Shaping ecological risk research for synthetic biology

被引:0
|
作者
Kuiken T. [1 ]
Dana G. [2 ]
Oye K. [3 ]
Rejeski D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Science and Technology Innovation Program, Woodrow Wilson Center, WA, DC, 20004, 1300 Pennsylvania Ave, NW
[2] Dana and Sharpe Risk Associates, Arlington, VA
[3] Engineering Systems Division and Department of Political Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Ecological risk; Gene flow; Genetically modified organisms; Synthetic biology; Trading zones;
D O I
10.1007/s13412-014-0171-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Synthetic biology is an interdisciplinary field that brings together biology and engineering at its core. Understanding and evaluating the ecological effects of synthetic biology applications also require broad interdisciplinary convergence and the ability to adapt to rapid technological developments. This article describes a series of workshops designed to provide a space for interdisciplinary groups of synthetic biologists, natural and social scientists, and other stakeholders to identify priority ecological hazards and to begin to design research programs to inform ecological risk assessments and risk management of synthetic biology applications. Participants identified gene flow, fitness, and competition as the key hazards of synthetic biology applications using engineered microorganisms. The rapid pace of synthetic biology research and product development, the potential environmental release of numerous applications, and the diffuse and diverse nature of the research community are prompting renewed attention on how to design robust ecological risk research programs to investigate such hazards. © 2014 AESS.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 199
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] CSBB: synthetic biology research at Newcastle University
    Goni-Moreno, Angel
    Wipat, Anil
    Krasnogor, Natalio
    BIOCHEMICAL SOCIETY TRANSACTIONS, 2017, 45 : 781 - 783
  • [22] Synthetic biology: An emerging research field in China
    Pei, Lei
    Schmidt, Markus
    Wei, Wei
    BIOTECHNOLOGY ADVANCES, 2011, 29 (06) : 804 - 814
  • [23] Research on small genomes: Implications for synthetic biology
    Klasson, Lisa
    Andersson, Siv G. E.
    BIOESSAYS, 2010, 32 (04) : 288 - 295
  • [24] Research Progress on the Synthetic Biology of Botanical Biopesticides
    Zhao, Jianbo
    Liang, Dongmei
    Li, Weiguo
    Yan, Xiaoguang
    Qiao, Jianjun
    Caiyin, Qinggele
    BIOENGINEERING-BASEL, 2022, 9 (05):
  • [25] Synthetic biology for basic and applied plant research
    Benning, Christoph
    Sweetlove, Lee
    PLANT JOURNAL, 2016, 87 (01): : 3 - 4
  • [26] A wish list for synthetic biology in photosynthesis research
    Zhu, Xin-Guang
    Ort, Donald R.
    Parry, Martin A. J.
    von Caemmerer, Susanne
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2020, 71 (07) : 2219 - 2225
  • [27] Q&A: Life, synthetic biology and risk
    Benner, Steven A.
    BMC BIOLOGY, 2010, 8
  • [28] Synthetic Biology, Genome Editing, and the Risk of Bioterrorism
    Marko Ahteensuu
    Science and Engineering Ethics, 2017, 23 : 1541 - 1561
  • [29] Scientific Opinion on Risk Assessment of Synthetic Biology
    Epstein, Michelle M.
    Vermeire, Theo
    TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2016, 34 (08) : 601 - 603
  • [30] Synthetic Biology, Genome Editing, and the Risk of Bioterrorism
    Ahteensuu, Marko
    SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2017, 23 (06) : 1541 - 1561