Newborn hearing screening: Costs of establishing a program

被引:18
|
作者
Lemons J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Fanaroff A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Stewart E.J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Bentkover J.D. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Murray G. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Diefendorf A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Section of Neonatal - Perinatal Medicine, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, IN
[2] Section of Neonatal - Perinatal Medicine, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH
[3] Innovative Health Solutions, Brookline, MA
[4] Division of Audiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH
[5] Department of Audiology and Speech, Wishard Hospital, Indianapolis, IN
关键词
D O I
10.1038/sj.jp.7210618
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the costs and performance characteristics associated with the start-up phase of Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programs, one utilizing automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) and the other using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE). Study Design: Economic and performance data were collected at the initiation of both screening programs. Data were collected until 1500 newborn infants were screened or until a referral rate for further audiologic evaluation at hospital discharge of less than or equal to 5% was achieved. Data collected included screening pass/fail rates, referral rates and personnel, equipment, and supply utilization. Actual costs of personnel, equipment, and supplies were used. Statistical comparisons of proportions using z-statistic with the one-tailed test and an α of 0.01 were made. Results: Screening in the AABR program was performed by neonatal nurses, whereas screening in the TEOAE program was performed by master's level audiologists. The average age at initial screen was 29 hours for TEOAE, and 9.5 hours for AABR. Eighty-four percent of infants was screened within 24 hours in the AABR program, in contrast to 35% in the TEOAE program. Throughout the duration of the study, the referral rate at hospital discharge remained approximately 15% for the TEOAE program. The AABR referral rate began at 8% and was less than 4% at the completion of the study. Pre-discharge total costs for initiating and establishing the programs were US$49, 316 for TEOAE and US$47, 553 for AABR. Cost per infant screened was US$32.23 and US$33.68, respectively. When post-discharge screening and diagnostic evaluation costs were included, the total cost per infant screened was US$58.07 for TEOAE and US$45.85 for AABR. Conclusion: AABR appears to be the preferred method for universal newborn hearing screening. AABR was associated with the lowest costs, achieved the lowest referral rates at hospital discharge, and had the quickest learning curve to achieve those rates.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 124
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Universal newborn hearing screening in Mississippi: A statewide program.
    Graves, GR
    Buttross, SL
    Roark, S
    PEDIATRICS, 1998, 102 (03) : 765 - 765
  • [22] Overcoming difficulties in implementing a universal newborn hearing screening program
    Korres, S
    Balatsouras, DG
    Vlachou, S
    Kastanioudakis, IG
    Ziavra, NV
    Ferekidis, E
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2005, 47 (03) : 203 - 212
  • [23] Parents' Experiences in a Locally Initiated Newborn Hearing Screening Program
    Kelly, Sarah
    Bibby, Mary Ann
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY AND AUDIOLOGY, 2008, 32 (02): : 92 - 101
  • [24] An analysis of the costs of implementing the National Newborn Hearing Screening Programme in England
    Uus, K
    Bamford, J
    Taylor, R
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2006, 13 (01) : 14 - 19
  • [25] Integrating congenital cytomegalovirus screening within a newborn hearing screening program: Is it worthwhile?
    Beswick, Rachael
    McHugh, Lauren
    Clark, Julia E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2021, 142
  • [26] Newborn hearing screening program in China: a narrative review of the issues in screening and management
    Wen, Cheng
    Huang, Li-Hui
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2023, 11
  • [27] NEWBORN SCREENING FOR DMD IN HANGZHOU: ESTABLISHING THE REGISTRY AND FOLLOW UP PROGRAM
    Ke, Q.
    Gatheridge, M.
    Qi, M.
    Zhao, Z.
    Ciafaloni, E.
    Kwon, J.
    Connolly, A.
    Griggs, R. C.
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 2016, 54 : 15 - 16
  • [28] Newborn Hearing Screening
    George, Sherin Anne
    Alawadhi, Arwa
    Al Reefy, Hiba
    Riskalla, Andrew
    BAHRAIN MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2016, 38 (03) : 148 - 150
  • [29] Analysis of the costs of diagnosing cystic fibrosis with a newborn screening program
    Lee, DS
    Rosenberg, MA
    Peterson, A
    Makholm, L
    Hoffman, G
    Laessig, RH
    Farrell, PM
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2003, 142 (06): : 617 - 623
  • [30] NEWBORN HEARING SCREENING
    Monteiro Marone, Silvio Antonio
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2010, 76 (01) : 2 - 2