Liquidity connectedness in cryptocurrency market

被引:0
|
作者
Mudassar Hasan
Muhammad Abubakr Naeem
Muhammad Arif
Syed Jawad Hussain Shahzad
Xuan Vinh Vo
机构
[1] The University of Lahore,Lahore Business School
[2] University College Dublin,Smurfit Graduate School of Business
[3] University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City,Institute of Business Research
[4] Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University,Department of Business Administration
[5] Montpellier Business School,Institute of Business Research and CFVG
[6] South Ural State University,undefined
[7] University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City,undefined
来源
关键词
Liquidity; Time–frequency connectedness; Cryptocurrencies; C10; C32; G01; G15;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We examine the dynamics of liquidity connectedness in the cryptocurrency market. We use the connectedness models of Diebold and Yilmaz (Int J Forecast 28(1):57–66, 2012) and Baruník and Křehlík (J Financ Econom 16(2):271–296, 2018) on a sample of six major cryptocurrencies, namely, Bitcoin (BTC), Litecoin (LTC), Ethereum (ETH), Ripple (XRP), Monero (XMR), and Dash. Our static analysis reveals a moderate liquidity connectedness among our sample cryptocurrencies, whereas BTC and LTC play a significant role in connectedness magnitude. A distinct liquidity cluster is observed for BTC, LTC, and XRP, and ETH, XMR, and Dash also form another distinct liquidity cluster. The frequency domain analysis reveals that liquidity connectedness is more pronounced in the short-run time horizon than the medium- and long-run time horizons. In the short run, BTC, LTC, and XRP are the leading contributor to liquidity shocks, whereas, in the long run, ETH assumes this role. Compared with the medium term, a tight liquidity clustering is found in the short and long terms. The time-varying analysis indicates that liquidity connectedness in the cryptocurrency market increases over time, pointing to the possible effect of rising demand and higher acceptability for this unique asset. Furthermore, more pronounced liquidity connectedness patterns are observed over the short and long run, reinforcing that liquidity connectedness in the cryptocurrency market is a phenomenon dependent on the time–frequency connectedness.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] COVID-19 and cryptocurrency market: Evidence from quantile connectedness
    Naeem, Muhammad Abubakr
    Qureshi, Saba
    Rehman, Mobeen Ur
    Balli, Faruk
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2022, 54 (03) : 280 - 306
  • [12] Investor attention and cryptocurrency market liquidity: a double-edged sword
    Shouyu Yao
    Ahmet Sensoy
    Duc Khuong Nguyen
    Tong Li
    Annals of Operations Research, 2024, 334 : 815 - 856
  • [13] Investor attention and cryptocurrency market liquidity: a double-edged sword
    Yao, Shouyu
    Sensoy, Ahmet
    Duc Khuong Nguyen
    Li, Tong
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2024, 334 (1-3) : 815 - 856
  • [14] The price and liquidity impact of China forbidding initial coin offerings on the cryptocurrency market
    Zhang, Sijia
    Gregoriou, Andros
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2020, 27 (20) : 1695 - 1698
  • [15] Cryptocurrency returns and the volatility of liquidity
    Leirvik, Thomas
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 44
  • [16] Periodicity in Cryptocurrency Volatility and Liquidity*
    Hansen, Peter Reinhard
    Kim, Chan
    Kimbrough, Wade
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMETRICS, 2024, 22 (01) : 224 - 251
  • [17] Determinants of liquidity in cryptocurrency markets
    J. Christopher Westland
    Digital Finance, 2023, 5 (2): : 261 - 293
  • [18] Dynamic connectedness and integration in cryptocurrency markets
    Ji, Qiang
    Bouri, Elie
    Lau, Chi Keung Marco
    Roubaud, David
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 63 : 257 - 272
  • [19] Liquidity connectedness and output synchronisation
    Inekwe, John Nkwoma
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS INSTITUTIONS & MONEY, 2020, 66
  • [20] Risk Connectedness Heterogeneity in the Cryptocurrency Markets
    Li, Zhenghui
    Wang, Yan
    Huang, Zhehao
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSICS, 2020, 8