Fundamental differences between glassy dynamics in two and three dimensions

被引:0
|
作者
Elijah Flenner
Grzegorz Szamel
机构
[1] Colorado State University,Department of Chemistry
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The two-dimensional freezing transition is very different from its three-dimensional counterpart. In contrast, the glass transition is usually assumed to have similar characteristics in two and three dimensions. Using computer simulations, here we show that glassy dynamics in supercooled two- and three-dimensional fluids are fundamentally different. Specifically, transient localization of particles on approaching the glass transition is absent in two dimensions, whereas it is very pronounced in three dimensions. Moreover, the temperature dependence of the relaxation time of orientational correlations is decoupled from that of the translational relaxation time in two dimensions but not in three dimensions. Last, the relationships between the characteristic size of dynamically heterogeneous regions and the relaxation time are very different in two and three dimensions. These results strongly suggest that the glass transition in two dimensions is different than in three dimensions.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Airway volume analysis: is there a correlation between two and three-dimensions?
    Martins, Luize Severo
    Liedke, Gabriela Salatino
    Dias da-Silveira, Heraldo Luis
    da Silveira, Priscila Fernanda
    Arus, Nadia Assein
    Ongkosuwito, Edwin M.
    Vizzotto, Mariana Boessio
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2018, 40 (03) : 262 - 267
  • [22] Surface chemistry in three dimensions: CO dissociation between two surfaces
    Bollinger, MV
    Jacobsen, KW
    Norskov, JK
    CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS, 2000, 322 (05) : 307 - 311
  • [23] Contraction of excess fibres between the Mckay correspondences in dimensions two and three
    Boissiere, Samuel
    Sarti, Alessandra
    ANNALES DE L INSTITUT FOURIER, 2007, 57 (06) : 1839 - 1861
  • [24] Cooperative dynamics in two dimensions
    Zangi, R
    Rice, SA
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2004, 92 (03) : 4
  • [25] Fundamental Differences in Emulsification Principle between Three-phase Emulsification and Conventional Methods
    Miyasaka, Kana
    Imai, Yoko
    Tajima, Kazuo
    JOURNAL OF OLEO SCIENCE, 2020, 69 (12) : 1551 - 1560
  • [26] Compensation between warmth and competence: Antecedents and consequences of a negative relation between the two fundamental dimensions of social perception
    Kervyn, Nicolas
    Yzerbyt, Vincent
    Judd, Charles M.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 21 : 155 - 187
  • [27] Flux rope dynamics in three dimensions
    Sears, J.
    Feng, Y.
    Intrator, T. P.
    Weber, T. E.
    Swan, H. O.
    PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION, 2014, 56 (09)
  • [28] Constraint dynamics and gravitons in three dimensions
    Park, Mu-In
    JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS, 2008, (09):
  • [29] Mapping grains and their dynamics in three dimensions
    Sorensen, HO
    Jakobsen, B
    Knudsen, E
    Lauridsen, EM
    Nielsen, SF
    Poulsen, HF
    Schmidt, S
    Winther, G
    Margulies, L
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION B-BEAM INTERACTIONS WITH MATERIALS AND ATOMS, 2006, 246 (01): : 232 - 237
  • [30] NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS ON GLASSY CHARGE DENSITY WAVES IN THREE DIMENSIONS.
    Abe, Shuji
    1600, (143): : 1 - 3