A comparative simulation study on the power–performance of multi-core architecture

Nowadays, multi-core processor is the main technology used in desktop PCs, laptop computers and mobile hardware platforms. As the number of cores on a chip keeps increasing, it adds up the complexity and impacts more on both power and performance of a processor. In multi-processors, the number of cores and various parameters, such as issue-width, number of instructions and execution time, are key design factors to balance the amount of thread-level parallelism and instruction-level parallelism. In this paper, we perform a comprehensive simulation study that aims to find the optimum number of processor cores in desktop/laptop computing processor models with shallow pipeline depth. This paper also explores the trade-off between the number of cores and different parameters used in multi-processors in terms of power–performance gains and analyzes the impact of 3D stacking on the design of simultaneous multi-threading and chip multiprocessing. Our analysis shows that the optimum number of cores varies with different classes of workloads, namely: SPEC2000, SPEC2006 and MiBench. Simulation study is presented using architectures with shorter pipeline depth, showing that (1) the optimum number of cores for power–performance is 8, (2) the optimum number of threads in the range [2, 4], and (3) for beyond 32 cores, multi-core processors are no longer efficient in terms of performance benefits and overall power consumption.