Newborn hearing screening: Costs of establishing a program

被引:18
|
作者
Lemons J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Fanaroff A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Stewart E.J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Bentkover J.D. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Murray G. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Diefendorf A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Section of Neonatal - Perinatal Medicine, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, IN
[2] Section of Neonatal - Perinatal Medicine, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH
[3] Innovative Health Solutions, Brookline, MA
[4] Division of Audiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH
[5] Department of Audiology and Speech, Wishard Hospital, Indianapolis, IN
关键词
D O I
10.1038/sj.jp.7210618
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the costs and performance characteristics associated with the start-up phase of Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programs, one utilizing automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) and the other using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE). Study Design: Economic and performance data were collected at the initiation of both screening programs. Data were collected until 1500 newborn infants were screened or until a referral rate for further audiologic evaluation at hospital discharge of less than or equal to 5% was achieved. Data collected included screening pass/fail rates, referral rates and personnel, equipment, and supply utilization. Actual costs of personnel, equipment, and supplies were used. Statistical comparisons of proportions using z-statistic with the one-tailed test and an α of 0.01 were made. Results: Screening in the AABR program was performed by neonatal nurses, whereas screening in the TEOAE program was performed by master's level audiologists. The average age at initial screen was 29 hours for TEOAE, and 9.5 hours for AABR. Eighty-four percent of infants was screened within 24 hours in the AABR program, in contrast to 35% in the TEOAE program. Throughout the duration of the study, the referral rate at hospital discharge remained approximately 15% for the TEOAE program. The AABR referral rate began at 8% and was less than 4% at the completion of the study. Pre-discharge total costs for initiating and establishing the programs were US$49, 316 for TEOAE and US$47, 553 for AABR. Cost per infant screened was US$32.23 and US$33.68, respectively. When post-discharge screening and diagnostic evaluation costs were included, the total cost per infant screened was US$58.07 for TEOAE and US$45.85 for AABR. Conclusion: AABR appears to be the preferred method for universal newborn hearing screening. AABR was associated with the lowest costs, achieved the lowest referral rates at hospital discharge, and had the quickest learning curve to achieve those rates.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 124
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Status of Newborn Hearing Screening Program in the State of Tamil Nadu, India
    Madhan Chandrasekar
    Heramba Ganapathy Selvarajan
    Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, 2022, 74 : 639 - 650
  • [42] Status of Newborn Hearing Screening Program in the State of Tamil Nadu, India
    Chandrasekar, Madhan
    Selvarajan, Heramba Ganapathy
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2022, 74 (SUPPL 1) : 639 - 650
  • [43] The frequency of auditory neuropathy detected by universal newborn hearing screening program
    Kirkim, Gunay
    Serbetcioglu, Butent
    Erdag, Taner Kemal
    Ceryan, Kerim
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2008, 72 (10) : 1461 - 1469
  • [44] Comparison of costs and referral rates of 3 universal newborn hearing screening protocols
    Vohr, BR
    Oh, W
    Stewart, EJ
    Bentkover, JD
    Gabbard, S
    Lemons, J
    Papile, LA
    Pye, R
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2001, 139 (02): : 238 - 244
  • [45] Assessing and monitoring the impact of the national newborn hearing screening program in Israel
    Wasser, Janice
    Roth, Daphne Ari-Even
    Herzberg, Orly
    Lerner-Geva, Liat
    Rubin, Lisa
    ISRAEL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY RESEARCH, 2019, 8 (1)
  • [46] Minimizing false-positives in universal newborn hearing screening program
    Srinivasan, HB
    Srinivasan, G
    Lotke, M
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2004, 55 (04) : 593A - 593A
  • [47] Assessing and monitoring the impact of the national newborn hearing screening program in Israel
    Janice Wasser
    Daphne Ari-Even Roth
    Orly Herzberg
    Liat Lerner-Geva
    Lisa Rubin
    Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, 8
  • [48] NEWBORN HEARING SCREENING-PROGRAM - REPORT OF 2 YEARS EXPERIENCE
    STEWART, JM
    LUTZ, D
    DOWNS, M
    BERGSTROM, L
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1975, 23 (02): : A149 - A149
  • [49] Universal newborn hearing screening program in Saudi Arabia: Current insight
    Noura Alothman
    Reem Elbeltagy
    Reem Mulla
    Journal of Otology, 2024, 19 (01) : 35 - 39
  • [50] The prevalence of risk for hearing impairment in newborns with congenital syphilis in a newborn hearing screening program (NHS)
    Oliveira, Thalita da Silva
    Dutra, Monique Ramos Paschoal
    Nunes-Araujo, Aryelly Dayane da Silva
    Silva, Aline Roberta Xavier da
    Oliveira, Gabriel Barros Lins Lelis de
    Silva, Gleyson Jose Pinheiro Caldeira
    Valentim, Ricardo Alexsander de Medeiros
    Balen, Sheila Andreoli
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 11