phenotypes measured by ultrasound in one, two and three dimensions
    Al-Shali, K
    House, AA
    Hanley, AJG
    Khan, HMR
    Harris, SB
    Mamakeesick, M
    Zinman, B
    Fenster, A
    Spence, JD
    Hegele, RA
    ATHEROSCLEROSIS, 2005, 178 (02) : 319 - 325
  • [7] COLLOIDAL CRYSTALLIZATION BETWEEN TWO AND THREE DIMENSIONS
    Loewen, H.
    Oguz, E. C.
    Assoud, L.
    Messina, R.
    ADVANCES IN CHEMICAL PHYSICS, VOL 148, 2012, 148 : 225 - 249
  • [8] Fundamental differences between two fiber types in Acer
    Vazquez-Cooz, Iris
    Meyer, Robert W.
    IAWA JOURNAL, 2008, 29 (02) : 129 - 141
  • [9] Fundamental transfer matrix and dynamical formulation of stationary scattering in two and three dimensions
    Loran, Farhang
    Mostafazadeh, Ali
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2021, 104 (03)
  • [10] Relationships between two fundamental dimensions of life: mental health and religion
    Dalgalarrondo, Paulo
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE PSIQUIATRIA, 2006, 28 (03) : 177 - 178