Fundamental differences between glassy dynamics in two and three dimensions

被引:138
|
作者
Flenner, Elijah [1 ]
Szamel, Grzegorz [1 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Chem, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
来源
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 2015年 / 6卷
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
MODE-COUPLING THEORY; MICROSCOPIC DYNAMICS; SUPERCOOLED LIQUID; MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS; RELAXATION; TEMPERATURE; TRANSITION; ORDER;
D O I
10.1038/ncomms8392
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The two-dimensional freezing transition is very different from its three-dimensional counterpart. In contrast, the glass transition is usually assumed to have similar characteristics in two and three dimensions. Using computer simulations, here we show that glassy dynamics in supercooled two- and three-dimensional fluids are fundamentally different. Specifically, transient localization of particles on approaching the glass transition is absent in two dimensions, whereas it is very pronounced in three dimensions. Moreover, the temperature dependence of the relaxation time of orientational correlations is decoupled from that of the translational relaxation time in two dimensions but not in three dimensions. Last, the relationships between the characteristic size of dynamically heterogeneous regions and the relaxation time are very different in two and three dimensions. These results strongly suggest that the glass transition in two dimensions is different than in three dimensions.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fundamental differences between glassy dynamics in two and three dimensions
    Elijah Flenner
    Grzegorz Szamel
    Nature Communications, 6
  • [2] Fundamental differences between glassy dynamics in two and three dimensions
    Szamel, Grzegorz
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 253
  • [3] Fluctuating loops and glassy dynamics of a pinned line in two dimensions
    Eriksson, AB
    Kinaret, JM
    Mikheev, LV
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 1996, 54 (05): : 2984 - 2987
  • [4] Freezing between two and three dimensions
    Schmidt, M
    Lowen, H
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1996, 76 (24) : 4552 - 4555
  • [5] Critical fluid dynamics in two and three dimensions
    Chattopadhyay, Chandrodoy
    Ott, Josh
    Schafer, Thomas
    Skokov, Vladimir V.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2025, 111 (03)
  • [6] Differences between carotid wall morphological phenotypes measured by ultrasound in one, two and three dimensions
    Al-Shali, K
    House, AA
    Hanley, AJG
    Khan, HMR
    Harris, SB
    Mamakeesick, M
    Zinman, B
    Fenster, A
    Spence, JD
    Hegele, RA
    ATHEROSCLEROSIS, 2005, 178 (02) : 319 - 325
  • [7] COLLOIDAL CRYSTALLIZATION BETWEEN TWO AND THREE DIMENSIONS
    Loewen, H.
    Oguz, E. C.
    Assoud, L.
    Messina, R.
    ADVANCES IN CHEMICAL PHYSICS, VOL 148, 2012, 148 : 225 - 249
  • [8] Fundamental differences between two fiber types in Acer
    Vazquez-Cooz, Iris
    Meyer, Robert W.
    IAWA JOURNAL, 2008, 29 (02) : 129 - 141
  • [9] Fundamental transfer matrix and dynamical formulation of stationary scattering in two and three dimensions
    Loran, Farhang
    Mostafazadeh, Ali
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2021, 104 (03)
  • [10] Relationships between two fundamental dimensions of life: mental health and religion
    Dalgalarrondo, Paulo
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE PSIQUIATRIA, 2006, 28 (03) : 177 - 178