Liquidity connectedness in cryptocurrency market

被引:0
|
作者
Mudassar Hasan
Muhammad Abubakr Naeem
Muhammad Arif
Syed Jawad Hussain Shahzad
Xuan Vinh Vo
机构
[1] The University of Lahore,Lahore Business School
[2] University College Dublin,Smurfit Graduate School of Business
[3] University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City,Institute of Business Research
[4] Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University,Department of Business Administration
[5] Montpellier Business School,Institute of Business Research and CFVG
[6] South Ural State University,undefined
[7] University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City,undefined
来源
关键词
Liquidity; Time–frequency connectedness; Cryptocurrencies; C10; C32; G01; G15;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We examine the dynamics of liquidity connectedness in the cryptocurrency market. We use the connectedness models of Diebold and Yilmaz (Int J Forecast 28(1):57–66, 2012) and Baruník and Křehlík (J Financ Econom 16(2):271–296, 2018) on a sample of six major cryptocurrencies, namely, Bitcoin (BTC), Litecoin (LTC), Ethereum (ETH), Ripple (XRP), Monero (XMR), and Dash. Our static analysis reveals a moderate liquidity connectedness among our sample cryptocurrencies, whereas BTC and LTC play a significant role in connectedness magnitude. A distinct liquidity cluster is observed for BTC, LTC, and XRP, and ETH, XMR, and Dash also form another distinct liquidity cluster. The frequency domain analysis reveals that liquidity connectedness is more pronounced in the short-run time horizon than the medium- and long-run time horizons. In the short run, BTC, LTC, and XRP are the leading contributor to liquidity shocks, whereas, in the long run, ETH assumes this role. Compared with the medium term, a tight liquidity clustering is found in the short and long terms. The time-varying analysis indicates that liquidity connectedness in the cryptocurrency market increases over time, pointing to the possible effect of rising demand and higher acceptability for this unique asset. Furthermore, more pronounced liquidity connectedness patterns are observed over the short and long run, reinforcing that liquidity connectedness in the cryptocurrency market is a phenomenon dependent on the time–frequency connectedness.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] How to measure the liquidity of cryptocurrency markets?
    Brauneis, Alexander
    Mestel, Roland
    Riordan, Ryan
    Theissen, Erik
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2021, 124
  • [22] Is liquidity risk priced in cryptocurrency markets?
    Han, SeungOh
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2023, 30 (17) : 2481 - 2487
  • [23] Liquidity risk and expected cryptocurrency returns
    Zhang, Wei
    Li, Yi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCE & ECONOMICS, 2023, 28 (01) : 472 - 492
  • [24] Return connectedness and volatility dynamics of the cryptocurrency network
    Poddar, Abhishek
    Misra, Arun Kumar
    Mishra, Ajay Kumar
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 58
  • [25] The cryptocurrency environmental attention and green bond connectedness
    Umar, Zaghum
    Bossman, Ahmed
    Iqbal, Najaf
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (53) : 114667 - 114677
  • [26] Quantile connectedness between cryptocurrency and commodity futures
    Joo, Young C.
    Park, Sung Y.
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 58
  • [27] Trading volume and liquidity provision in cryptocurrency markets *
    Bianchi, Daniele
    Babiak, Mykola
    Dickerson, Alexander
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2022, 142
  • [28] Market Liquidity and Funding Liquidity
    Brunnermeier, Markus K.
    Pedersen, Lasse Heje
    REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2009, 22 (06): : 2201 - 2238
  • [29] Frequency connectedness between DeFi and cryptocurrency markets
    Mensi, Walid
    Gubareva, Mariya
    Kang, Sang Hoon
    QUARTERLY REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2024, 93 : 12 - 27
  • [30] Returns and volume: Frequency connectedness in cryptocurrency markets*
    Fousekis, Panos
    Tzaferi, Dimitra
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2021, 95 : 13 - 20