Shaping ecological risk research for synthetic biology

被引:0
|
作者
Kuiken T. [1 ]
Dana G. [2 ]
Oye K. [3 ]
Rejeski D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Science and Technology Innovation Program, Woodrow Wilson Center, WA, DC, 20004, 1300 Pennsylvania Ave, NW
[2] Dana and Sharpe Risk Associates, Arlington, VA
[3] Engineering Systems Division and Department of Political Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Ecological risk; Gene flow; Genetically modified organisms; Synthetic biology; Trading zones;
D O I
10.1007/s13412-014-0171-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Synthetic biology is an interdisciplinary field that brings together biology and engineering at its core. Understanding and evaluating the ecological effects of synthetic biology applications also require broad interdisciplinary convergence and the ability to adapt to rapid technological developments. This article describes a series of workshops designed to provide a space for interdisciplinary groups of synthetic biologists, natural and social scientists, and other stakeholders to identify priority ecological hazards and to begin to design research programs to inform ecological risk assessments and risk management of synthetic biology applications. Participants identified gene flow, fitness, and competition as the key hazards of synthetic biology applications using engineered microorganisms. The rapid pace of synthetic biology research and product development, the potential environmental release of numerous applications, and the diffuse and diverse nature of the research community are prompting renewed attention on how to design robust ecological risk research programs to investigate such hazards. © 2014 AESS.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 199
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Q&A: Life, synthetic biology and risk
    Steven A Benner
    BMC Biology, 8
  • [32] Shaping biology: The National Science Foundation and American Biological Research
    Solovey, M
    ISIS, 2002, 93 (02) : 280 - 281
  • [33] Shaping a Plant Genetics and Molecular Biology research community in Brazil
    Van Sluys, Marie-Anne
    GENETICS AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2017, 40 (01) : I - I
  • [34] Examining expertise: Synthetic biology experts' perceptions of risk, benefit, and the public for research and applications regulation
    Wirz, Christopher D.
    Howell, Emily L.
    Scheufele, Dietram A.
    Brossard, Dominique
    Xenos, Michael A.
    PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2023, 32 (07) : 870 - 888
  • [35] Reflections on the practice of Responsible (Research and) Innovation in synthetic biology
    Taylor, Ken
    Woods, Simon
    NEW GENETICS AND SOCIETY, 2020, 39 (02) : 127 - 147
  • [36] Intrinsic responsible innovation in a synthetic biology research project
    Taylor, Ken
    Woods, Simon
    Johns, Alex
    Murray, Heath
    NEW GENETICS AND SOCIETY, 2023, 42 (01)
  • [37] Authorship Pattern and Research Collaboration in the Field of Synthetic Biology
    Naheem, K. T.
    Sivaraman, P.
    QUALITATIVE & QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN LIBRARIES, 2022, 11 (04): : 647 - 668
  • [38] Progress in the Research of Synthetic Biology in Construction of Engineered Microorganisms
    Gao X.
    Liu Y.
    Jiang Z.
    Zeng Q.
    Liu S.
    Liu X.
    Min W.
    Shipin Kexue/Food Science, 2022, 43 (15): : 256 - 264
  • [39] MIT and Pfizer collaborate to advance synthetic biology research
    Thorne, Jessica
    PHARMACEUTICAL BIOPROCESSING, 2014, 2 (02) : 112 - 112
  • [40] Leveraging synthetic biology approaches in plant hormone research
    Zhao, Chengsong
    Yaschenko, Anna
    Alonso, Jose M.
    Stepanova, Anna N.
    CURRENT OPINION IN PLANT BIOLOGY, 2021, 60