Liquidity connectedness in cryptocurrency market

被引:0
|
作者
Mudassar Hasan
Muhammad Abubakr Naeem
Muhammad Arif
Syed Jawad Hussain Shahzad
Xuan Vinh Vo
机构
[1] The University of Lahore,Lahore Business School
[2] University College Dublin,Smurfit Graduate School of Business
[3] University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City,Institute of Business Research
[4] Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University,Department of Business Administration
[5] Montpellier Business School,Institute of Business Research and CFVG
[6] South Ural State University,undefined
[7] University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City,undefined
来源
关键词
Liquidity; Time–frequency connectedness; Cryptocurrencies; C10; C32; G01; G15;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We examine the dynamics of liquidity connectedness in the cryptocurrency market. We use the connectedness models of Diebold and Yilmaz (Int J Forecast 28(1):57–66, 2012) and Baruník and Křehlík (J Financ Econom 16(2):271–296, 2018) on a sample of six major cryptocurrencies, namely, Bitcoin (BTC), Litecoin (LTC), Ethereum (ETH), Ripple (XRP), Monero (XMR), and Dash. Our static analysis reveals a moderate liquidity connectedness among our sample cryptocurrencies, whereas BTC and LTC play a significant role in connectedness magnitude. A distinct liquidity cluster is observed for BTC, LTC, and XRP, and ETH, XMR, and Dash also form another distinct liquidity cluster. The frequency domain analysis reveals that liquidity connectedness is more pronounced in the short-run time horizon than the medium- and long-run time horizons. In the short run, BTC, LTC, and XRP are the leading contributor to liquidity shocks, whereas, in the long run, ETH assumes this role. Compared with the medium term, a tight liquidity clustering is found in the short and long terms. The time-varying analysis indicates that liquidity connectedness in the cryptocurrency market increases over time, pointing to the possible effect of rising demand and higher acceptability for this unique asset. Furthermore, more pronounced liquidity connectedness patterns are observed over the short and long run, reinforcing that liquidity connectedness in the cryptocurrency market is a phenomenon dependent on the time–frequency connectedness.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Property market liquidity and REIT liquidity
    Downs, David H.
    Zhu, Bing
    REAL ESTATE ECONOMICS, 2022, 50 (06) : 1462 - 1491
  • [42] Liquidity spillovers between cryptocurrency and foreign exchange markets
    Nekhili, Ramzi
    Sultan, Jahangir
    Bouri, Elie
    NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2023, 68
  • [43] Clean cryptocurrency and green assets: a quantile connectedness approach
    Shao, Shi-Feng
    Li, Yonglin
    Cheng, Jinhua
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2025, 32 (06) : 775 - 783
  • [44] Why cryptocurrency markets are inefficient: The impact of liquidity and volatility
    Al-Yahyaee, Khamis Hamed
    Mensi, Walid
    Ko, Hee-Un
    Yoon, Seong-Min
    Kang, Sang Hoon
    NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2020, 52
  • [45] Connectedness between cryptocurrency and technology sectors: International evidence
    Umar, Zaghum
    Trabelsi, Nader
    Alqahtani, Faisal
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2021, 71 : 910 - 922
  • [46] Do liquidity enhancement auctions improve the market liquidity in the JGB market?
    Hattori, Takahiro
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2019, 183
  • [47] Effects of COVID-19 on cryptocurrency and emerging market connectedness: Empirical evidence from quantile, frequency, and lasso networks
    Balcilar, Mehmet
    Ozdemir, Huseyin
    Agan, Busra
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2022, 604
  • [48] Announcement effects in the cryptocurrency market
    Hashemi Joo, Mohammad
    Nishikawa, Yuka
    Dandapani, Krishnan
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2020, 52 (44) : 4794 - 4808
  • [49] A Network Analysis of the Cryptocurrency Market
    Ho, Kin-Hon
    Chiu, Wai-Han
    Li, Chin
    2020 IEEE SYMPOSIUM SERIES ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (SSCI), 2020, : 2178 - 2185
  • [50] The dimension of popularity in the cryptocurrency market
    Panagiotis Anastasiadis
    Stephanos Papadamou
    SN Business & Economics, 2 (5):