Evidence map of studies evaluating methods for conducting, interpreting and reporting overviews of systematic reviews of interventions: Rationale and design

被引:28
|
作者
Lunny C. [1 ]
Brennan S.E. [1 ]
McDonald S. [1 ]
McKenzie J.E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash University, Australasian Cochrane Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, 549 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, 3004, VIC
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Evidence map; Evidenced-based methods; Overviews of systematic reviews;
D O I
10.1186/s13643-015-0178-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Overviews of systematic reviews attempt to systematically retrieve and summarise the results of multiple systematic reviews into a single document. Methods for conducting, interpreting and reporting overviews of reviews are in their infancy. To date, there has been no systematic review or evidence map examining the range of methods for overviews nor of the evidence for using these methods. The objectives of the study are to develop and populate a framework of methods that have or may be used in conducting, interpreting and reporting overviews of systematic reviews of interventions (stage I); create an evidence map of studies that have evaluated these methods (stage II); and identify and describe unique methodological challenges of overviews. Methods: The research will be undertaken in two stages. For both stages, we plan to search methods collections (e.g. Cochrane Methodology Register, Meth4ReSyn library, AHRQ Effective Health Care Program) to identify eligible studies. These searches will be supplemented by searching reference lists and citation searching. Stage I: Methods used in overviews will be identified from articles describing methods for overviews, methods studies examining a cross section/cohort of overviews, guidance documents and commentaries. The identified methods will populate a framework of available methods for conducting an overview. Two reviewers will independently code included studies to develop the framework. Thematic analysis of the coded data will be used to categorise and describe methods. Stage II: Evaluations of the performance of methods will be identified from systematic reviews of methods studies and methods studies. Evaluations will be described and mapped to the framework of methods identified in stage I. Discussion: The results of this process will be useful for mapping of methods for overviews of systematic reviews, informing guidance and identifying and prioritising method research in this field. © 2016 Lunny et al.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An Evidence Map of Systematic Reviews to Inform Interventions in Prediabetes
    Singh, Kavita
    Ansari, Mohammed
    Galipeau, James
    Garritty, Chantelle
    Keely, Erin
    Malcolm, Janine
    Pratt, Mistrel
    Skidmore, Becky
    Sorisky, Alexander
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2012, 36 (05) : 281 - 291
  • [2] Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions published 2012–2016: protocol for a systematic review
    Dawid Pieper
    Michelle Pollock
    Ricardo M. Fernandes
    Roland Brian Büchter
    Lisa Hartling
    Systematic Reviews, 6
  • [3] Reporting guidelines on how to write a complete and transparent abstract for overviews of systematic reviews of health care interventions
    Bougioukas, Konstantinos I.
    Bouras, Emmanouil
    Apostolidou-Kiouti, Fani
    Kokkali, Stamatia
    Arvanitidou, Malamatenia
    Haidich, Anna-Bettina
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 106 : 70 - 79
  • [4] Methodological studies evaluating evidence are not systematic reviews
    Puljak, Livia
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 110 : 98 - 99
  • [5] Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions published 2012-2016: protocol for a systematic review
    Pieper, Dawid
    Pollock, Michelle
    Fernandes, Ricardo M.
    Buechter, Roland Brian
    Hartling, Lisa
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, 6
  • [6] Methods for conducting systematic reviews of the evidence of effectiveness and economic efficiency of interventions to promote healthy social environments
    Anderson, LM
    Fielding, JE
    Fullilove, MT
    Scrimshaw, SC
    Carande-Kulis, VG
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2003, 24 (03) : 25 - 31
  • [7] Systematic reviews of observational studies: evaluating evidence quality
    Myers, Evan R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 215 (01) : 1 - 3
  • [8] The role of systematic reviews of qualitative evidence in evaluating interventions: a case study
    Lorenc, Theo
    Pearson, Mark
    Jamal, Farah
    Cooper, Chris
    Garside, Ruth
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2012, 3 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [9] Methods for conducting systematic reviews of the evidence of effectiveness and economic efficiency of interventions to reduce injuries to motor vehicle occupants
    Zaza, S
    Carande-Kulis, VG
    Sleet, DA
    Sosin, DM
    Elder, RW
    Shults, RA
    Dinh-Zarr, TB
    Nichols, JL
    Thompson, RS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2001, 21 (04) : 23 - 30
  • [10] Methods and guidance on conducting, reporting, publishing, and appraising living systematic reviews: a scoping review
    Claire Iannizzi
    Elie A. Akl
    Eva Anslinger
    Stephanie Weibel
    Lara A. Kahale
    Abina Mosunmola Aminat
    Vanessa Piechotta
    Nicole Skoetz
    Systematic Reviews, 12