Newborn hearing screening: Costs of establishing a program

被引:18
|
作者
Lemons J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Fanaroff A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Stewart E.J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Bentkover J.D. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Murray G. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Diefendorf A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Section of Neonatal - Perinatal Medicine, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, IN
[2] Section of Neonatal - Perinatal Medicine, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH
[3] Innovative Health Solutions, Brookline, MA
[4] Division of Audiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH
[5] Department of Audiology and Speech, Wishard Hospital, Indianapolis, IN
关键词
D O I
10.1038/sj.jp.7210618
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the costs and performance characteristics associated with the start-up phase of Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programs, one utilizing automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) and the other using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE). Study Design: Economic and performance data were collected at the initiation of both screening programs. Data were collected until 1500 newborn infants were screened or until a referral rate for further audiologic evaluation at hospital discharge of less than or equal to 5% was achieved. Data collected included screening pass/fail rates, referral rates and personnel, equipment, and supply utilization. Actual costs of personnel, equipment, and supplies were used. Statistical comparisons of proportions using z-statistic with the one-tailed test and an α of 0.01 were made. Results: Screening in the AABR program was performed by neonatal nurses, whereas screening in the TEOAE program was performed by master's level audiologists. The average age at initial screen was 29 hours for TEOAE, and 9.5 hours for AABR. Eighty-four percent of infants was screened within 24 hours in the AABR program, in contrast to 35% in the TEOAE program. Throughout the duration of the study, the referral rate at hospital discharge remained approximately 15% for the TEOAE program. The AABR referral rate began at 8% and was less than 4% at the completion of the study. Pre-discharge total costs for initiating and establishing the programs were US$49, 316 for TEOAE and US$47, 553 for AABR. Cost per infant screened was US$32.23 and US$33.68, respectively. When post-discharge screening and diagnostic evaluation costs were included, the total cost per infant screened was US$58.07 for TEOAE and US$45.85 for AABR. Conclusion: AABR appears to be the preferred method for universal newborn hearing screening. AABR was associated with the lowest costs, achieved the lowest referral rates at hospital discharge, and had the quickest learning curve to achieve those rates.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 124
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Sensorineural and conductive hearing loss in infants diagnosed in the program of universal newborn hearing screening
    Wroblewska-Seniuk, Katarzyna
    Dabrowski, Piotr
    Greczka, Grazyna
    Szabatowska, Katarzyna
    Glowacka, Agata
    Szyfter, Witold
    Mazela, Jan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2018, 105 : 181 - 186
  • [32] Evaluation of a Screening Program: Challenges of Data Collection Using the Example of the Newborn Hearing Screening
    Sohl, Kristina
    Brockow, Inken
    Matulat, Peter
    Am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen, Antoinette
    Mansmann, Ulrich
    Nennstiel, Uta
    GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2022, 84 (02) : 117 - 125
  • [33] Quality measures of a multicentre universal newborn hearing screening program in Malaysia
    Wong, Yun Ai
    Mazlan, Rafidah
    Wahab, Noor Alaudin Abdul
    Ja'afar, Roslan
    Bani, Nurul Huda
    Abdullah, Nurul Ain
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2021, 28 (03) : 238 - 243
  • [34] Perspectives on a state enacted hearing screening and assessment program in the newborn population
    Abrams, MJ
    Pensak, ML
    Buhrer, K
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLOGY, 1997, 18 (03): : 368 - 372
  • [35] Parent’s Satisfaction of Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Program in Iran
    Arash Bayat
    Farzaneh Zamiri Abdollahi
    Nader Saki
    Farzad Faraji Khiavi
    Saeed Mohammadian
    Mohammadsaleh Moosapour Bardsiri
    Reza Hoseinabadi
    Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, 2022, 74 : 517 - 522
  • [36] Universal newborn hearing screening program in Saudi Arabia: Current insight
    Alothman, Noura
    Elbeltagy, Reem
    Mulla, Reem
    JOURNAL OF OTOLOGY, 2024, 19 (01) : 35 - 39
  • [37] Identifying Quality Improvement Opportunities in a Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Program
    Deem, Kenneth C.
    Diaz-Ordaz, Ernesto A.
    Shiner, Brian
    PEDIATRICS, 2012, 129 (01) : E157 - E164
  • [38] Parent's Satisfaction of Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Program in Iran
    Bayat, Arash
    Abdollahi, Farzaneh Zamiri
    Saki, Nader
    Khiavi, Farzad Faraji
    Mohammadian, Saeed
    Bardsiri, Mohammadsaleh Moosapour
    Hoseinabadi, Reza
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2022, 74 (SUPPL 1) : 517 - 522
  • [39] Predictors of Parental Recall of Newborn Hearing Screening Program in Saudi Arabia
    Almatrafi, Mohammed A. A.
    Alsahaf, Nouf
    Kabli, Abdulrahman
    Maksood, Lama
    Alharbi, Khawlah
    Alsharif, Alhanouf
    Mujahed, Revan A. A.
    Naser, Abdallah Y. Y.
    Assaggaf, Hamza M. M.
    Mosalli, Rafat
    Alshareef, Shahd
    Salawati, Emad
    HEALTHCARE, 2023, 11 (09)
  • [40] Reducing false positives in newborn hearing screening program: How and why
    Lin, Hung-Ching
    Shu, Min-Tsan
    Lee, Kuo-Sheng
    Lin, Huang-Yu
    Lin, Grace
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2007, 28 (06) : 788 - 792